• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

迁居地:单亲家庭和再婚家庭结构中的儿童癌症治疗决策

Moving to place: childhood cancer treatment decision making in single-parent and repartnered family structures.

机构信息

Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC 20010, USA.

出版信息

Qual Health Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):349-64. doi: 10.1177/1049732310385823. Epub 2010 Oct 27.

DOI:10.1177/1049732310385823
PMID:20980698
Abstract

Few researchers have studied how parents from diverse family structures cope with childhood chronic illness. We designed this study to discern the childhood cancer treatment decision-making (TDM) process in these families. Using grounded theory, we interviewed 15 custodial parents, nonresidential parents, and stepparents who had previously made a major treatment decision for their children with cancer. "Moving to place" was the central psychosocial process by which parents negotiated involvement in TDM. Parents moved toward or were moved away from involvement based on parent position in the family (custodial, nonresidential, and stepparent), prediagnosis family dynamics, and time since diagnosis. Parents used the actions of stepping up, stepping back, being pushed, and stepping away to respond to the need for TDM. Parents faced additional stressors because of their family situations, which affected the TDM process. Findings from this study provide important insight into diverse families and their unique parental TDM experiences.

摘要

很少有研究人员研究过来自不同家庭结构的父母如何应对儿童慢性病。我们设计这项研究是为了了解这些家庭中的儿童癌症治疗决策(TDM)过程。我们采用扎根理论,对 15 名监护父母、非居住父母和继父或继母进行了采访,他们之前曾为患有癌症的孩子做出过重大治疗决定。“搬到地方”是父母协商参与 TDM 的核心心理社会过程。父母是否参与 TDM 取决于他们在家庭中的地位(监护、非居住和继父或继母)、诊断前的家庭动态以及诊断后的时间。父母通过采取主动、退缩、被推动和离开的行动来应对 TDM 的需求。父母因家庭情况而面临额外的压力源,这影响了 TDM 过程。这项研究的结果为不同家庭及其独特的父母 TDM 经验提供了重要的见解。

相似文献

1
Moving to place: childhood cancer treatment decision making in single-parent and repartnered family structures.迁居地:单亲家庭和再婚家庭结构中的儿童癌症治疗决策
Qual Health Res. 2011 Mar;21(3):349-64. doi: 10.1177/1049732310385823. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
2
Family pediatrics: report of the Task Force on the Family.家庭儿科学:家庭问题特别工作组报告
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 2):1541-71.
3
Making the right decision for my child with cancer: the parental imperative.为癌症患儿做出正确决策:父母的使命。
Cancer Nurs. 2012 Nov-Dec;35(6):419-28. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0b013e3182431071.
4
"Shifting family boundaries" after the diagnosis of childhood cancer in stepfamilies.继继家庭中儿童癌症诊断后的家庭边界转变
J Fam Nurs. 2011 Feb;17(1):105-32. doi: 10.1177/1074840710397365.
5
Parents' experiences of a Family Support Program when a parent has incurable cancer.父母在患有绝症时参与家庭支持计划的体验。
J Clin Nurs. 2009 Dec;18(24):3480-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2009.02871.x. Epub 2009 Sep 3.
6
Decision making by parents and healthcare professionals when considering continued care for pediatric patients with cancer.在考虑对患有癌症的儿科患者继续进行护理时,家长和医疗保健专业人员的决策。
Oncol Nurs Forum. 1997 Oct;24(9):1523-8.
7
Parenting experiences during cancer.癌症期间的育儿经历。
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Oct;52(1):38-46. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03562.x.
8
For the love of the children: the coming out process for lesbian and gay parents and stepparents.为了孩子的爱:女同性恋和男同性恋父母及继父母的出柜过程。
J Homosex. 2000;39(1):1-24. doi: 10.1300/J082v39n01_01.
9
Does childhood cancer affect parental divorce rates? A population-based study.儿童癌症是否会影响父母离婚率?一项基于人群的研究。
J Clin Oncol. 2010 Feb 10;28(5):872-7. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2009.24.0556. Epub 2009 Dec 28.
10
Caring for a child with cancer: a longitudinal perspective.关爱患癌儿童:纵向视角
J Adv Nurs. 2005 Apr;50(2):153-61. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2005.03374.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Parents' experiences of being involved in medical decision-making for their child with a life-limiting condition: A systematic review with narrative synthesis.家长参与患有危及生命疾病的儿童医疗决策的体验:系统评价与叙事合成。
Palliat Med. 2024 Jan;38(1):7-24. doi: 10.1177/02692163231214414. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
2
The genogram as a recruitment tool for identifying primary caregivers of youth living with sickle cell disease preparing for transition.作为一种招募工具的系谱图,用于识别为镰状细胞病青少年准备过渡的主要照顾者。
J Adv Nurs. 2023 Jan 30. doi: 10.1111/jan.15570.
3
Cancer-Related Decision-Making Among Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Oncology Providers.
癌症相关决策:青少年、青年、照顾者和肿瘤学提供者的视角。
Qual Health Res. 2021 Nov;31(13):2355-2363. doi: 10.1177/10497323211037654. Epub 2021 Aug 12.
4
Commentary: Writing and Evaluating Qualitative Research Reports.评论:定性研究报告的撰写与评估
J Pediatr Psychol. 2016 Jun;41(5):493-505. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsw032. Epub 2016 Apr 26.
5
Racial and Ethnic Diversity in Grounded Theory Research.扎根理论研究中的种族和民族多样性
Qual Rep. 2014 Apr 28;19(17).
6
Understanding the health impact of caregiving: a qualitative study of immigrant parents and single parents of children with cancer.理解照料对健康的影响:对移民父母和单身父母照顾癌症儿童的定性研究。
Qual Life Res. 2012 Nov;21(9):1595-605. doi: 10.1007/s11136-011-0072-8. Epub 2011 Nov 30.