Whinnett Zachary I, Nott Gemma, Davies Justin E R, Willson Keith, Manisty Charlotte H, Kanagaratnam Prapa, Peters Nicholas S, Davies D Wyn, Hughes Alun D, Mayet Jamil, Francis Darrel P
International Centre for Circulatory Health, National Heart and Lung Institute, St Mary's Hospital and Imperial College, London, United Kingdom.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;34(2):217-25. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2010.02933.x. Epub 2010 Oct 4.
During optimization of the atrioventricular (AV) delay of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT), it is not known exactly which windows of time around the transition are most informative for identification of the optimum.
IN 22 patients with CRT, we performed AV delay optimization using continuous noninvasive hemodynamics. We used signal-to-noise ratio to determine the most efficient averaging window location and width. We found that it is most efficient to position the averaging windows immediately before and immediately after the transition in AV delay. For example, skipping five beats after the transition decreases signal-to-noise ratio by 17.5% (P < 0.0001). Similarly, skipping five beats immediately before the transition reduces signal-to-noise ratio by 11.7% (P < 0.0001). The best choice of "fixed" averaging window width was found to be six beats, with signal-to-noise ratio falling by, for example, 41% for a one-beat window (P = 0.0002). However, even better was to set the window width for each patient to match one respiratory cycle. We observed that the pre- and posttransition signal-to-noise ratio traces begin to diverge three beats after the transition in AV delay. We believe this represents the time taken for the peripheral response to pacing-induced changes in stroke volume to occur.
THE most efficient way to use alternating transitions for the hemodynamic optimization of CRT is to use an averaging window of one respiratory cycle, and not to skip any beats between the pretransition and posttransition averaging windows.
在心脏再同步治疗(CRT)的房室(AV)延迟优化过程中,对于在转变前后的哪些时间窗对于确定最佳延迟最为关键,目前尚不清楚。
在22例接受CRT治疗的患者中,我们采用连续无创血流动力学方法进行AV延迟优化。我们使用信噪比来确定最有效的平均窗位置和宽度。我们发现,将平均窗置于AV延迟转变之前和之后紧邻的位置最为有效。例如,在转变后跳过5个心搏会使信噪比降低17.5%(P < 0.0001)。同样,在转变前立即跳过5个心搏会使信噪比降低11.7%(P < 0.0001)。发现“固定”平均窗宽度的最佳选择是6个心搏,例如,对于1个心搏的窗,信噪比会下降41%(P = 0.0002)。然而,更好的做法是为每位患者设置窗宽度以匹配一个呼吸周期。我们观察到,在AV延迟转变后3个心搏,转变前后的信噪比曲线开始出现差异。我们认为这代表了外周对起搏诱导的每搏量变化做出反应所需的时间。
利用交替转变进行CRT血流动力学优化的最有效方法是使用一个呼吸周期的平均窗,并且在转变前和转变后的平均窗之间不要跳过任何心搏。