• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Geographic access to hospice in the United States.美国的临终关怀地理可达性。
J Palliat Med. 2010 Nov;13(11):1331-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0209. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
2
Regional variations in geographic access to inpatient hospices and Place of death: A Population-based study in England, UK.区域差异对住院临终关怀和死亡地点的地理可达性:英国基于人群的研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Apr 17;15(4):e0231666. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0231666. eCollection 2020.
3
Community supply of hospice: does wealth play a role?社区临终关怀供应:财富是否起作用?
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2011 Jul;42(1):76-82. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2010.09.016. Epub 2011 Mar 23.
4
Factors that influence the presence of a hospice in a rural community.影响农村社区设立临终关怀机构的因素。
J Nurs Scholarsh. 2009;41(4):420-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1547-5069.2009.01310.x.
5
A Comparison of Hospice Care Utilization Between Rural and Urban Children in Appalachia: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis.阿巴拉契亚地区农村和城市儿童的临终关怀利用比较:地理信息系统分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Mar;41(3):288-294. doi: 10.1177/10499091231173415. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
6
Association of Hospice Agency Location and Neighborhood Socioeconomic Disadvantage in the U.S.美国临终关怀机构位置与社区社会经济劣势的关联
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Mar;41(3):309-317. doi: 10.1177/10499091231195319. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
7
Geographic distribution of hospice, homecare, and nursing home facilities and access to end-of-life care among persons living with HIV/AIDS in Appalachia.阿巴拉契亚地区艾滋病毒/艾滋病患者的临终关怀、家庭护理和养老院设施的地理分布和临终关怀的获得情况。
PLoS One. 2020 Dec 14;15(12):e0243814. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0243814. eCollection 2020.
8
Local Area Hospice Capacity and Rural Disparities in Hospice Use among Older Adults with Metastatic Breast Cancer.局部地区临终关怀能力与转移性乳腺癌老年患者接受临终关怀服务的农村差异。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Feb;26(2):182-190. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0227. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
9
National hospice survey results: for-profit status, community engagement, and service.国家临终关怀调查结果:营利性、社区参与和服务。
JAMA Intern Med. 2014 Apr;174(4):500-6. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2014.3.
10
Bridge the Gap: Addressing Rural End-of-Life Care Disparities and Access to Hospice Services.弥合差距:解决农村临终关怀服务差距和获得临终关怀服务的问题。
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2024 Oct;68(4):e280-e286. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.07.001. Epub 2024 Jul 30.

引用本文的文献

1
Variation in Palliative Care Program Performance for Patients With Metastatic Cancer.转移性癌症患者姑息治疗项目绩效的差异
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2025 Jan;69(1):23-33.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2024.10.021. Epub 2024 Oct 22.
2
Certificate of Need Laws in Health Care: Past, Present, and Future.医疗保健中的需求必要性证明法:过去、现在和未来。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241251937. doi: 10.1177/00469580241251937.
3
Place of care in the last three years of life for Medicare beneficiaries.医疗保险受益人生命最后三年的护理地点。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jan 25;24(1):91. doi: 10.1186/s12877-023-04610-w.
4
Trends and Determinants of Location of Death Due to Colorectal Cancer in the United States : A Nationwide Study.美国结直肠癌死亡地点的趋势和决定因素:一项全国性研究。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2024 Mar;31(3):1447-1454. doi: 10.1245/s10434-023-14337-y. Epub 2023 Oct 31.
5
Does Geography Play a Role in the Receipt of End-of-Life Care for Advanced Cancer Patients? Evidence from an Australian Local Health District Population-Based Study.地理因素是否会影响晚期癌症患者接受临终关怀的情况?来自澳大利亚地方卫生区基于人群的研究证据。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Nov;26(11):1453-1465. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0555. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
A Comparison of Hospice Care Utilization Between Rural and Urban Children in Appalachia: A Geographic Information Systems Analysis.阿巴拉契亚地区农村和城市儿童的临终关怀利用比较:地理信息系统分析。
Am J Hosp Palliat Care. 2024 Mar;41(3):288-294. doi: 10.1177/10499091231173415. Epub 2023 Apr 28.
7
Racial and ethnic disparities in end-of-life care for patients with oesophageal cancer: death trends over time.食管癌患者临终关怀中的种族和民族差异:随时间变化的死亡趋势
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2022 Dec 8;17:100401. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100401. eCollection 2023 Jan.
8
Defining a taxonomy of Medicare-funded home-based clinical care using claims data.使用索赔数据定义医疗保险资助的家庭临床护理分类法。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2023 Feb 6;23(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12913-023-09081-8.
9
Local Area Hospice Capacity and Rural Disparities in Hospice Use among Older Adults with Metastatic Breast Cancer.局部地区临终关怀能力与转移性乳腺癌老年患者接受临终关怀服务的农村差异。
J Palliat Med. 2023 Feb;26(2):182-190. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2022.0227. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
10
Utilizing the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research to Explore Palliative Care Program Implementation for American Indian and Alaska Natives throughout the United States.利用实施研究综合框架探索美国各地美国印第安人和阿拉斯加原住民的姑息治疗计划实施情况。
J Palliat Med. 2022 Apr;25(4):643-649. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2021.0451. Epub 2022 Jan 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Interdisciplinary staffing patterns: do for-profit and nonprofit hospices differ?跨学科人员配置模式:营利性和非营利性临终关怀机构是否存在差异?
J Palliat Med. 2010 Apr;13(4):389-94. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0306.
2
Geographic access to burn center hospitals.烧伤中心医院的地理可达性。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1774-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1548.
3
Racial differences in self-reported exposure to information about hospice care.报告的临终关怀信息接触方面的种族差异。
J Palliat Med. 2009 Oct;12(10):921-7. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2009.0066.
4
Hospice characteristics and the disenrollment of patients with cancer.临终关怀的特点和癌症患者的退出。
Health Serv Res. 2009 Dec;44(6):2004-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2009.01002.x. Epub 2009 Jul 27.
5
Racial disparity in hospice use in the United States in 2002.2002年美国临终关怀使用方面的种族差异。
Palliat Med. 2008 Apr;22(3):205-13. doi: 10.1177/0269216308089305.
6
Hospice care: what services do patients and their families receive?临终关怀:患者及其家人能获得哪些服务?
Health Serv Res. 2007 Aug;42(4):1672-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6773.2006.00685.x.
7
Access to home-based hospice care for rural populations: Identification of areas lacking service.农村人口获得居家临终关怀服务的情况:确定缺乏服务的地区。
J Palliat Med. 2006 Dec;9(6):1292-9. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2006.9.1292.
8
Do religious nonprofit and for-profit organizations respond differently to financial incentives? The hospice industry.宗教非营利组织和营利性组织对财务激励的反应是否不同?临终关怀行业。
J Health Econ. 2007 Mar 1;26(2):342-57. doi: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2006.09.003. Epub 2006 Nov 13.
9
Differences in hospice use between black and white patients during the period 1992 through 2000.1992年至2000年期间黑人和白人患者在临终关怀使用方面的差异。
Med Care. 2006 Aug;44(8):731-7. doi: 10.1097/01.mlr.0000215858.37118.65.
10
Driving times and distances to hospitals with percutaneous coronary intervention in the United States: implications for prehospital triage of patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction.美国前往具备经皮冠状动脉介入治疗能力医院的驾车时间和距离:对ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者院前分诊的影响
Circulation. 2006 Mar 7;113(9):1189-95. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.105.596346.

美国的临终关怀地理可达性。

Geographic access to hospice in the United States.

机构信息

Brookdale Department of Geriatrics and Palliative Medicine, Mount Sinai School of Medicine, New York, New York, USA.

出版信息

J Palliat Med. 2010 Nov;13(11):1331-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0209. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1089/jpm.2010.0209
PMID:20979524
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC3000898/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Despite a 41% increase in the number of hospices since 2000, more than 60% of Americans die without hospice care. Given that hospice care is predominantly home based, proximity to a hospice is important in ensuring access to hospice services. We estimated the proportion of the population living in communities within 30 and 60 minutes driving time of a hospice.

METHODS

We conducted a cross-sectional study of geographic access to U.S. hospices using the 2008 Medicare Provider of Services data, U.S. Census data, and ArcGIS software. We used multivariate logistic regression to identify gaps in hospice availability by community characteristics.

RESULTS

As of 2008, 88% of the population lived in communities within 30 minutes and 98% lived in communities within 60 minutes of a hospice. Mean time to the nearest hospice was 15 minutes and the range was 0 to 403 minutes. Community characteristics independently associated with greater geographic access to hospice included higher population density, higher median income, higher educational attainment, higher percentage of black residents, and the state not having a Certificate of Need policy. The percentage of each state's population living in communities more than 30 minutes from a hospice ranged from 0% to 48%.

CONCLUSIONS

Recent growth in the hospice industry has resulted in widespread geographic access to hospice care in the United States, although state and community level variation exists. Future research regarding variation and disparities in hospice use should focus on barriers other than geographic proximity to a hospice.

摘要

背景

尽管自 2000 年以来,临终关怀机构的数量增加了 41%,但仍有超过 60%的美国人在没有接受临终关怀的情况下死亡。鉴于临终关怀主要是在家庭中进行的,因此接近临终关怀机构对于确保获得临终关怀服务至关重要。我们估计了居住在距离临终关怀机构 30 分钟和 60 分钟车程内社区的人口比例。

方法

我们使用 2008 年医疗保险服务提供者数据、美国人口普查数据和 ArcGIS 软件,对美国临终关怀机构的地理可达性进行了横断面研究。我们使用多变量逻辑回归来确定社区特征与临终关怀可用性之间的差距。

结果

截至 2008 年,88%的人口居住在距离临终关怀机构 30 分钟车程内的社区,98%的人口居住在距离临终关怀机构 60 分钟车程内的社区。到最近的临终关怀机构的平均时间为 15 分钟,范围为 0 至 403 分钟。与更大的临终关怀地理可达性相关的社区特征包括人口密度更高、中位收入更高、教育程度更高、黑人居民比例更高以及该州没有《需求证明》政策。每个州的人口中,居住在距离临终关怀机构 30 分钟以上社区的比例从 0%到 48%不等。

结论

尽管存在州和社区层面的差异,但临终关怀行业的最近增长已经使美国普遍能够获得临终关怀服务。未来关于临终关怀使用的差异和不公平的研究应重点关注除接近临终关怀机构的地理障碍之外的其他障碍。