• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

从人工制品到效应:人工制品对团队的组织效应。

From artefact to effect: the organising effects of artefacts on teams.

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioural Studies, University West, Trollhättan, Sweden.

出版信息

J Health Organ Manag. 2010;24(4):412-27. doi: 10.1108/14777261011065011.

DOI:10.1108/14777261011065011
PMID:21033637
Abstract

PURPOSE

Earlier studies have identified artefacts, but have only to a lesser degree looked at their effects. The purpose of this paper is to investigate how artefacts contribute to organisation.

DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: A trauma team at a university hospital has been observed and its members interviewed.

FINDINGS

The trauma team showed itself to be rich on artefacts since it had strong internal driving forces, high legitimacy, and tried to live up to high expectations from the outside. Its members were motivated to be in the forefront of trauma care. Through renewal, the team succeeded in maintaining demarcation. It also succeeded in systemising internal work tasks and made for itself a position in relation to the outside. The team's capacity, however, came to be limited by internal conflicts and battles for prestige.

PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS

The study shows that informal logic has a strong influence on teams. Teamwork contributed to the development of organisational structure and motivation for the personnel.

ORIGINALITY/VALUE: Earlier studies advocate the important role of artefacts in order to communicate, collaborate, negotiate or coordinate activities. The conclusion is that artefacts also have an organising and developing effect on teams in a fragmented and differentiated healthcare.

摘要

目的

早期研究已经确定了人工制品,但只是在较小程度上研究了它们的影响。本文旨在探讨人工制品如何促进组织的发展。

设计/方法/途径:观察了一所大学医院的创伤小组,并对其成员进行了访谈。

结果

由于具有强大的内部驱动力、高度的合法性,并试图满足外界的高期望,创伤小组表现出丰富的人工制品。其成员有动力成为创伤护理的前沿。通过更新,该团队成功地保持了分工。它还成功地将内部工作任务系统化,并为自己在外部建立了一个位置。然而,团队的能力受到内部冲突和争夺声誉的限制。

实际影响

该研究表明,非正式逻辑对团队有很强的影响。团队合作促进了组织结构的发展和人员的积极性。

原创性/价值:早期的研究主张人工制品在沟通、协作、谈判或协调活动方面的重要作用。结论是,在碎片化和差异化的医疗保健环境中,人工制品对团队也具有组织和发展的作用。

相似文献

1
From artefact to effect: the organising effects of artefacts on teams.从人工制品到效应:人工制品对团队的组织效应。
J Health Organ Manag. 2010;24(4):412-27. doi: 10.1108/14777261011065011.
2
Cultural camouflage--a critical study of how artefacts are camouflaged and mental health policy subverted.文化伪装——对人工制品如何被伪装以及心理健康政策如何被颠覆的批判性研究。
Int J Health Plann Manage. 2015 Apr-Jun;30(2):111-26. doi: 10.1002/hpm.2210. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
3
The culture of a trauma team in relation to human factors.创伤团队与人为因素相关的文化。
J Clin Nurs. 2006 Oct;15(10):1257-66. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2702.2006.01566.x.
4
Illusions of team working in health care.医疗保健中的团队合作幻象。
J Health Organ Manag. 2013;27(1):134-42. doi: 10.1108/14777261311311843.
5
A typology for health care teams.医疗团队的分类法。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2010 Oct-Dec;35(4):345-54. doi: 10.1097/HMR.0b013e3181e9fceb.
6
How hospitalists work to pull healthcare teams together.住院医师如何努力凝聚医疗团队。
J Health Organ Manag. 2015;29(7):933-47. doi: 10.1108/JHOM-01-2015-0008.
7
Innovative health care delivery teams: learning to be a team player is as important as learning other specialised skills.创新型医疗服务团队:学会成为团队一员与学习其他专业技能同样重要。
J Health Organ Manag. 2008;22(2):129-46. doi: 10.1108/14777260810876303.
8
Assessing the performance of surgical teams.评估手术团队的表现。
Health Care Manage Rev. 2009 Jan-Mar;34(1):29-41. doi: 10.1097/01.HMR.0000342977.84307.64.
9
Boundary work and the introduction of acute care nurse practitioners in healthcare teams.边界工作与急症护理执业护士在医疗团队中的引入。
J Adv Nurs. 2012 Jul;68(7):1504-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2011.05895.x. Epub 2011 Nov 27.
10
Synchronous work: myth or reality? A critical study of teams in health and medical care.同步工作:是神话还是现实?卫生和医疗保健团队的批判性研究。
J Eval Clin Pract. 2010 Dec;16(6):1314-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2753.2009.01334.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.

引用本文的文献

1
Perinatal staff perceptions of safety and quality in their service.围产期工作人员对其服务中安全与质量的认知。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Nov 28;14:591. doi: 10.1186/s12913-014-0591-4.
2
Everyday practices at the medical ward: a 16-month ethnographic field study.医疗病房的日常实践:一项为期 16 个月的民族志实地研究。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jul 2;12:184. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-12-184.