National Heart Lung Institute, Imperial College, London, UK.
Thorax. 2011 Jan;66(1):49-54. doi: 10.1136/thx.2010.147041. Epub 2010 Oct 26.
Many studies show a link between forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV(1)) and survival in the general population and this has been interpreted as a link between airway obstruction and survival. However, the observation that vital capacity is also associated with survival weakens this interpretation.
Data on spirometry and survival were taken from the Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities (ARIC) limited access dataset. Survival among 7489 participants with usable spirometry and complete data was regressed against measures of ventilatory function after controlling for many other factors likely to be associated with survival.
Survival was strongly associated with forced vital capacity (FVC) after adjustment for FEV(1), but not the other way round. The fully adjusted hazard ratio (HR) associated with high FVC was 0.90 in men (95% CI 0.80 to 1.00; p=0.049) and 0.82 in women (95% CI 0.70 to 0.95; p=0.01). This compares with 0.98 for FEV(1) in men (95% CI 0.90 to 1.07; p.0.72) and 1.01 in women (95% CI 0.89 to 1.15; p=0.84). There was no association between survival and airway obstruction as measured by the FEV(1)/FVC ratio.
FVC but not airway obstruction predicts survival in asymptomatic adults without chronic respiratory diagnoses or persistent respiratory symptoms. The association is not explained by age, anthropometry, smoking, income occupation or blood pressure. As FVC later in life, cardiovascular risk, type II diabetes mellitus and low-grade systemic inflammation are all associated with poor fetal growth, these other conditions may be partly responsible for the poor survival in those with low FVC.
许多研究表明,1 秒用力呼气量(FEV1)与一般人群的生存率之间存在关联,这被解释为气道阻塞与生存率之间的关联。然而,肺活量也与生存率相关的观察结果削弱了这种解释。
从动脉粥样硬化风险社区(ARIC)有限访问数据集获取肺活量测定和生存数据。在控制许多其他可能与生存相关的因素后,对 7489 名可进行肺活量测定且数据完整的参与者的生存情况与通气功能测量值进行回归分析。
在调整 FEV1 后,生存与用力肺活量(FVC)呈强相关,但反之则不然。男性高 FVC 与高风险比(HR)相关为 0.90(95% CI 0.80 至 1.00;p=0.049),女性为 0.82(95% CI 0.70 至 0.95;p=0.01)。与男性 FEV1 相比,男性 FEV1 为 0.98(95% CI 0.90 至 1.07;p.0.72),女性为 1.01(95% CI 0.89 至 1.15;p=0.84)。FEV1/FVC 比值测量的气道阻塞与生存率之间无关联。
在没有慢性呼吸道疾病或持续性呼吸道症状的无症状成年人中,FVC 而不是气道阻塞预测生存率。这种关联不能用年龄、人体测量、吸烟、收入职业或血压来解释。由于 FVC 与心血管风险、2 型糖尿病和低水平全身炎症相关,而这些因素都与胎儿生长不良有关,因此这些其他条件可能是 FVC 较低的人生存率较差的部分原因。