Suppr超能文献

烧伤中心医院的地理可达性。

Geographic access to burn center hospitals.

作者信息

Klein Matthew B, Kramer C Bradley, Nelson Jason, Rivara Frederick P, Gibran Nicole S, Concannon Thomas

机构信息

UW Burn Center, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98104, USA.

出版信息

JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1774-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1548.

Abstract

CONTEXT

The delivery of burn care is a resource-intensive endeavor that requires specialized personnel and equipment. The optimal geographic distribution of burn centers has long been debated; however, the current distribution of centers relative to geographic area and population is unknown.

OBJECTIVE

To estimate the proportion of the US population living within 1 and 2 hours by rotary air transport (helicopter) or ground transport of a burn care facility.

DESIGN AND SETTING

A cross-sectional analysis of geographic access to US burn centers utilizing the 2000 US census, road and speed limit data, the Atlas and Database of Air Medical Services database, and the 2008 American Burn Association Directory.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE

The proportion of state, regional, and national population living within 1 and 2 hours by air transport or ground transport of a burn care facility.

RESULTS

In 2008, there were 128 self-reported burn centers in the United States including 51 American Burn Association-verified centers. An estimated 25.1% and 46.3% of the US population live within 1 and 2 hours by ground transport, respectively, of a verified burn center. By air, 53.9% and 79.0% of the population live within 1 and 2 hours, respectively, of a verified center. There was significant regional variation in access to verified burn centers by both ground and rotary air transport. The greatest proportion of the population with access was highest in the northeast region and lowest in the southern United States.

CONCLUSION

Nearly 80% of the US population lives within 2 hours by ground or rotary air transport of a verified burn center; however, there is both state and regional variation in geographic access to these centers.

摘要

背景

烧伤护理的提供是一项资源密集型工作,需要专业人员和设备。烧伤中心的最佳地理分布长期以来一直存在争议;然而,目前烧伤中心相对于地理区域和人口的分布情况尚不清楚。

目的

估计美国人口中,通过直升机或地面运输在1小时和2小时内可到达烧伤护理设施的比例。

设计与设置

利用2000年美国人口普查、道路和限速数据、空中医疗服务数据库地图集及数据库以及2008年美国烧伤协会名录,对美国烧伤中心的地理可达性进行横断面分析。

主要观察指标

按空中运输或地面运输,在1小时和2小时内可到达烧伤护理设施的州、地区和全国人口比例。

结果

2008年,美国有128个自我报告的烧伤中心,其中包括51个经美国烧伤协会核实的中心。据估计,美国人口中分别有25.1%和46.3%在地面运输1小时和2小时内可到达经核实的烧伤中心。通过空中运输,分别有53.9%和79.0%的人口在1小时和2小时内可到达经核实的中心。通过地面和直升机运输到达经核实的烧伤中心的可达性存在显著的地区差异。可到达的人口比例最高的是东北地区,最低的是美国南部。

结论

近80%的美国人口通过地面或直升机运输在2小时内可到达经核实的烧伤中心;然而,这些中心的地理可达性在州和地区层面都存在差异。

相似文献

1
Geographic access to burn center hospitals.烧伤中心医院的地理可达性。
JAMA. 2009 Oct 28;302(16):1774-81. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1548.
3
Access to trauma centers in the United States.美国创伤中心的可及性。
JAMA. 2005 Jun 1;293(21):2626-33. doi: 10.1001/jama.293.21.2626.
8
Helicopter transportation of burn patients.烧伤患者的直升机转运。
Burns. 2002 Feb;28(1):70-2. doi: 10.1016/s0305-4179(01)00069-9.

引用本文的文献

3
Access to Burn Care in the US.美国烧伤护理的可及性。
JAMA Surg. 2024 Apr 1;159(4):463-465. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2023.7763.

本文引用的文献

3
A meta-analysis of prehospital care times for trauma.创伤院前护理时间的荟萃分析。
Prehosp Emerg Care. 2006 Apr-Jun;10(2):198-206. doi: 10.1080/10903120500541324.
8
Are we headed for a shortage of burn surgeons?我们是否即将面临烧伤外科医生短缺的问题?
J Burn Care Rehabil. 2004 Nov-Dec;25(6):464-7. doi: 10.1097/01.bcr.0000144534.93523.dc.
9
Regional air transport of burn patients: a case for telemedicine?烧伤患者的区域航空运输:远程医疗是否可行?
J Trauma. 2004 Jul;57(1):57-64; discussion 64. doi: 10.1097/01.ta.0000103992.21727.8f.
10
Early in-hospital management of burn injuries in Australia.澳大利亚烧伤患者的早期院内管理
ANZ J Surg. 2004 May;74(5):318-23. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-1433.2003.02738.x.

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验