Suppr超能文献

区域内动脉化疗与全身化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的系统评价和荟萃分析。

Regional intra-arterial vs. systemic chemotherapy for advanced pancreatic cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

机构信息

Department of Pancreatic Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China.

出版信息

PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e40847. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0040847. Epub 2012 Jul 18.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the efficacy and safety of regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC) versus systemic chemotherapy for stage III/IV pancreatic cancer.

METHODS

Randomized controlled trials of patients with advanced pancreatic cancer treated by regional intra-arterial or systemic chemotherapy were identified using PubMed, ISI, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, Google, Chinese Scientific Journals Database (VIP), and China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI) electronic databases, for all publications dated between 1960 and December 31, 2010. Data was independently extracted by two reviewers. Odds ratios and relative risks were pooled using either fixed- or random-effects models, depending on I(2) statistic and Q test assessments of heterogeneity. Statistical analysis was performed using RevMan 5.0.

RESULTS

Six randomized controlled trials comprised of 298 patients met the standards for inclusion in the meta-analysis, among 492 articles that were identified. Eight patients achieved complete remission (CR) with regional intra-arterial chemotherapy (RIAC), whereas no patients achieved CR with systemic chemotherapy. Compared with systemic chemotherapy, patients receiving RIAC had superior partial remissions (RR = 1.99, 95% CI: 1.50, 2.65; 58.06% with RIAC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), clinical benefits (RR = 2.34, 95% CI: 1.84, 2.97; 78.06% with RAIC and 29.37% with systemic treatment), total complication rates (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.60, 0.87; 49.03% with RIAC and 71.33% with systemic treatment), and hematological side effects (RR = 0.76, 95% CI: 0.63, 0.91; 60.87% with RIAC and 85.71% with systemic treatment). The median survival time with RIAC (5-21 months) was longer than for systemic chemotherapy (2.7-14 months). Similarly, one year survival rates with RIAC (28.6%-41.2%) were higher than with systemic chemotherapy (0%-12.9%.).

CONCLUSION

Regional intra-arterial chemotherapy is more effective and has fewer complications than systemic chemotherapy for treating advanced pancreatic cancer.

摘要

目的

研究区域动脉内化疗(RIAC)与全身化疗治疗 III/IV 期胰腺癌的疗效和安全性。

方法

通过 PubMed、ISI、EMBASE、Cochrane 图书馆、Google、中国科学期刊数据库(VIP)和中国国家知识基础设施(CNKI)电子数据库,检索 1960 年 1 月至 2010 年 12 月 31 日期间发表的所有关于接受区域内动脉或全身化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌的患者的随机对照试验。由两名评审员独立提取数据。采用固定或随机效应模型对比值比和相对风险进行合并,具体取决于 I²统计量和 Q 检验评估的异质性。使用 RevMan 5.0 进行统计分析。

结果

在 492 篇文章中,有 6 项随机对照试验符合纳入荟萃分析的标准,共纳入 298 例患者。8 例患者接受区域动脉内化疗(RIAC)治疗后完全缓解(CR),而全身化疗组无患者达到 CR。与全身化疗相比,接受 RIAC 治疗的患者有更好的部分缓解(RR=1.99,95%CI:1.50,2.65;58.06%接受 RIAC 治疗,29.37%接受全身治疗)、临床获益(RR=2.34,95%CI:1.84,2.97;78.06%接受 RIAC 治疗,29.37%接受全身治疗)、总并发症发生率(RR=0.72,95%CI:0.60,0.87;49.03%接受 RIAC 治疗,71.33%接受全身治疗)和血液学副作用(RR=0.76,95%CI:0.63,0.91;60.87%接受 RIAC 治疗,85.71%接受全身治疗)。RIAC 组的中位生存时间(5-21 个月)长于全身化疗组(2.7-14 个月)。同样,RIAC 组的 1 年生存率(28.6%-41.2%)高于全身化疗组(0%-12.9%)。

结论

与全身化疗相比,区域动脉内化疗治疗晚期胰腺癌更有效,且并发症更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/518e/3399885/069e9709d131/pone.0040847.g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验