Health Governance Hub Public Health Foundation of India, Plot No. 47, Sector 44, Institutional Area, Gurgaon, Haryana, 122002, India.
Department of Global Health and Development, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, Keppel Street, London, WC1E 7H, UK.
Int J Equity Health. 2018 Jun 7;17(1):73. doi: 10.1186/s12939-018-0785-1.
Public Private Partnerships (PPP) are increasingly utilized as a public health strategy for strengthening health systems and have become a core component for the delivery of TB control services in India, as promoted through national policy. However, partnerships are complex systems that rely on relationships between a myriad of different actors with divergent agendas and backgrounds. Relationship is a crucial element of governance, and relationship building an important aspect of partnerships. To understand PPPs a multi-disciplinary perspective that draws on insights from social theory is needed. This paper demonstrates how social theory can aid the understanding of the complex relationships of actors involved in implementation of Public-Private Mix (PPM)-TB policy in India.
Ethnographic research was conducted within a district in a Southern state of India over a 14 month period, combining participant observations, informal interactions and in-depth interviews with a wide range of respondents across public, private and non-government organisation (NGO) sectors.
Drawing on the theoretical insights from Bourdieu's "theory of practice" this study explores the relationships between the different actors. The study found that programme managers, frontline TB workers, NGOs, and private practitioners all had a crucial role to play in TB partnerships. They were widely regarded as valued contributors with distinct social skills and capabilities within their organizations and professions. However, their potential contributions towards programme implementation tended to be unrecognized both at the top and bottom of the policy implementation chain. These actors constantly struggled for recognition and used different mechanisms to position themselves alongside other actors within the programme that further complicated the relationships between different actors.
This paper demonstrates that applying social theory can enable a better understanding of the complex relationship across public, private and NGO sectors. A closer understanding of these processes is a prerequisite for bridging the gap between field-level practices and central policy intentions, facilitating a move towards more effective partnership strategies for strengthening local health systems. The study contributes to our understanding of implementation of PPP for TB control and builds knowledge to help policy makers and programme managers strengthen and effectively implement strategies to enable stronger governance of these partnerships.
公私合作伙伴关系(PPP)作为加强卫生系统的公共卫生策略越来越多地被利用,并已成为印度提供结核病控制服务的核心组成部分,这是通过国家政策推动的。然而,伙伴关系是复杂的系统,依赖于具有不同议程和背景的无数不同行为者之间的关系。关系是治理的关键要素,建立关系是伙伴关系的重要方面。为了理解公私伙伴关系,需要从社会理论中汲取跨学科的视角。本文展示了社会理论如何帮助理解参与印度实施公私混合(PPM)-TB 政策的行为者之间复杂的关系。
在印度南部一个邦的一个区进行了为期 14 个月的民族志研究,结合了对公共、私营和非政府组织(NGO)部门的广泛受访者的参与观察、非正式互动和深入访谈。
本文借鉴了布迪厄“实践理论”的理论观点,探讨了不同行为者之间的关系。研究发现,方案管理者、一线结核病工作者、非政府组织和私营从业者在结核病伙伴关系中都发挥了至关重要的作用。他们被广泛认为是有价值的贡献者,在其组织和专业领域具有独特的社会技能和能力。然而,他们对方案实施的潜在贡献在政策执行链的顶端和底端都未得到认可。这些行为者不断争取认可,并利用不同的机制将自己定位在方案中的其他行为者旁边,这进一步使不同行为者之间的关系复杂化。
本文表明,应用社会理论可以更好地理解公共、私营和 NGO 部门之间复杂的关系。更深入地了解这些过程是弥合实地实践与中央政策意图之间差距的前提,有助于制定更有效的伙伴关系战略,以加强地方卫生系统。本研究有助于我们理解结核病控制公私伙伴关系的实施,并为政策制定者和方案管理者提供知识,以帮助他们加强和有效地实施战略,以加强对这些伙伴关系的治理。