Deo Vikas, Bhongade M L
Department of Periodontics and Implant Dentistry, Sharad Pawar Dental College and Hospital, Deemed University, Sawangi (Meghe), Wardha, Maharashtra State, India.
Dent Today. 2010 Sep;29(9):60-2, 64-6; quiz 68-9.
There is no doubt that plaque bacteria are necessary to initiate disease and drive the chronic inflammatory response in the periodontal tissues. At the same time, there is strong evidence that destructive processes occurring as part of the host inflammatory response are responsible for the majority of the hard- and soft-tissue breakdown leading to the clinical signs of periodontitis. The characteristic clinical signs of chronic periodontitis occur mainly as a result of activation of host-derived immune and inflammatory defense mechanism. IL-1 and TNF induce expression of other mediators that amplify the inflammatory response, such as prostaglandins, and lead to production of lytic enzymes and stimulate the production of chemokines. Investigations on the soluble protein delivery of antagonists to IL-1 and TNF in animal models have shown promising results. Collectively, the clinical, radiographic, and biochemical findings of these experiments show that IL-1 and TNF-alpha antagonists block the progression of the inflammatory cell infiltrate towards the alveolar crest and the recruitment of osteoclasts, and prevent the periodontal lesions may destroy the soluble cytokine antagonists prior to their peak activity, which may necessitate more frequent administration of the active agents to the defects. Thus, gene transfer of TNF receptor antagonists and IL-1ra may offer a more efficient mode of delivery of disease controlling agents to the periodontal structures. Periodontal treatment through the ages has focused on the reduction of bacterial infection by mechanical removal of infectious agents (i.e., SRP). Attempts at elimination of infectious agents often do not represent a definitive therapy in periodontitis, necessitating the administration of more sophisticated biological treatment modalities. A thorough understanding of the host inflammatory response in periodontal pathogenesis presents the opportunity for exploiting new treatment strategies for periodontitis by means of host response modulation. The rationale behind this approach is to aid the host in its fight against infectious agents by supplementing the natural inherent defense mechanism or to modify its responses by changing the course of inflammatory systems. Therefore, pharmaceutical inhibition of host response pathways that mimic endogenous anti-inflammatory mechanisms may prove to be an effective strategy for treating periodontal diseases. This would require the development of polypharmaceutical approaches controlling all pathways associated with inflammation and tissue destruction. Current research has focused on the use of SDD as a treatment modality, and SDD is the only systemically used host modulatory drug approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration.
毫无疑问,菌斑细菌是引发疾病并驱动牙周组织慢性炎症反应所必需的。与此同时,有强有力的证据表明,作为宿主炎症反应一部分而发生的破坏过程是导致牙周炎临床症状的大部分软硬组织破坏的原因。慢性牙周炎的典型临床症状主要是宿主源性免疫和炎症防御机制激活的结果。白细胞介素-1(IL-1)和肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)诱导其他介导物的表达,这些介导物会放大炎症反应,如前列腺素,并导致溶酶体酶的产生,刺激趋化因子的产生。在动物模型中对IL-1和TNF拮抗剂的可溶性蛋白递送进行的研究已显示出有希望的结果。总体而言,这些实验的临床、影像学和生化结果表明,IL-1和TNF-α拮抗剂可阻断炎症细胞浸润向牙槽嵴的进展以及破骨细胞的募集,并防止牙周病变,但可能在可溶性细胞因子拮抗剂达到其峰值活性之前就将其破坏,这可能需要更频繁地向缺损部位施用活性剂。因此,TNF受体拮抗剂和IL-1受体拮抗剂(IL-1ra)的基因转移可能提供一种更有效的将疾病控制剂递送至牙周结构的方式。长期以来,牙周治疗一直侧重于通过机械清除感染源(即龈下刮治术,SRP)来减少细菌感染。消除感染源的尝试在牙周炎中往往并不代表一种确定性的治疗方法,因此需要采用更复杂的生物治疗方式。深入了解牙周病发病机制中的宿主炎症反应为通过调节宿主反应来开发牙周炎的新治疗策略提供了机会。这种方法背后的基本原理是通过补充天然固有防御机制来帮助宿主对抗感染源,或者通过改变炎症系统的进程来改变其反应。因此,模拟内源性抗炎机制对宿主反应途径进行药物抑制可能被证明是治疗牙周病的有效策略。这将需要开发控制与炎症和组织破坏相关的所有途径的多药联合方法。目前的研究集中在使用宿主调节药物(SDD)作为一种治疗方式,并且SDD是美国食品药品监督管理局批准的唯一一种全身使用的宿主调节药物。