Suppr超能文献

超声引导下经皮第一环状滑车松解术:针和刀技术的尸体安全性研究。

Sonographically guided percutaneous first annular pulley release: cadaveric safety study of needle and knife techniques.

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Mayo Clinic College of Medicine, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.

出版信息

J Ultrasound Med. 2010 Nov;29(11):1531-42. doi: 10.7863/jum.2010.29.11.1531.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to assess the safety of sonographically guided percutaneous finger and thumb first annular (A1) pulley releases performed using needle and hook knife techniques in an unembalmed cadaveric model.

METHODS

A single operator completed 50 (40 fingers and 10 thumbs) sonographically guided percutaneous A1 pulley releases in unembalmed cadavers using previously described needle and hook knife techniques and simulated local anesthesia. Half of the fingers and thumbs were completed with each technique. An experienced observer blinded to the technique dissected each specimen and assessed for neurovascular, flexor tendon, and A2 pulley injury. Completeness of release was also recorded as a secondary outcome.

RESULTS

No neurovascular or A2 pulley injury occurred in any digit, regardless of technique. No significant flexor tendon injury was seen in any digit, although minor surface scratches were visualized in 3 cases (6%; 2 knife and 1 needle). The hook knife technique was significantly more likely to result in a complete pulley release compared to the needle technique (22 of 25 [88%] versus 8 of 25 [32%]; P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Sonographically guided percutaneous A1 pulley releases can be performed safely using previously described needle and hook knife techniques. The safety margin for thumb releases is less than that for finger releases, particularly with respect to the radial digital nerve. These cadaveric data support recently published clinical investigations recommending consideration of sonographically guided percutaneous A1 pulley release in the management of patients with a disabling trigger finger.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估在未经防腐处理的尸体模型中,使用针和钩刀技术行超声引导下经皮手指和拇指第一环形(A1)滑车切开术的安全性。

方法

一位操作者使用先前描述的针和钩刀技术,模拟局部麻醉,在未经防腐处理的尸体上完成了 50 例(40 个手指和 10 个拇指)超声引导下经皮 A1 滑车切开术。每个技术完成一半的手指和拇指。一位经验丰富的观察者在不了解技术的情况下解剖每个标本,评估神经血管、屈肌腱和 A2 滑车损伤情况。将释放的完整性也作为次要结果进行记录。

结果

无论采用哪种技术,任何手指都没有发生神经血管或 A2 滑车损伤。任何手指都没有明显的屈肌腱损伤,但在 3 例(6%;2 例钩刀,1 例针)中观察到轻微的表面划痕。与针技术相比,钩刀技术更有可能实现完全的滑车释放(22 例[88%]对 8 例[32%];P<0.001)。

结论

使用先前描述的针和钩刀技术,可以安全地进行超声引导下经皮 A1 滑车切开术。拇指切开术的安全范围小于手指切开术,尤其是在桡侧指神经方面。这些尸体数据支持最近发表的临床研究,该研究建议在管理患有致残性扳机指的患者时考虑超声引导下经皮 A1 滑车切开术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验