NIVEL, Netherlands Institute for Health Services Research, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
J Intellect Disabil Res. 2011 Jan;55(1):4-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2788.2010.01342.x. Epub 2010 Oct 28.
Community participation has been defined as performing daytime activities by people while interacting with others. Previous studies on community participation among people with intellectual disability (ID) have mainly focused on the domestic life aspect. This study investigates the variation in community participation in the domains work, social contacts and leisure activities among people with ID in the Netherlands. A number of categories of people with ID were distinguished by: (1) gender; (2) age; (3) type of education; (4) severity of ID; and (5) accommodation type.
Data were gathered on 653 people with mild or moderate ID, of whom 513 by oral interviews and 140 by structured questionnaires filled in by representatives of those who could not be interviewed. Pearson chi-square tests were used to test differences between categories of people with ID in the distributions of the participation variables. Additional logistic regression analyses were conducted to correct for differences between the categories in other variables.
Most people with mild or moderate ID in the Netherlands have work or other daytime activities, have social contacts and have leisure activities. However, people aged 50 years and over and people with moderate ID participate less in these domains than those under 50 years and people with mild ID. Moreover, people with ID hardly participate in activities with people without ID.
High participation among people with a mild or moderate ID within the domains of work, social contact and leisure activities does not necessarily indicate a high level of interaction with the community, because the majority hardly interact with people without ID. Furthermore, older people with ID and people with a more severe level of ID seem to be more at risk for social exclusion.
社区参与被定义为人们在与他人互动时进行日间活动。先前关于智障人士(ID)社区参与的研究主要集中在国内生活方面。本研究调查了荷兰 ID 人士在工作、社会联系和休闲活动领域的社区参与度的变化。通过以下几个方面区分了不同类别的 ID 人士:(1)性别;(2)年龄;(3)教育类型;(4)智力障碍程度;(5)住宿类型。
本研究共收集了 653 名轻度或中度 ID 人士的数据,其中 513 人通过口头访谈收集,140 人通过无法接受访谈的代表填写的结构化问卷收集。采用 Pearson 卡方检验比较不同 ID 类别在参与变量分布上的差异。此外,还进行了逻辑回归分析以校正其他变量之间的差异。
荷兰大多数轻度或中度 ID 人士都有工作或其他日间活动,有社会联系并有休闲活动。然而,50 岁及以上的人和中度 ID 人士比 50 岁以下的人和轻度 ID 人士在这些领域的参与度较低。此外,ID 人士很少与非 ID 人士一起参加活动。
轻度或中度 ID 人士在工作、社会联系和休闲活动领域的高参与度并不一定表明他们与社区的互动程度高,因为大多数 ID 人士几乎不与非 ID 人士互动。此外,年龄较大的 ID 人士和智力障碍程度较严重的 ID 人士似乎面临更大的社会排斥风险。