Cardona Alvaro, Nieto Emmanuel, Mejía Luz M
Facultad Nacional de Salud Pública, Universidad de Antioquia, Medellín, Colombia.
Rev Salud Publica (Bogota). 2010;12 Suppl 1:123-37. doi: 10.1590/s0124-00642010000700009.
Performing an academic exercise aimed at applying the analytical categories from the governance approach developed by Marc Hufty et al., to understand social actors relationships in an investigation and intervention project studying so-cioeconomic conditions and seeking to guarantee health insurance continuity for those workers who had lost their work in the city of Medellin, Colombia, from 2004 to 2007.
A process of investigation and intervention was examined as a casestudy in which researchers were one of the actors so involved. Characterising stake-holders included: their level of inclusion/involvement in the problem; their power for influencing public policy proposals; their perceptions and proposals characteristics, power and dynamics regarding the problem of unemployment and health insurance when someone has lost her/his work; and the characteristics of their interaction with other actors.
The results showed that the four analytical dimensions proposed by Hufty (actors, social norms, nodal points and processes) were useful for describing and understanding the interaction of the actors involved in the research and intervention proposal being analysed here (i.e. the case-study).
It was concluded that the analytical governance framework proposed by Hufty was useful for understanding how the social subjects interacted; these were the rules which were taken for describing their interaction, being the most important nodes for interaction and progresses achieved whilst implementing the intervention proposal.
开展一项学术活动，旨在运用马克·胡夫蒂等人提出的治理方法中的分析类别，以了解在一项研究社会经济状况并试图为2004年至2007年期间在哥伦比亚麦德林市失去工作的工人保障医疗保险连续性的调查与干预项目中社会行为者之间的关系。
将一个调查与干预过程作为案例研究进行审视，其中研究人员是参与其中的行为者之一。对利益相关者的特征描述包括：他们对问题的参与程度；他们影响公共政策提案的能力；他们对某人失业时失业保险问题的看法、提案的特征、能力和动态；以及他们与其他行为者互动的特征。
结果表明，胡夫蒂提出的四个分析维度（行为者、社会规范、节点和过程）有助于描述和理解参与此处所分析的研究与干预提案（即案例研究）的行为者之间的互动。
得出的结论是，胡夫蒂提出的分析治理框架有助于理解社会主体如何互动；这些是用于描述他们互动的规则，是互动的最重要节点以及在实施干预提案过程中取得的进展。
