Blondell J M
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Washington, DC 20460.
Med Lav. 1990 Nov-Dec;81(6):524-9.
Epidemiologic studies of cancer in pesticide users suffer from three main difficulties: lack of appropriate controls, exposure ascertainment, and exposure to multiple pesticides. Principles of control selection are discussed in the context of cohort and case-control studies. Residence on a farm is associated with unique dietary and lifestyle factors which are important to account for in case-control studies of pesticides users on farms. Exposure ascertainment methods include information collected from job descriptions, interviews, pesticide suppliers, expert panels, application records, passive dosimetry, and biological monitoring. Sensitive methods based on cell receptor-pesticide complexes have been proposed, but have not yet been validated and field tested as methods of quantitative exposure assessment. Examination of studies which successfully helped demonstrate cancer causation is suggested as a means of determining which epidemiologic methods are most fruitful and efficient at identifying human carcinogens.
缺乏合适的对照、暴露确定以及接触多种农药。在队列研究和病例对照研究的背景下讨论了对照选择的原则。居住在农场与独特的饮食和生活方式因素相关,这在对农场农药使用者的病例对照研究中需要加以考虑。暴露确定方法包括从工作描述、访谈、农药供应商、专家小组、施用记录、被动剂量测定和生物监测中收集的信息。基于细胞受体 - 农药复合物的灵敏方法已被提出,但尚未作为定量暴露评估方法进行验证和现场测试。建议对成功有助于证明癌症因果关系的研究进行审查,以此作为确定哪些流行病学方法在识别人类致癌物方面最有成效和效率的一种手段。