Suppr超能文献

在不同嵴顶水平位置使用改良基台连接评估种植体周围边缘骨丢失情况。

Evaluation of peri-implant marginal bone loss using modified abutment connections at various crestal level placements.

作者信息

Veis Alexander, Parissis Nikolaos, Tsirlis Anastasios, Papadeli Chrysa, Marinis Georgios, Zogakis Antonios

机构信息

Department of Dentoalveolar Surgery, Surgical Implantology and Radiology, Dental School, Aristotle University, Thessaloniki, Greece.

出版信息

Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent. 2010 Dec;30(6):609-17.

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate crestal bone loss around 282 two-piece implants with straight (n = 193) and platform-switched (n = 89) abutment connections after placement at various crestal levels. Implants were assigned into two groups according to straight and platform-switched abutment connections. Each group was further subdivided into three groups depending on the location (supracrestal, crestal, or subcrestal) of the implant cervical platform. Linear measurements of bone resorption were made from the implant's platform to the first point of bone-to-implant contact at the time of implant placement and 2 years postrestoration. Data were statistically analyzed. Statistically significant differences were found between subgroups in both straight and platform-switched categories. The only nonstatistically significant difference (P = .341) arose when comparing the supra- and subcrestal locations in the straight abutment connection group. The platform-switched group exhibited significantly less bone loss (P = .046) only in subcrestal locations. The platform-switched concept was not beneficial during the overall comparison, but it was for the subcrestal location of the abutment connection. Crestal placement of the implant-abutment connection resulted in higher marginal bone resorption in both straight and platform-switched abutments.

摘要

本研究的目的是评估282颗两件式种植体在不同嵴顶水平植入后,采用直型(n = 193)和平台转换型(n = 89)基台连接时的嵴顶骨吸收情况。根据直型和平台转换型基台连接将种植体分为两组。每组再根据种植体颈部平台的位置(嵴上、嵴顶或嵴下)进一步细分为三组。在种植体植入时和修复后2年,从种植体平台至骨与种植体首次接触点进行骨吸收的线性测量。对数据进行统计学分析。在直型和平台转换型类别中,各亚组之间均发现有统计学显著差异。在直型基台连接组中,比较嵴上和嵴下位置时,仅出现无统计学显著差异(P = 0.341)。平台转换组仅在嵴下位置表现出显著较少的骨吸收(P = 0.046)。在总体比较中,平台转换概念并无益处,但对于基台连接的嵴下位置有益。种植体 - 基台连接的嵴顶放置在直型和平台转换型基台中均导致更高的边缘骨吸收。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验