Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, St Mary's Hospital, Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust, London, United Kingdom.
J Vasc Surg. 2010 Dec;52(6):1700-5. doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2010.08.015. Epub 2010 Oct 25.
Patient-specific virtual reality (VR) simulation is a technologic advancement that allows planning and practice of the carotid artery stenting (CAS) procedure before it is performed on the patient. The initial findings are reported, using this novel VR technique as a tool to optimize technical and nontechnical aspects of this complex endovascular procedure.
In the angiography suite, the same interventional team performed the VR rehearsal and the actual CAS on the patient. All proceedings were recorded to allow for video analysis of team, technical, and nontechnical skills.
Analysis of both procedures showed identical use of endovascular tools, similar access strategy, and a high degree of similarity between the angiography images. The total procedure time (24.04 vs 60.44 minutes), fluoroscopy time (11.19 vs 21.04 minutes), and cannulation of the common carotid artery (1.35 vs 9.34) took considerably longer in reality. An extensive questionnaire revealed that all team members found that the rehearsal increased the subjective sense of teamwork (4/5), communication (4/5), and patient safety (4/5).
A VR procedure rehearsal is a practical and feasible preparatory tool for CAS and shows a high correlation with the real procedure. It has the potential to enhance the technical, nontechnical, and team performance. Further research is needed to evaluate if this technology can lead to improved outcomes for patients.
患者特异性虚拟现实(VR)模拟是一种技术进步,允许在对患者进行颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)之前规划和练习该手术。本文报告了初步研究结果,使用这种新型 VR 技术作为工具来优化该复杂血管内手术的技术和非技术方面。
在血管造影室,同一介入团队在患者身上进行 VR 预演和实际的 CAS。所有程序均被记录下来,以便对团队、技术和非技术技能进行视频分析。
对这两个程序的分析都显示出使用血管内工具完全相同,相似的入路策略,以及造影图像之间高度相似。实际操作中,总手术时间(24.04 分钟比 60.44 分钟)、透视时间(11.19 分钟比 21.04 分钟)和颈总动脉穿刺(1.35 分钟比 9.34 分钟)都明显更长。一项广泛的问卷调查显示,所有团队成员都认为预演增加了团队合作的主观意识(4/5)、沟通(4/5)和患者安全(4/5)。
VR 手术预演是 CAS 的一种实用且可行的准备工具,与真实手术具有高度相关性。它有可能提高技术、非技术和团队表现。需要进一步研究来评估该技术是否可以为患者带来更好的结果。