Suppr超能文献

心抑制性反射性心脏骤停导致的死亡——病例系统评价。

Death caused by cardioinhibitory reflex cardiac arrest--a systematic review of cases.

机构信息

University Centre of Legal Medicine, Lausanne-Geneva, Rue Michel-Servet 1, 1211 Genève 4, Switzerland.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2011 Apr 15;207(1-3):77-83. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.09.010. Epub 2010 Oct 20.

Abstract

Forensic pathologists often refer to the cardioinhibitory reflex cardiac arrest (CiRCA) following short neck trauma as a mechanism of death. We sought via a systematic review of the literature to identify circumstances under which carotid bifurcation stimulation could lead to death. Two independent reviewers selected case studies or reports from Medline, ISI Web of Knowledge, and Embase. Circumstances and contributory factors were extracted for each case. From the available data, authors independently assessed whether CiRCA was highly probable (no alternative explanation possible), probable (alternative explanation possible), or unlikely (alternative explanation highly probable). A narrative approach was used to define circumstances in which CiRCA remained possible. From the 48 published cases evoking CiRCA as a possible cause of death between 1881 and 2009, 28 were most likely to result of other mechanism of death (i.e., cerebral hypoxia due to carotid compression, mechanical asphyxia, myocardial infarction). CiRCA remained possible for 20 cases (including five based on anecdotal evidence only) with only one case with no alternative explanation other than CiRCA. Our findings support the presumption that reflex cardiac arrhythmia due to carotid bifurcation stimulation cannot provoke death alone. Actual state of knowledge suggests CiRCA might be contributory to death in the presence of drug abuse and/or cardiac pathology, often associated with physical and/or mental excitation.

摘要

法医病理学家常将短颈创伤后抑制性心血管反射性心搏停止(CiRCA)作为一种死亡机制。我们通过对文献的系统回顾,旨在确定颈动脉分叉刺激导致死亡的情况。两位独立的审查员从 Medline、ISI Web of Knowledge 和 Embase 中选择了病例研究或报告。为每个病例提取了情况和促成因素。根据现有数据,作者独立评估 CiRCA 是否极有可能(无其他可能的解释)、可能(可能有其他解释)或不太可能(极有可能有其他解释)。采用叙述性方法来定义 CiRCA 仍然可能的情况。在 1881 年至 2009 年间发表的 48 篇引起 CiRCA 作为可能死因的病例中,28 例最有可能由其他死亡机制引起(即颈动脉压迫导致的脑缺氧、机械性窒息、心肌梗死)。在 20 例(包括仅基于传闻证据的 5 例)中,CiRCA 仍然是可能的,只有 1 例除了 CiRCA 之外没有其他解释。我们的研究结果支持这样的假设,即颈动脉分叉刺激引起的反射性心律失常不能单独引起死亡。现有知识表明,在滥用药物和/或存在心脏病理的情况下,CiRCA 可能会导致死亡,这通常与身体和/或精神兴奋有关。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验