Costalat G, Garrigues J M, Alquier Y, Lopez P, Veyrac M, Baldet J, Yousfi A, Vernhet J
Service de Chirurgie Viscérale, Hôpital Lapeyronie, Montpellier.
Ann Chir. 1990;44(10):807-16.
Rectopexy associated with anterior prolepsectomy was performed for 22 patients (19 females, 3 males), with solitary rectal ulcer syndrome (SRUS) surrounding internal rectal prolapse. The different lesions of SRUS were distributed among 3 main groups (G) according to the macroscopic appearance: G1: solitary ulcer (n = 7); G2: ulcerated proctitis (n = 7); G3: muco-hemorroidal prolapse (n = 3). A significant difference (P less than 0.05) was observed between each group, concerning mean age (G1: 34 years, G2 = 49, G3: 65) and the degree of perineal descent, which was more important in G3 and G2. Posterior intersphincteric rectopexy was performed for 6 patients in G3, with descending perineum and faecal incontinence, treated in the same time by perineoplasty (Parks). Abdominal rectopexy, mainly by the antero-posterior technique (Nicholls), was performed for the other patients (n = 6). Large anterior prolapsectomy reaching the top of the mucosal prolapse (4-7 cm), allowing ulcer resection in 3 cases, was combined with rectopexy. Associated operations were: sphincterotomy (n = 8) for narrow fibrous anal canal, sigmoidectomy (n = 4) for dolichocolon. Mean healing time for the solitary ulcer group (G1) was 2 months, 1 month for lesion of G2 and G3. Failures concerned 1 solitary ulcer after abdominal rectopexy and 1 ulcerative proctitis after rectopexy without prolapsectomy. Anorectal pain (81%), rectal bleeding (76%), faecal incontinence (27%), straining (81%), were cured or improved in 80% of cases. These results tend to confirm the efficacy of rectopexy, specially using the antero-posterior technique, for the treatment of SUSR with internal rectal prolapse. Nevertheless, rectopexy seems to be insufficient to correct the mucosal component of internal rectal prolapse, bearing the ulcerated lesion which needs to be treated by associated anterior prolapsectomy. Similarly all functional or organic disorders involving the perineum, anal canal or colon leading to anorectal dysfunction must also be considered to ensure complete treatment.
对22例(19例女性,3例男性)患有围绕直肠内脱垂的孤立性直肠溃疡综合征(SRUS)的患者进行了直肠固定术联合前脱垂切除术。根据宏观外观,SRUS的不同病变分布在3个主要组(G)中:G1:孤立性溃疡(n = 7);G2:溃疡性直肠炎(n = 7);G3:黏液痔脱垂(n = 3)。在平均年龄(G1:34岁,G2 = 49岁,G3:65岁)和会阴下降程度方面,每组之间观察到显著差异(P小于0.05),G3和G2中的会阴下降程度更严重。对G3组中的6例伴有会阴下降和大便失禁的患者进行了后括约肌间直肠固定术,同时采用会阴成形术(Parks法)进行治疗。对其他患者(n = 6)进行了腹部直肠固定术,主要采用前后技术(Nicholls法)。进行了大的前脱垂切除术,切除范围达黏膜脱垂顶部(4 - 7厘米),3例患者同时进行了溃疡切除术,并联合直肠固定术。相关手术包括:对狭窄的纤维性肛管进行括约肌切开术(n = 8),对冗长结肠进行乙状结肠切除术(n = 4)。孤立性溃疡组(G1)的平均愈合时间为2个月,G2和G3组病变的愈合时间为1个月。失败病例包括1例腹部直肠固定术后的孤立性溃疡和1例未进行脱垂切除术的直肠固定术后的溃疡性直肠炎。80%的病例中,肛门直肠疼痛(81%)、直肠出血(76%)、大便失禁(27%)、排便费力(81%)得到治愈或改善。这些结果倾向于证实直肠固定术,特别是采用前后技术,对治疗伴有直肠内脱垂的SUSR的有效性。然而,直肠固定术似乎不足以纠正直肠内脱垂的黏膜成分,伴有溃疡病变需要通过联合前脱垂切除术进行治疗。同样,所有涉及会阴、肛管或结肠导致肛门直肠功能障碍的功能性或器质性疾病也必须予以考虑,以确保彻底治疗。