Suppr超能文献

家庭治疗性营养用于严重急性营养不良的治疗营养产品的疗效和安全性:系统评价。

Efficacy and safety of therapeutic nutrition products for home based therapeutic nutrition for severe acute malnutrition a systematic review.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, Fortis Hospital, Shalimar Bagh, New Delhi, India.

出版信息

Indian Pediatr. 2010 Aug;47(8):709-18. doi: 10.1007/s13312-010-0095-1.

Abstract

CONTEXT

Severe acute malnutrition (SAM) in children is a significant public health problem in India with associated increased morbidity and mortality. The current WHO recommendations on management of SAM are based on facility based treatment. Given the large number of children with SAM in India and the involved costs to the care-provider as well as the care-seeker, incorporation of alternative strategies like home based management of uncomplicated SAM is important. The present review assesses (a) the efficacy and safety of home based management of SAM using therapeutic nutrition products or ready to use therapeutic foods (RUTF); and (b) efficacy of these products in comparison with F-100 and home-based diet.

EVIDENCE ACQUISITION

Electronic database (Pubmed and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register) were scanned using keywords severe malnutrition, therapy, diet, ready to use foods and RUTF. Bibliographics of identified articles, reviews and books were scanned. The information was extracted from the identified papers and graded according to the CEBM guidelines.

RESULTS

Eighteen published papers (2 systematic reviews, 7 controlled trials, 7 observational trials and 2 consensus statements) were identified. Systematic reviews and RCTs showed RUTF to be at least as efficacious as F-100 in increasing weight (WMD=3.0 g/kg/day; 95% CI -1.70, 7.70) and more effective in comparison to home based dietary therapies. Locally made RUTFs were as effective as imported RUTFs (WMD=0.07 g/kg/d; 95% CI=-0.15, 0.29). Data from observational studies showed the energy intake with RUTF to be comparable to F-100. The pooled recovery rate, mortality and default in treatment with RUTF was 88.3%, 0.7% and 3.6%, respectively with a mean weight gain of 3.2 g/kg/day. The two consensus statements supported the use of RUTF for home based management of uncomplicated SAM.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of therapeutic nutrition products like RUTF for home based management of uncomplicated SAM appears to be safe and efficacious. However, most of the evidence on this promising strategy has emerged from observational studies conducted in emergency settings in Africa. There is need to generate more robust evidence, design similar products locally and establish their efficacy and cost-effectiveness in a non-emergency setting, particularly in the Indian context.

摘要

背景

儿童严重急性营养不良(SAM)是印度一个严重的公共卫生问题,与发病率和死亡率的增加有关。目前世卫组织关于 SAM 管理的建议是基于医疗机构的治疗。鉴于印度有大量 SAM 患儿,以及对提供者和寻求者的成本,纳入替代性策略,如在家中管理无并发症 SAM 非常重要。本综述评估了:(a)使用治疗性营养产品或即食治疗食品(RUTF)在家中管理 SAM 的疗效和安全性;以及(b)与 F-100 和家庭饮食相比,这些产品的疗效。

证据获取

使用关键字严重营养不良、治疗、饮食、即食食品和 RUTF 扫描电子数据库(Pubmed 和 Cochrane 对照试验登记处)。扫描已确定文章、综述和书籍的参考书目。从已确定的论文中提取信息,并根据 CEBM 指南进行分级。

结果

确定了 18 篇已发表的论文(2 篇系统评价、7 项对照试验、7 项观察性试验和 2 项共识声明)。系统评价和 RCT 表明,RUTF 在增加体重方面至少与 F-100 同样有效(WMD=3.0g/kg/天;95%CI-1.70,7.70),并且与家庭饮食治疗相比更有效。本地生产的 RUTF 与进口 RUTF 一样有效(WMD=0.07g/kg/d;95%CI-0.15,0.29)。观察性研究的数据显示,RUTF 的能量摄入量与 F-100 相当。RUTF 的总恢复率、死亡率和治疗中断率分别为 88.3%、0.7%和 3.6%,平均体重增加 3.2g/kg/天。这两项共识声明支持使用 RUTF 在家中管理无并发症 SAM。

结论

使用治疗性营养产品,如 RUTF,在家中管理无并发症 SAM 似乎是安全和有效的。然而,关于这一有希望的策略的大部分证据来自非洲紧急情况下进行的观察性研究。有必要生成更有力的证据,设计类似的产品并在非紧急情况下确定其疗效和成本效益,特别是在印度的背景下。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验