Suppr超能文献

高效实施颈动脉支架置入术患者特异性模拟演练:部分任务演练。

Efficient implementation of patient-specific simulated rehearsal for the carotid artery stenting procedure: part-task rehearsal.

机构信息

Department of Biosurgery and Surgical Technology, Imperial College London, St. Mary's Hospital, London, UK.

出版信息

Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg. 2011 Aug;42(2):158-66. doi: 10.1016/j.ejvs.2011.03.032. Epub 2011 May 25.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE(S): Patient-specific simulated rehearsal (PsR) is a technological advance within the domain of endovascular virtual reality (VR) simulation. It allows incorporation of patient-specific computed tomography Digital Imaging and Communications in Medicine (CT DICOM) data into the simulation and subsequent rehearsal of real patient cases. This study aimed to evaluate whether a part-task rehearsal (PTr) of a carotid artery stenting procedure (CAS) on a VR simulator is as effective as a full-task (FTr) preoperative run through.

METHODS

Medical trainees were trained in the CAS procedure and randomised to a PTr or FTr of a challenging CAS case (Type-II arch). PTr consisted of 30 min of repeated catheterisations of the common carotid artery (CCA). Thereafter, both groups performed the CAS procedure in a fully functional simulated operating suite (SOS) with an interventional team. Technical performances were assessed using simulator-based metrics and expert ratings. Other aspects of performance were assessed using the Non-Technical Skills for Surgeons (NOTSS) scoring.

RESULTS

Twenty trainees were evenly randomised to either PTr or FTr. No differences in performance were seen except for the total time the embolic protection device (EPD) was deployed (9.4 min for the PT vs. 8.1 min for the FT, p = 0.02). Total time (26.3 vs. 25.5 min, p = 0.94), fluoroscopy time (15.8 vs. 14.4 min, p = 0.68), number of roadmaps (10.5 vs. 11.0, p = 0.54), amount of contrast (53.5 vs. 58.0 ml, p = 0.33), time to deploy the EPD (0.9 vs. 0.8 min, p = 0.31) and time to catheterise the CCA (9.2 vs. 8.9 min, p = 0.94) were similar. Qualitative performances as measured by expert ratings (score 24 vs. 24, p = 0.49) and NOTSS (p > 0.05 for all categories) were also comparable.

CONCLUSIONS

Part- and full-task rehearsals are equally effective with respect to the operative performance of a simulated CAS intervention. This finding makes a patient-specific rehearsal more efficient and may increase the feasibility of implementation of this technology into medical practice.

摘要

目的

患者特定模拟演练(PsR)是血管内虚拟现实(VR)模拟领域的一项技术进步。它允许将患者特定的计算机断层成像数字成像和通信(CT DICOM)数据纳入模拟,并随后对真实患者病例进行演练。本研究旨在评估颈动脉支架置入术(CAS)的部分任务演练(PTr)是否与全任务(FTr)术前预演一样有效。

方法

医学受训者接受了 CAS 手术的培训,并随机分为 PTr 或 FTr 进行具有挑战性的 CAS 病例(II 型弓)。PTr 包括 30 分钟的反复进行颈总动脉(CCA)导管插入术。此后,两组均在具有介入团队的全功能模拟手术套件(SOS)中进行 CAS 手术。使用基于模拟器的指标和专家评分评估技术表现。使用非技术技能评分(NOTSS)评估其他方面的表现。

结果

20 名受训者被平均随机分配到 PTr 或 FTr。除栓塞保护装置(EPD)的总部署时间外(PT 为 9.4 分钟,FT 为 8.1 分钟,p = 0.02),两组之间未见性能差异。总时间(PT 为 26.3 分钟,FT 为 25.5 分钟,p = 0.94)、透视时间(PT 为 15.8 分钟,FT 为 14.4 分钟,p = 0.68)、 roadmap 数量(PT 为 10.5 个,FT 为 11.0 个,p = 0.54)、造影剂用量(PT 为 53.5 毫升,FT 为 58.0 毫升,p = 0.33)、EPD 部署时间(PT 为 0.9 分钟,FT 为 0.8 分钟,p = 0.31)和 CCA 导管插入时间(PT 为 9.2 分钟,FT 为 8.9 分钟,p = 0.94)相似。通过专家评分(得分为 24 分,p = 0.49)和 NOTSS(所有类别得分均大于 0.05)测量的定性表现也相当。

结论

就模拟 CAS 干预的手术表现而言,部分任务和全任务演练同样有效。这一发现使患者特定的演练更加高效,并可能增加将这项技术实施到医疗实践中的可行性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验