Department of Internal Medicine, University of Missouri-Columbia, Columbia, Missouri 65212, USA.
J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2010 Nov-Dec;17(6):702-6. doi: 10.1136/jamia.2010.004556.
Physician-patient email communication is gaining popularity. However, a formal assessment of physicians' email communication skills has not been described. We hypothesized that the email communication skills of rheumatology fellows can be measured in an objective structured clinical examination (OSCE) setting using a novel email content analysis instrument which has 18 items. During an OSCE, we asked 50 rheumatology fellows to respond to a simulated patient email. The content of the responses was assessed using our instrument. The majority of rheumatology fellows wrote appropriate responses scoring a mean (±SD) of 10.6 (±2.6) points (maximum score 18), with high inter-rater reliability (0.86). Most fellows were concise (74%) and courteous (68%) but not formal (22%). Ninety-two percent of fellows acknowledged that the patient's condition required urgent medical attention, but only 30% took active measures to contact the patient. No one encrypted their messages. The objective assessment of email communication skills is possible using simulated emails in an OSCE setting. The variable email communication scores and incidental patient safety gaps identified, suggest a need for further training and defined proficiency standards for physicians' email communication skills.
医患间的电子邮件交流正日益普及。然而,目前尚未对医生的电子邮件交流技巧进行正式评估。我们假设可以使用一种新颖的电子邮件内容分析工具,通过客观结构化临床考试(OSCE)来衡量风湿病住院医师的电子邮件交流技巧,该工具包含 18 个项目。在 OSCE 中,我们要求 50 名风湿病住院医师回复一封模拟患者的电子邮件。使用我们的工具评估回复的内容。大多数风湿病住院医师的回复恰当,平均(±SD)得分为 10.6(±2.6)分(满分 18 分),评分者间具有较高的可靠性(0.86)。大多数住院医师的回复简明扼要(74%)且礼貌(68%),但不够正式(22%)。92%的住院医师承认患者的病情需要紧急医疗关注,但只有 30%的住院医师采取了积极措施联系患者。没有人对邮件进行加密。使用 OSCE 中的模拟电子邮件可以对电子邮件交流技巧进行客观评估。电子邮件交流评分的多变性以及偶然出现的患者安全漏洞表明,需要对医生的电子邮件交流技巧进行进一步培训,并制定明确的熟练程度标准。