Programa de Pós-Graduação em Saúde Baseada em Evidências, Universidade Federal de São Paulo, São Paulo, São Paulo, Brazil.
SUS Collaborating Centre for Technology Assessment & Excellence in Health, Faculdade de Farmácia, Universidade Federal de Minas Gerais, Belo Horizonte, Minas Gerais, Brazil.
PLoS One. 2020 Sep 2;15(9):e0238476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0238476. eCollection 2020.
Relapsing-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMM) is a chronic, progressive, inflammatory and immune-mediated disease that affects the central nervous system and is characterized by episodes of neurological dysfunction followed by a period of remission. The pharmacological strategy aims to delay the progression of the disease and prevent relapse. Interferon beta and glatiramer are commonly used in the Brazilian public health system and are available to patients who meet the guideline criteria. The scenario of multiple treatments available and in development brings the need for discussion and evaluation of the technologies already available before the incorporation of new drugs. This study analyses the effectiveness of first-line treatment of RRMS measured by real-world evidence data, from the Brazilian National Health System (SUS).
We conducted a non-concurrent national cohort between 2000 and 2015. The study population consisted of 22,722 patients with RRMS using one of the following first-line drugs of interest: glatiramer or one of three presentations of interferon beta. Kaplan-Meier analysis was used to estimate the time to treatment failure. A univariate and multivariate Cox proportional hazard model was used to evaluate factors associated with treatment failure. In addition, patients were propensity score-matched (1:1) in six groups of comparative first-line treatments to evaluate the effectiveness among them. The analysis indicated a higher risk of treatment failure in female patients (HR = 1.08; P = 0,01), those with comorbidities at baseline (HR = 1.20; P<0,0001), in patients who developed comorbidities after starting treatment (i.e., rheumatoid arthritis-HR = 1.65; P<0,0001), those exclusive SUS patients (HR = 1.31; P<0,0001) and among patients using intramuscular interferon beta (IM βINF-1a) (28% to 60% compared to the other three treatments; P<0,0001). Lower risk of treatment failure was found among patients treated with glatiramer.
This retrospective cohort suggests that glatiramer is associated with greater effectiveness compared to the three presentations of interferon beta. When evaluating beta interferons, the results suggest that the intramuscular presentation is not effective in the treatment of multiple sclerosis.
复发缓解型多发性硬化症(RRMS)是一种慢性、进行性、炎症性和免疫介导的疾病,影响中枢神经系统,其特征是神经功能障碍发作后伴有缓解期。药物治疗策略旨在延缓疾病进展并预防复发。在巴西公共卫生系统中,干扰素β和聚甘酯常被使用,且符合指南标准的患者均可获得。由于有多种治疗方法可供选择和开发,因此需要对已经存在的技术进行讨论和评估,然后再加入新的药物。本研究通过巴西国家卫生系统(SUS)的真实世界证据数据,分析 RRMS 一线治疗的有效性。
我们在 2000 年至 2015 年期间进行了一项非同期全国队列研究。研究人群由 22722 名 RRMS 患者组成,他们使用了以下一线药物中的一种:聚甘酯或三种干扰素β制剂之一。Kaplan-Meier 分析用于估计治疗失败的时间。采用单变量和多变量 Cox 比例风险模型评估与治疗失败相关的因素。此外,我们对六种一线治疗药物进行了 1:1 倾向评分匹配(PSM),以评估它们之间的有效性。分析表明,女性患者(HR=1.08;P=0.01)、基线合并症患者(HR=1.20;P<0.0001)、治疗后合并症患者(即类风湿关节炎-HR=1.65;P<0.0001)、仅使用 SUS 的患者(HR=1.31;P<0.0001)以及使用肌肉内干扰素β(IMβINF-1a)的患者(与其他三种治疗方法相比,风险比为 28%至 60%;P<0.0001)发生治疗失败的风险更高。使用聚甘酯治疗的患者发生治疗失败的风险较低。
本回顾性队列研究表明,与三种干扰素β制剂相比,聚甘酯与更高的疗效相关。在评估β干扰素时,结果表明肌肉内制剂在多发性硬化症的治疗中无效。