Department of Geological Sciences and Environmental Studies, State University of New York at Binghamton, P.O. Box 6000 Binghamton, New York 13902-6000 USA.
Disasters. 1992 Dec;16(4):283-98. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-7717.1992.tb00411.x.
Research on the effects of natural events on property values has focused primarily on experiences in the United States and has shown that these impacts must be evaluated in the context of both the hydrologic regime and local urban economic situations. It remains unclear if these relationships exist with different flood regimes and under different institutional arrangements. The research reported here analyzes the impacts of flooding on property values in Paeroa, Te Aroha, and Thames, New Zealand. The results indicate different experiences in the three communities, but suggest several common trends. Each community has distinct housing submarkets that exhibit different housing value characteristics, independent of hazardousness, which may either mask or exaggerate flood-related impacts. In addition, initial local impacts of events vary, but eventually differences in flooded and non-flooded properties decrease. Thus, at least over the long term, hazardousness is not a factor in housing value differentials.
关于自然事件对财产价值影响的研究主要集中在美国的经验上,研究表明,这些影响必须在水文状况和当地城市经济状况的背景下进行评估。目前尚不清楚这些关系是否存在于不同的洪水状况和不同的制度安排下。本报告所分析的研究报告分析了洪水对新西兰佩罗阿、泰阿罗哈和泰晤士河地区财产价值的影响。结果表明,这三个社区的经历各不相同,但也有几个共同的趋势。每个社区都有不同的住房细分市场,这些细分市场表现出不同的住房价值特征,与危害性无关,这可能掩盖或夸大与洪水有关的影响。此外,事件的初始当地影响各不相同,但最终洪水泛滥和未泛滥的房产之间的差异会减少。因此,至少从长期来看,危害性并不是住房价值差异的一个因素。