Brown J R, Breaud T P, Chew V
USN Disease Vector Ecology and Control Center, Naval Air Station, Jacksonville, FL 32212-0043.
J Am Mosq Control Assoc. 1990 Dec;6(4):713-5.
Three distances (1.2, 3.0 and 7.6 m) and 4 methods (complete diagonal swing, impinger, top diagonal swing and vertical swing) were compared in analyzing the droplet spectra of electrically generated ULV aerosol clouds. There were no significant differences among the 4 methods and no interaction between method and distance. However, when compared over distance, the percent variability indicated the complete diagonal swing provided the most consistent results. Two additional methods (pendulum and settling chamber) were compared with the original 4 methods at 1.2 m only. At this distance, there was no significant difference among the 6 methods.
在分析电生成超低容量(ULV)气溶胶云的液滴谱时,比较了三个距离(1.2米、3.0米和7.6米)和四种方法(完全对角摆动、冲击器、顶部对角摆动和垂直摆动)。这四种方法之间没有显著差异,方法与距离之间也没有相互作用。然而,按距离比较时,变异性百分比表明完全对角摆动提供了最一致的结果。仅在1.2米处将另外两种方法(摆锤法和沉降室法)与原来的四种方法进行了比较。在此距离下,六种方法之间没有显著差异。