Suppr超能文献

一项比较腹腔镜与开放性腹疝修补术并发症发生率的前瞻性研究。

A prospective study comparing the complication rates between laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

作者信息

McGreevy J M, Goodney P P, Birkmeyer C M, Finlayson S R G, Laycock W S, Birkmeyer J D

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, NH, USA.

出版信息

Surg Endosc. 2003 Nov;17(11):1778-80. doi: 10.1007/s00464-002-8851-5. Epub 2003 Sep 10.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Although ventral hernia repair is increasingly performed laparoscopically, complication rates with this procedure are not well characterized. For this reason, we performed a prospective study comparing early outcomes after laparoscopic and open ventral hernia repairs.

METHODS

We identified all the patients undergoing ventral (including incisional) hernia repair at a single tertiary care center between September 1, 1999 and July 1, 2001 (overall n = 257). To increase the homogeneity of the sample, we excluded umbilical hernia repairs, parastomal hernia repairs, nonelective procedures, procedures not involving mesh, and repairs performed concurrently with another surgical procedure. Postoperative complications (in-hospital or within 30-days) were assessed prospectively according to standardized definitions by trained nurse clinicians.

RESULTS

Of the 136 ventral hernia repairs that met the study criteria, 65 (48%) were laparoscopic repairs (including 3 conversions to open surgery) and 71 (52%) were open repairs. The patients in the laparoscopic group were more likely to have undergone a prior (failed) ventral hernia repair (40% vs 27%; p = 0.14), but other patient characteristics were similar between the two groups. Overall, fewer complications were experienced by patients undergoing laparoscopic repair (8% vs 21%; p = 0.03). The higher complication rate in the open ventral hernia repair group came from wound infections (8%) and postoperative ileus (4%), neither of which was observed in the patients who underwent laparoscopic repair. The laparoscopic group had longer operating room times (2.2 vs 1.7 h; p = 0.001), and there was a nonsignificant trend toward shorter hospital stays with laparoscopic repair (1.1 vs 1.5 days; p = 0.10).

CONCLUSIONS

The patients undergoing laparoscopic repair had fewer postoperative complications than those receiving open repair. Wound infections and postoperative ileus accounted for the higher complication rates in the open ventral hernia repair group. Otherwise, these groups were very similar. Long-term studies assessing hernia recurrence rates will be required to help determine the optimal approach to ventral hernia repair.

摘要

背景

尽管腹疝修补术越来越多地通过腹腔镜进行,但该手术的并发症发生率尚未得到充分描述。因此,我们进行了一项前瞻性研究,比较腹腔镜和开放腹疝修补术后的早期结果。

方法

我们确定了1999年9月1日至2001年7月1日期间在一家三级医疗中心接受腹(包括切口)疝修补术的所有患者(总数n = 257)。为了提高样本的同质性,我们排除了脐疝修补术、造口旁疝修补术、非选择性手术、不涉及补片的手术以及与另一台外科手术同时进行的修补术。术后并发症(住院期间或30天内)由经过培训的护士临床医生根据标准化定义进行前瞻性评估。

结果

在符合研究标准的136例腹疝修补术中,65例(48%)为腹腔镜修补术(包括3例转为开放手术),71例(52%)为开放修补术。腹腔镜组患者更有可能曾接受过(失败的)腹疝修补术(40%对27%;p = 0.14),但两组的其他患者特征相似。总体而言,接受腹腔镜修补术的患者出现的并发症较少(8%对21%;p = 0.03)。开放腹疝修补术组较高的并发症发生率来自伤口感染(8%)和术后肠梗阻(4%),而接受腹腔镜修补术的患者均未出现这些情况。腹腔镜组的手术时间更长(2.2小时对1.7小时;p = 0.001),腹腔镜修补术的住院时间有缩短的趋势,但差异无统计学意义(1.1天对1.5天;p = 0.10)。

结论

接受腹腔镜修补术的患者术后并发症比接受开放修补术的患者少。伤口感染和术后肠梗阻是开放腹疝修补术组并发症发生率较高的原因。除此之外,这两组非常相似。需要进行评估疝复发率的长期研究,以帮助确定腹疝修补术的最佳方法。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验