Universidad de La Coruña, Departamento de Psicología Evolutiva y de la Educación, Campus de Elviña s/n, 15071 La Coruña, Spain.
Span J Psychol. 2010 Nov;13(2):538-56. doi: 10.1017/s1138741600002237.
Twelve cerebral palsied adolescents and young adults with complex communicative needs who used augmentative and alternative communication were studied. They were classified according to their working memory capacity (high vs. low) into two groups of 6 participants. They were also divided into two groups of 6 participants according to their high vs. low phonological skills. These groups were compared on their performance in reading tests -orthographic knowledge, a word test and a pseudoword reading test- and in the spelling of words, pseudowords and pictures' names. Statistical differences were found between high vs. low phonological skills groups, and between high and low working memory groups. High working memory capacity group scored significantly higher than low working memory group in the orthographic and word reading tests. The high phonological skills group outperformed the low phonological skills group in the word reading test and in the spelling of pseudowords and pictures' names. From a descriptive point of view, phonological skills and working memory, factors known to be highly predictive of literacy skills in people without disabilities, also hold as factors for the participants that used AAC in our study. Implications of the results are discussed.
研究了 12 名患有脑瘫的青少年和青年,他们有复杂的沟通需求,并使用了辅助和替代性沟通方式。根据他们的工作记忆能力(高或低),将他们分为两组,每组 6 名参与者。根据他们的语音技能(高或低),他们也被分为两组,每组 6 名参与者。然后对他们在阅读测试(正字法知识、单词测试和假词阅读测试)和单词、假词和图片名称的拼写方面的表现进行比较。在语音技能高/低组和工作记忆高/低组之间发现了统计学差异。在正字法和单词阅读测试中,高工作记忆能力组的得分明显高于低工作记忆能力组。在单词阅读测试和假词拼写以及图片名称拼写方面,高语音技能组的表现优于低语音技能组。从描述性的角度来看,语音技能和工作记忆,这些因素在非残疾人群中被认为是读写能力的高度预测因素,在我们的研究中,它们也是使用 AAC 的参与者的因素。讨论了结果的含义。