• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

非神经系统原因导致的急性重度高血压患者的降压治疗模式:研究急性高血压治疗(STAT)登记研究。

Patterns of antihypertensive treatment in patients with acute severe hypertension from a nonneurologic cause: Studying the Treatment of Acute Hypertension (STAT) registry.

机构信息

Northeastern University School of Pharmacy, Boston, Massachusetts 02115, USA.

出版信息

Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Nov;30(11):1087-96. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.11.1087.

DOI:10.1592/phco.30.11.1087
PMID:20973682
Abstract

STUDY OBJECTIVE

To assess antihypertensive treatment practices and outcomes for patients with acute severe hypertension requiring hospitalization.

DESIGN

Subanalysis of a multicenter, observational, cross-sectional study.

DATA SOURCE

The STAT registry (data from 25 hospitals).

PATIENTS

A total of 1184 consecutive adults with acute severe hypertension (systolic blood pressure [SBP] ≥ 180 mm Hg, diastolic blood pressure ≥ 110 mm Hg), without a neurologic reason for admission, receiving two or more intermittent intravenous antihypertensive doses or a continuous intravenous infusion within 24 hours of hospitalization.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Patients started intravenous antihypertensive therapy 1.3 (median [interquartile range (IQR) 0.5-3.2]) hours after the qualifying SBP (median 204 [IQR 190-221] mm Hg). Labetalol (27%), metoprolol (21%), and nitroglycerin (20%) were the most frequent initial intravenous choices. For the 43% of patients administered two or more intravenous agents sequentially, the 24% receiving three or more, and the 8% receiving four or more, median SBPs at the time of the second, third, and fourth additions were 186 (IQR 168-211), 176 (IQR 152-196), and 164 (IQR 143-193) mm Hg, respectively. Most common continuous intravenous infusions were nitroglycerin (30%), nicardipine (13%), and labetalol (7%). After the first intravenous agent, an SBP decrease of 10-25% was achieved at 1 and 6 hours in 48% and 72%, respectively. Of the 6% without at least a 10% decrease in SBP during the entire hospitalization, labetalol (28%), hydralazine (21%), and metoprolol (17%) were the most frequent initial intravenous choices. Hypotension (SBP ≤ 90 mm Hg) occurred in 5% and was most common with intravenous nitroglycerin (39%). Oral antihypertensives were started within 1 and 6 hours after the first intravenous therapy in 13% and 34% of patients, respectively, with many patients (61%) receiving three or more oral agents during hospitalization.

CONCLUSION

Pharmacologic treatment of acute severe hypertension in patients with nonneurologic causes is heterogeneous and often not consistent with Joint National Committee recommendations. Patients received numerous intravenous agents, experienced variable decreases in SBP, often failed to receive timely oral therapy, and a clinically relevant proportion developed hypotension.

摘要

研究目的

评估需要住院的急性重度高血压患者的降压治疗实践和结果。

设计

多中心、观察性、横断面研究的亚分析。

资料来源

STAT 登记处(来自 25 家医院的数据)。

患者

共纳入 1184 例连续的急性重度高血压成人患者(收缩压 [SBP]≥180mmHg,舒张压≥110mmHg),无神经原因入院,在入院后 24 小时内接受两次或更多次间歇性静脉内降压治疗或连续静脉内输注。

测量和主要结果

患者在符合 SBP 标准后的 1.3 小时(中位数 [四分位距(IQR)0.5-3.2])开始静脉内降压治疗。最常初始使用的静脉内药物是拉贝洛尔(27%)、美托洛尔(21%)和硝酸甘油(20%)。对于 43%接受序贯两种或更多种静脉内药物的患者,24%接受三种或更多种药物,8%接受四种或更多种药物,在第二次、第三次和第四次添加时的中位数 SBP 分别为 186(IQR 168-211)、176(IQR 152-196)和 164(IQR 143-193)mmHg。最常用的连续静脉输注药物是硝酸甘油(30%)、尼卡地平(13%)和拉贝洛尔(7%)。在第一次静脉内药物治疗后,1 小时和 6 小时时,SBP 降低 10%-25%的比例分别为 48%和 72%。在整个住院期间,SBP 降低幅度没有达到至少 10%的患者占 6%,其中拉贝洛尔(28%)、肼屈嗪(21%)和美托洛尔(17%)是最常使用的初始静脉内药物。低血压(SBP≤90mmHg)的发生率为 5%,最常见于静脉内使用硝酸甘油(39%)。在第一次静脉内治疗后 1 小时和 6 小时,分别有 13%和 34%的患者开始口服降压药,许多患者(61%)在住院期间接受了三种或更多种口服药物。

结论

非神经原因的急性重度高血压患者的药物治疗存在异质性,且往往不符合联合国家委员会的建议。患者接受了多种静脉内药物治疗,SBP 下降程度不同,经常未能及时接受口服治疗,且有临床相关比例的患者出现低血压。

相似文献

1
Patterns of antihypertensive treatment in patients with acute severe hypertension from a nonneurologic cause: Studying the Treatment of Acute Hypertension (STAT) registry.非神经系统原因导致的急性重度高血压患者的降压治疗模式:研究急性高血压治疗(STAT)登记研究。
Pharmacotherapy. 2010 Nov;30(11):1087-96. doi: 10.1592/phco.30.11.1087.
2
Practice patterns, outcomes, and end-organ dysfunction for patients with acute severe hypertension: the Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (STAT) registry.急性重症高血压患者的治疗模式、结局及终末器官功能障碍:急性高血压治疗研究(STAT)注册研究
Am Heart J. 2009 Oct;158(4):599-606.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2009.07.020.
3
Predictors of 90-day readmission among patients with acute severe hypertension. The cross-sectional observational Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (STAT) study.急性重度高血压患者 90 天再入院的预测因素。横断面观察性 Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension (STAT) 研究。
Am Heart J. 2010 Sep;160(3):521-527.e1. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2010.06.032.
4
Poor blood pressure control in general practice: in search of explanations.全科医疗中血压控制不佳:探寻原因
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2009 Jun-Jul;102(6-7):477-83. doi: 10.1016/j.acvd.2009.02.013. Epub 2009 Apr 28.
5
Clinical practices, complications, and mortality in neurological patients with acute severe hypertension: the Studying the Treatment of Acute hyperTension registry.急性严重高血压神经科患者的临床实践、并发症和死亡率:急性高血压治疗研究登记。
Crit Care Med. 2011 Oct;39(10):2330-6. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3182227238.
6
Diuretics for hypertension--an inconsistency in primary care prescribing behaviour.高血压利尿剂的使用——初级保健处方行为的不一致性。
Curr Med Res Opin. 2011 Mar;27(3):497-502. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2010.547932. Epub 2011 Jan 6.
7
Gender differences in hypertension treatment, drug utilization patterns, and blood pressure control among US adults with hypertension: data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 1999-2004.美国高血压成人患者在高血压治疗、药物使用模式及血压控制方面的性别差异:来自1999 - 2004年国家健康与营养检查调查的数据
Am J Hypertens. 2008 Jul;21(7):789-98. doi: 10.1038/ajh.2008.185. Epub 2008 May 1.
8
Antihypertensive medication changes and blood pressure goal achievement in a managed care population.在管理式医疗人群中,降压药物的改变与血压目标的实现。
J Hum Hypertens. 2010 Oct;24(10):659-68. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2010.2. Epub 2010 Jan 28.
9
Blood pressure and antihypertensive therapy according to the global cardiovascular risk level in Italy: the CHECK Study.意大利根据全球心血管风险水平进行的血压与抗高血压治疗:CHECK研究
Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2010 Oct;17(5):562-8. doi: 10.1097/HJR.0b013e328338a4c6.
10
Blood pressure control and drug therapy in patients with diagnosed hypertension: a survey in Italian general practice.已确诊高血压患者的血压控制与药物治疗:一项意大利全科医疗调查
J Hum Hypertens. 2009 Nov;23(11):758-63. doi: 10.1038/jhh.2009.14. Epub 2009 Feb 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Retrospective review of the use of as-needed hydralazine and labetalol for the treatment of acute hypertension in hospitalized medicine patients.对住院内科患者按需使用肼屈嗪和拉贝洛尔治疗急性高血压的回顾性研究。
Ther Adv Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jan;12(1):7-15. doi: 10.1177/1753944717746613.
2
The efficacy and safety of intravenous hydralazine for the treatment of hypertension in the hospitalized child.静脉注射肼屈嗪治疗住院儿童高血压的疗效与安全性。
Pediatr Nephrol. 2014 Aug;29(8):1403-9. doi: 10.1007/s00467-014-2772-0. Epub 2014 Feb 20.
3
Association between in-hospital acute hypertensive episodes and outcomes in older trauma patients.
Intern Emerg Med. 2014 Aug;9(5):553-8. doi: 10.1007/s11739-013-0984-0. Epub 2013 Aug 24.
4
48-year-old man with cough and leg swelling.48岁男性,伴有咳嗽和腿部肿胀。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2012 Dec;87(12):e105-8. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2012.06.025.
5
Intravenous hydralazine for blood pressure management in the hospitalized patient: its use is often unjustified.静脉注射肼屈嗪用于住院患者的血压管理:其使用往往不合理。
J Am Soc Hypertens. 2011 Nov-Dec;5(6):473-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jash.2011.07.002. Epub 2011 Sep 3.