Suppr超能文献

[从放射科医生视角看血管外科与介入放射学之间日益模糊的界限]

[Diminishing boundaries between vascular surgery and interventional radiology from the view of a radiologist].

作者信息

Vorwerk D

机构信息

Institut für Diagnostische und Interventionelle Radiologie, Klinikum Ingolstadt, Krumenauerstrasse, 85049, Ingolstadt, Deutschland.

出版信息

Chirurg. 2010 Dec;81(12):1081-7. doi: 10.1007/s00104-010-1987-2.

Abstract

Vascular surgeons increasingly claim that percutaneous interventional treatment of peripheral arterial disease belongs to their discipline.In further medical training interventional radiology is exclusively bound to the discipline of radiology and necessitates a minimum of 250 procedures for valid qualification. Training in vascular surgery requires 25 endovascular procedures which do not, however, fulfill the criteria of percutaneous interventional procedures for a number of reasons.The desired expansion of vascular surgery to include the complete field of vascular medicine is not based on adequate specific training, is functionally unnecessary and not achievable for practical reasons. However, this desired expansion endangers the consensus of an interdisciplinary concept of treatment as represented by interdisciplinary vascular centers which offer a high level of competence.

摘要

血管外科医生越来越多地声称,外周动脉疾病的经皮介入治疗属于他们的学科范畴。在进一步的医学培训中,介入放射学仅隶属于放射学科,并且需要至少250例手术才能获得有效的资质认证。血管外科培训需要25例血管内手术,然而,由于多种原因,这些手术不符合经皮介入手术的标准。将血管外科扩展至涵盖整个血管医学领域的期望,并非基于充分的专业培训,在功能上并无必要,且出于实际原因无法实现。然而,这种期望的扩展危及了以提供高水平专业能力的跨学科血管中心所代表的跨学科治疗理念的共识。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验