Suppr超能文献

原发骶尾部藏毛窦行一期缝合或菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣转移术治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。

Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Wrexham Maelor Hospital, Wrexham, UK.

出版信息

Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02473.x.

Abstract

AIM

Sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease is a common condition afflicting the young male working and student population, resulting in considerable pain, embarrassment and loss of work days. Controversy surrounds the most appropriate surgical approach to achieve low recurrence rates whilst minimizing morbidity and permitting an early return to work. This study aims to review the published literature comparing excision followed by either primary suture or rhomboid flap repair.

METHODS

PubMed, EMBASE, MEDLINE and The Cochrane Library were systematically reviewed, by two independent investigators, for relevant randomized controlled trials. Keywords and MeSH terms included 'pilonidal disease', 'primary suture/repair', 'rhomboid flap' and 'limberg/modified Limberg flap'. 'Related study' function and manuscript bibliographies were searched for further relevant studies. Study quality was assessed using the Jadad score. Meta-analysis was performed on pooled data, utilizing a random effects model when heterogeneity was high and a fixed effects model when heterogeneity was low. The primary end-point assessed was disease recurrence. Secondary end-points included wound dehiscence, pain scores, hospital stay and return to work.

RESULTS

Six studies were eventually included for pooled analysis following exclusion of randomized controlled trials with poor methodology. Two studies compared 'off-midline' (Karydakis) primary suture with the Limberg flap repair. Six hundred and forty-one patients were included (331 flap repairs). Rhomboid flap excision demonstrated a trend towards less disease recurrence (P = 0.07), lower wound infection (P = 0.001) and dehiscence (P = 0.01). However, no significant difference was found for pain scores, hospital stay or return to work.

CONCLUSION

The current published literature supports the use of the rhomboid flap excision and the Limberg flap-repair procedures over primary midline suture techniques for the elective management of primary pilonidal disease. Further high-quality studies are necessary to compare flap with off-midline repairs.

摘要

目的

藏毛窦疾病是一种常见的疾病,影响年轻的男性工作者和学生群体,导致相当大的痛苦、尴尬和工作天数的损失。对于实现低复发率的最佳手术方法存在争议,同时最大限度地减少发病率并允许尽早返回工作岗位。本研究旨在回顾比较切除后行一期缝合或菱形皮瓣修复的已发表文献。

方法

两名独立的研究者通过系统回顾 PubMed、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 The Cochrane Library,检索相关的随机对照试验。关键词和 MeSH 术语包括“藏毛窦疾病”、“一期缝合/修复”、“菱形皮瓣”和“Limberg/改良 Limberg 皮瓣”。还搜索了“相关研究”功能和手稿参考文献,以寻找其他相关研究。使用 Jadad 评分评估研究质量。当异质性高时,使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,当异质性低时,使用固定效应模型进行荟萃分析。主要终点评估疾病复发。次要终点包括伤口裂开、疼痛评分、住院时间和重返工作岗位。

结果

在排除方法学较差的随机对照试验后,最终有 6 项研究纳入荟萃分析。其中 2 项研究比较了“非中线”(Karydakis)一期缝合与 Limberg 皮瓣修复。共纳入 641 例患者(331 例皮瓣修复)。菱形皮瓣切除显示出疾病复发率降低的趋势(P = 0.07)、伤口感染(P = 0.001)和裂开(P = 0.01)的发生率较低。然而,疼痛评分、住院时间或重返工作岗位方面没有显著差异。

结论

目前的已发表文献支持在选择性治疗原发性藏毛窦疾病时,使用菱形皮瓣切除和 Limberg 皮瓣修复术,而不是中线一期缝合技术。需要进一步的高质量研究来比较皮瓣与非中线修复。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验