Division of Healthcare Quality Promotion, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Georgia 30333, USA.
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2010 Dec;31(12):1257-63. doi: 10.1086/657584. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
In 2007-2008, several US hospitals reported summertime increases in the number of clinical blood cultures positive for Bacillus species, which are common environmental bacteria.
To investigate increased rates of isolation of Bacillus species from blood cultures, identify risk factors, and recommend control strategies.
Survey and case-control study.
Multiple hospitals, including a cancer center.
We surveyed 24 facilities that reported increases. We also conducted a field investigation at a hospital with a high rate, reviewing charts, collecting clinical and environmental isolates, and observing infection control procedures. A case-control study compared inpatient case patients who had any blood culture positive for Bacillus with unmatched control patients who had a blood culture with no growth during June-August 2008.
Among surveyed facilities, mean monthly rates rose from 25 to a peak of 75 Bacillus-positive blood cultures per 10,000 blood cultures performed during the period June-August. At the hospital where the case-control investigation was conducted, for most case patients (75%), the Bacillus-positive blood cultures represented contamination or device colonization rather than infection. We enrolled 48 case patients and 48 control patients; in multivariate analysis, only central venous access device use was significantly associated with case status (odds ratio, 14.0; [Formula: see text]). Laboratory testing identified at least 12 different Bacillus species (non-anthracis) among the isolates. Observation of infection control procedures revealed variability in central line care and blood sample collection techniques.
Periodic increases in the environmental load of Bacillus species may occur in hospitals. Our investigation indicated that at one facility, these increases likely represented a pseudo-outbreak of Bacillus species colonizing central venous lines or their accessories, such as needleless connector devices. Vigilant attention should be paid to infection control practices when collecting blood samples for culture, to minimize the risk of contamination by environmental microorganisms.
2007-2008 年,几家美国医院报告夏季临床血液培养阳性的芽孢杆菌数量增加,芽孢杆菌是常见的环境细菌。
调查血液培养中芽孢杆菌分离率增加的原因,确定危险因素,并提出控制策略。
调查和病例对照研究。
包括癌症中心在内的多家医院。
我们调查了报告增加的 24 家医院。我们还在一家芽孢杆菌阳性血培养率较高的医院进行了现场调查,查阅病历,收集临床和环境分离物,并观察感染控制程序。病例对照研究比较了 2008 年 6 月至 8 月间任何芽孢杆菌阳性血培养的住院患者病例与无生长的匹配对照患者。
在接受调查的医院中,平均每月发病率从 25 例增加到 6 月至 8 月期间 10000 份血培养中 75 例芽孢杆菌阳性血培养的峰值。在进行病例对照调查的医院中,对于大多数病例患者(75%),芽孢杆菌阳性血培养代表污染或装置定植而非感染。我们纳入了 48 例病例患者和 48 例对照患者;多变量分析显示,只有中心静脉置管使用与病例状态显著相关(比值比,14.0;[公式:见正文])。实验室检测鉴定出分离物中有至少 12 种不同的芽孢杆菌(非炭疽)。对感染控制程序的观察发现,中心静脉置管护理和血液样本采集技术存在差异。
芽孢杆菌环境负荷可能会在医院中定期增加。我们的调查表明,在一家医院,这些增加可能代表了芽孢杆菌定植于中心静脉导管或其附件(如无针连接器装置)的假爆发。在采集用于培养的血液样本时,应密切注意感染控制实践,以最大程度减少环境微生物污染的风险。