UMR-204 NUTRIPASS, Institut de Recherche pour le Développement, Montpellier, France.
J Nutr. 2010 Dec;140(12):2233-40. doi: 10.3945/jn.110.125716. Epub 2010 Oct 20.
The number of urban poor is increasing quickly in West Africa, yet food security early warning systems still do not include urban areas. One reason is the lack of appropriate and internationally agreed-upon indicators to measure urban household food insecurity. Our objective was to assess the performance of the household food insecurity access scale (HFIAS) and an index-member's dietary diversity score (IDDS) to approximate the adequacy of urban households' diets. A survey was performed on a random cluster sample of 1056 households in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso. Data on HFIAS and IDDS and 2 nonconsecutive household quantitative 24-h recalls were collected twice, in June-July and in November-December 2007. Diet adequacy was assessed through the household's mean adequacy ratio (MAR) using energy and 11 micronutrients. Structural equation modeling was used to quantify the association of each candidate indicator with the MAR and receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) analyses were performed to assess their targeting performance in predicting low or high MAR. HFIAS was negatively associated with the MAR [path coefficient (P) = -7.95 × 10(-3) ± 1.45 × 10(-3); P < 0.001], whereas IDDS was positively associated with it (P = 5.19 × 10(-2) ± 1.27 × 10(-2); P < 0.001). Areas under the ROC curves ranged from 0.585 to 0.661 for HFIAS and from 0.536 to 0.629 for IDDS. In conclusion, HFIAS and IDDS performed well in approximating adequacy of urban households' diets. They are informative indicators about urban food insecurity, promising for evaluation and monitoring but not for household targeting given their insufficient predictive power.
西非的城市贫困人口数量正在迅速增加,但粮食安全预警系统仍未将城市地区纳入其中。一个原因是缺乏适当的、国际公认的指标来衡量城市家庭的粮食不安全状况。我们的目的是评估家庭粮食不安全获取尺度(HFIAS)和一个指数成员的饮食多样性评分(IDDS)在近似城市家庭饮食充足度方面的表现。在布基纳法索瓦加杜古,我们对一个随机聚类样本的 1056 户家庭进行了调查。收集了 HFIAS 和 IDDS 数据以及 2 份非连续家庭定量 24 小时回忆数据,时间分别为 2007 年 6-7 月和 11-12 月。通过家庭平均充足率(MAR)使用能量和 11 种微量营养素来评估饮食充足度。结构方程模型用于量化每个候选指标与 MAR 的关联,接收者操作特征(ROC)分析用于评估它们在预测低或高 MAR 方面的目标表现。HFIAS 与 MAR 呈负相关(路径系数(P)=-7.95×10(-3)±1.45×10(-3);P<0.001),而 IDDS 与之呈正相关(P=5.19×10(-2)±1.27×10(-2);P<0.001)。HFIAS 的 ROC 曲线下面积范围为 0.585 至 0.661,IDDS 的 ROC 曲线下面积范围为 0.536 至 0.629。总之,HFIAS 和 IDDS 在近似城市家庭饮食充足度方面表现良好。它们是关于城市粮食不安全的信息指标,具有评估和监测的潜力,但由于预测能力不足,不适合用于家庭目标定位。