Department of Surgery, University Hospitals Case Medical Center, Case Comprehensive Hernia Center, Case Western Reserve University School of Medicine, 11100 Euclid Ave, Mailstop 5047, Cleveland, OH 44106, USA.
Surg Endosc. 2011 May;25(5):1446-51. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1412-4. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
Thirty-day readmission has become an increasingly scrutinized event in the field of surgery, especially in light of projected cuts in reimbursement. Although studies have evaluated large populations, little work has been done on procedure-specific populations. Our objective is to determine if any factors are predictive of 30-day readmission in patients undergoing ventral hernia repair.
We retrospectively reviewed the charts of all patients who underwent laparoscopic or open ventral hernia repair over a 4-year period. We evaluated patients based on demographic, preoperative, and operative variables. The primary outcome measure was all-cause 30-day readmission.
There were 420 patients identified for evaluation. Fifty-one (12%) patients required readmission to the hospital within 30 days. The most common indications for readmission were wound infection (57%; n=29) and gastrointestinal (GI) complication (19%; n=10). On analysis, demographic variables were similar between the two groups. However, patients who were readmitted were more likely to have had more prior abdominal surgeries (4 vs. 2; p<0.0001), more previous hernia repairs (2 vs. 1; p=0.006), open repair (76% vs. 46%; p<0.0001), and active abdominal infection (37% vs. 12%; p<0.0001). In addition, patients also had longer procedures (235 vs. 150 min; p<0.0001) and larger defects (350 vs. 96 cm2; p<0.0001). On multivariate analysis, independent predictors of readmission included presence of fistula [odds ratio (OR)=8.55; 95% confidence interval (CI) 3.21-22.72], defect size>300 cm2 (OR=5.35; 95% CI 2.59-11.05), active abdominal infection (OR=4.37; 95% CI 2.28-8.37), and open repair (OR=4.27; 95% CI 2.17-8.42).
Patients undergoing ventral hernia repair can represent a complex group. In our practice, enterocutaneous fistula, defect size>300 cm2, active abdominal infection, and open repair were all independent risk factors (OR>4) for 30-day readmission after ventral hernia repair. Recognition of these high-risk patients can help focus resources to increase surveillance and possible early intervention to reduce readmissions.
30 天再入院已成为外科领域中受到越来越多审查的事件,尤其是在预期报销削减的情况下。尽管已经对大量人群进行了研究,但针对特定手术人群的研究很少。我们的目的是确定在接受腹疝修补术的患者中,哪些因素与 30 天再入院相关。
我们回顾性分析了 4 年内接受腹腔镜或开放式腹疝修补术的所有患者的病历。我们根据人口统计学、术前和手术变量评估患者。主要结局指标为全因 30 天再入院。
共确定了 420 例患者进行评估。51 例(12%)患者在 30 天内需要再次住院。再入院的最常见原因是伤口感染(57%;n=29)和胃肠道(GI)并发症(19%;n=10)。分析显示,两组患者的人口统计学变量相似。然而,再入院的患者更有可能有更多的既往腹部手术(4 次与 2 次;p<0.0001)、更多的既往疝修补术(2 次与 1 次;p=0.006)、开放性修复术(76%与 46%;p<0.0001)和活动性腹部感染(37%与 12%;p<0.0001)。此外,患者的手术时间也更长(235 分钟与 150 分钟;p<0.0001),缺损面积更大(350 平方厘米与 96 平方厘米;p<0.0001)。多变量分析显示,再入院的独立预测因素包括瘘管存在[比值比(OR)=8.55;95%置信区间(CI)3.21-22.72]、缺损面积>300 平方厘米(OR=5.35;95% CI 2.59-11.05)、活动性腹部感染(OR=4.37;95% CI 2.28-8.37)和开放性修复术(OR=4.27;95% CI 2.17-8.42)。
接受腹疝修补术的患者可能代表一个复杂的群体。在我们的实践中,肠皮肤瘘、缺损面积>300 平方厘米、活动性腹部感染和开放性修复术是腹疝修补术后 30 天再入院的独立危险因素(OR>4)。识别这些高危患者有助于集中资源,增加监测,并可能早期干预以减少再入院。