Xie Yi-bin, Wang Zheng, Han Zhi-kai, Li Ai-dong, Zhang Zi-qiang, Li Huai, Ma Jie, Zhao Ping
Department of Abdominal Surgical Oncology, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences, Beijing 100021, China.
Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2010 Aug 10;90(30):2126-9.
To investigate the anti-tumor effect of interventional chemotherapy with liposome doxorubicin for hepatic metastasis of pancreatic tumor in nude mice.
After the establishment of hepatic metastatic model of pancreatic tumor, the nude mice received various formulations via a spleen injection to imitate the interventional chemotherapy. In each of two following experiments, 42 nude mice were randomly divided into 6 groups. They received liposomal doxorubicin (including high, intermittent and low-dose), free doxorubicin, gemcitabine plus cisplatin and control respectively. In the first experiment, the doses were 6, 3, 1.5, 3, 3 mg/kg and 100 µl 10% glucose for each group respectively. And in the second experiment, 9, 6, 3, 6, 6 mg/kg, and 100 µl 10% glucose respectively. The efficacies of interventional injection of liposomal doxorubicin with different doses were examined in terms of tumor growth retardation for the hepatic metastatic foci of pancreatic tumor.
In the first experiment, the difference of median hepatic tumor volume was significant among the three groups of mice receiving liposomal doxorubicin with incremental doses in a dose-dependent manner [high dose: (3 ± 1) mm(3), middle dose: (55 ± 18) mm(3), low dose: (90 ± 23) mm(3), P < 0.05]. The liposomal doxorubicin led to a substantial delay of tumor growth as compared to the free drug or gemcitabine plus cisplatin at the same dose (both P < 0.05). In addition, all animals were well-tolerated with no obvious acute toxicity. In the second experiment, significant difference was obtained for the mice injected with different doses of liposomal doxorubicin [(11 ± 4) mm(3), (13 ± 4) mm(3), (50 ± 18) mm(3), P < 0.05]. It was correlated with tumor growth delay. The mice administered with either 9 mg/kg or 6 mg/kg were more efficacious to retard tumor growth than those given 3 mg/kg (P < 0.05). Despite its enhanced effectiveness as compared to mice in gemcitabine plus cisplatin group (P < 0.05), the liposomal doxorubicin at a dose of 6 mg/kg resulted in a marginally delayed tumor growth compared to those of free doxorubicin at the same dose (P > 0.05). No evident acute toxic response was observed for each group of mice receiving liposomal doxorubicin. In contrast, approximately half of the animals receiving either free doxorubicin or gemcitabine plus cisplatin died of toxic responses.
Liposomal doxorubicin may be a potential interventional chemotherapeutic agent for hepatic metastasis of pancreatic tumor because of improved anti-tumor efficacy and reduced toxicity in comparison to free doxorubicin and gemcitabine plus cisplatin.
探讨脂质体阿霉素介入化疗对裸鼠胰腺肿瘤肝转移的抗肿瘤作用。
建立胰腺肿瘤肝转移模型后,通过脾内注射给予裸鼠不同制剂以模拟介入化疗。在接下来的两个实验中,将42只裸鼠随机分为6组。分别给予脂质体阿霉素(包括高、中、低剂量)、游离阿霉素、吉西他滨加顺铂以及对照组。在第一个实验中,每组剂量分别为6、3、1.5、3、3mg/kg和100μl 10%葡萄糖。在第二个实验中,分别为9、6、3、6、6mg/kg和100μl 10%葡萄糖。从胰腺肿瘤肝转移灶的肿瘤生长延缓情况来检测不同剂量脂质体阿霉素介入注射的疗效。
在第一个实验中,接受递增剂量脂质体阿霉素的三组小鼠的肝肿瘤体积中位数差异显著,呈剂量依赖性[高剂量:(3±1)mm³,中剂量:(55±18)mm³,低剂量:(90±23)mm³,P<0.05]。与相同剂量的游离药物或吉西他滨加顺铂相比,脂质体阿霉素导致肿瘤生长显著延迟(均P<0.05)。此外,所有动物耐受性良好,无明显急性毒性。在第二个实验中,注射不同剂量脂质体阿霉素的小鼠有显著差异[(11±4)mm³,(13±4)mm³,(50±18)mm³,P<0.05]。这与肿瘤生长延迟相关。给予9mg/kg或6mg/kg的小鼠比给予3mg/kg的小鼠在延缓肿瘤生长方面更有效(P<0.05)。尽管与吉西他滨加顺铂组的小鼠相比其有效性增强(P<0.05),但6mg/kg剂量的脂质体阿霉素与相同剂量的游离阿霉素相比,肿瘤生长延迟程度略低(P>0.05)。接受脂质体阿霉素的每组小鼠均未观察到明显的急性毒性反应。相比之下,接受游离阿霉素或吉西他滨加顺铂的动物中约有一半死于毒性反应。
与游离阿霉素和吉西他滨加顺铂相比,脂质体阿霉素可能是胰腺肿瘤肝转移的一种潜在介入化疗药物,因其具有更高的抗肿瘤疗效和更低的毒性。