Khan Fakhar Z, Virdee Munmohan S, Hutchinson John, Smith Beverley, Pugh Peter J, Read Philip A, Fynn Simon P, Dutka David P
Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Addenbrooke’s Hospital, Cambridge, UK.
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2011 Nov;34(11):1527-36. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8159.2011.03172.x.
Noninvasive cardiac output (CO) measurement (NICOM) is a novel method to assess ventricular function and offers a potential alternative for optimization of cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) devices. We compared the effect of NICOM-based optimization to no optimization (empiric settings) on CRT outcomes.
Two hundred and three patients undergoing CRT were assessed in two consecutive nonrandomized groups; an empiric group (n = 54) was programmed to "out of the box" settings with a fixed AV delay of 120 ms and a VV delay of 0 ms; and the optimization group (n = 149) underwent adjustments of both the AV and VV delays according to the greatest improvement in resting CO. The primary endpoints were improvements in left ventricular (LV) volumes and function from baseline at 6 months. Secondary endpoints were change in New York Heart Association (NYHA) class, quality of life score, and 6-minute walk test (6 MWT) performance.
After 6 months of CRT, the optimization group had a better clinical response with lower NYHA class (2.1 ± 0.8 vs 2.4 ± 0.8, P = 0.048) and quality of life scores (35 ± 18 vs 42 ± 20, P = 0.045) but no differences in 6-MWT performance (269 ± 110 vs 277 ± 114 m, P = 0.81). Echocardiographic response was also better in the optimization group with lower LV end systolic volume (108 ± 51 vs 126 ± 60 mL, P = 0.048) and higher ejection fraction (30 ± 7 vs 27 ± 8, P = 0.01) compared to empiric settings.
Device optimization using noninvasive measures of CO is associated with better clinical and echocardiographic response compared to empiric settings.
无创心输出量(CO)测量(NICOM)是一种评估心室功能的新方法,为优化心脏再同步治疗(CRT)设备提供了一种潜在的替代方法。我们比较了基于NICOM的优化与未优化(经验设置)对CRT结果的影响。
连续对两组非随机分组的203例接受CRT的患者进行评估;经验组(n = 54)采用固定房室延迟120 ms和室间延迟0 ms的“开箱即用”设置进行编程;优化组(n = 149)根据静息CO的最大改善情况对房室和室间延迟进行调整。主要终点是6个月时左心室(LV)容积和功能相对于基线的改善情况。次要终点是纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级、生活质量评分和6分钟步行试验(6 MWT)表现的变化。
CRT治疗6个月后,优化组有更好的临床反应,NYHA分级更低(2.1±0.8对2.4±0.8,P = 0.048),生活质量评分更高(35±18对42±20,P = 0.045),但6 MWT表现无差异(269±110对277±114 m,P = 0.81)。与经验设置相比,优化组的超声心动图反应也更好,左心室收缩末期容积更低(108±51对126±60 mL,P = 0.048),射血分数更高(30±7对 27±8,P = 0.01)。
与经验设置相比,使用无创CO测量进行设备优化与更好的临床和超声心动图反应相关。