Holá V, Adensamová J, Mandel M
Výzkumný ústav pro farmacii a biochemii, Praha.
Cesk Farm. 1990 Sep;39(7):302-4.
The antibacterial efficacy of two novel beta-lactam antibiotics of the oxime type, VUFB 16265 and 16272, was evaluated by determining the minimal inhibitory concentration (MIC) in 47 clinical strains and 6 standard strains (Staphylococcus aureus, Streptococcus pyogenes and faecalis, E. coli, Enterobacter and Proteus spec., Pseudomonas aeruginosa), which were the most frequent causes of infectious complications. The results were compared with the MIC of cefalexin, cefoxitin, cefazolin, cefsulodin, and ampicillin. The antibacterial activity of both VUFB drugs was comparable with the efficacy of the antibiotics tested. Only in the strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa the activity of all antibiotics under evaluation was low and only cefsulodin was effective.
通过测定47株临床菌株和6株标准菌株(金黄色葡萄球菌、化脓性链球菌和粪肠球菌、大肠杆菌、肠杆菌属和变形杆菌属、铜绿假单胞菌)的最低抑菌浓度(MIC),评估了两种新型肟型β-内酰胺抗生素VUFB 16265和16272的抗菌效果,这些菌株是感染性并发症最常见的病因。将结果与头孢氨苄、头孢西丁、头孢唑林、头孢磺啶和氨苄西林的MIC进行比较。两种VUFB药物的抗菌活性与所测试抗生素的疗效相当。仅在铜绿假单胞菌菌株中,所有评估抗生素的活性都较低,只有头孢磺啶有效。