Suppr超能文献

威权主义与回应性社群主义生命伦理学。

Authoritarian versus responsive communitarian bioethics.

机构信息

The Institute for Communitarian Policy Studies, The George Washington University, 1922 F St NW, Suite 413, Washington, DC 20037, USA.

出版信息

J Med Ethics. 2011 Jan;37(1):17-23. doi: 10.1136/jme.2010.037846. Epub 2010 Oct 28.

Abstract

A communitarian approach to bioethics adds a core value to a field that is often more concerned with considerations of individual autonomy. Some interpretations of liberalism put the needs of the patient over those of the community; authoritarian communitarianism privileges the needs of society over those of the patient. Responsive communitarianism's main starting point is that we face two conflicting core values, autonomy and the common good, and that neither should be a priori privileged and that we have principles and procedure that can be used to work out this conflict but not to eliminate it. Additionally, it favours changing behaviour mainly through the creation of norms and by drawing on informal social control rather than by coercion.

摘要

社群主义的生命伦理学方法为一个往往更关注个人自主性考虑的领域增加了一个核心价值。一些对自由主义的解释将患者的需求置于社区之上;权威社群主义则将社会的需求置于患者之上。回应性社群主义的主要出发点是,我们面临着两种相互冲突的核心价值观,即自主性和共同利益,两者都不应优先考虑,我们有原则和程序可以用来解决这种冲突,但不能消除它。此外,它倾向于主要通过创建规范和利用非正式的社会控制来改变行为,而不是通过强制。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验