• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

关于改善发展中社区环境决策的五个建议:决策科学的见解。

Five propositions for improving decision making about the environment in developing communities: insights from the decision sciences.

机构信息

Department of Community, Agriculture, Recreation, and Resource Studies, Michigan State University, 305 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI 48824, USA.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2011 Mar;92(3):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.010
PMID:21035941
Abstract

Decisions focused on managing natural resources in developing areas present some of the most imposing challenges to policy makers, scientists, and stakeholders alike. The response of policy makers and the technical community in the face of these challenges has been significant. However, our experiences as researchers and facilitators of group planning and decision-making processes have left us concerned about the lack of attention devoted to supporting the underlying processes used to make these complex decisions. To this end, we present five propositions based on work in the decision sciences that we believe stand out as essential for improving decision-making processes in developing communities.

摘要

发展中地区的自然资源管理决策对决策者、科学家和利益相关者来说都是最具挑战性的问题之一。政策制定者和技术界对这些挑战的反应是重大的。然而,作为群体规划和决策过程的研究人员和促进者,我们感到关切的是,没有足够重视支持用于做出这些复杂决策的基本过程。为此,我们根据决策科学的工作提出了五个命题,我们认为这些命题对改善发展中社区的决策过程至关重要。

相似文献

1
Five propositions for improving decision making about the environment in developing communities: insights from the decision sciences.关于改善发展中社区环境决策的五个建议:决策科学的见解。
J Environ Manage. 2011 Mar;92(3):363-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.10.010. Epub 2010 Oct 29.
2
Using social network analysis to examine the decision-making process on new vaccine introduction in Nigeria.利用社交网络分析研究尼日利亚新疫苗引入决策过程。
Health Policy Plan. 2012 May;27 Suppl 2:ii27-38. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czs037.
3
On the design of computer-based models for integrated environmental science.论基于计算机的综合环境科学模型设计
Environ Manage. 2005 Jun;35(6):741-52. doi: 10.1007/s00267-004-0172-0.
4
Decision making in high-velocity environments: implications for healthcare.高速环境中的决策制定:对医疗保健的影响。
J Healthc Manag. 1999 May-Jun;44(3):197-204; discussion 204-5.
5
Guiding policy decisions for genetic screening: developing a systematic and transparent approach.指导基因筛查的政策决策:制定一种系统且透明的方法。
Public Health Genomics. 2011;14(1):9-16. doi: 10.1159/000272898. Epub 2009 Dec 29.
6
Integrating decision tools for the sustainable management of land contamination.整合用于土地污染可持续管理的决策工具。
Sci Total Environ. 2004 Jun 5;325(1-3):15-28. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2003.11.017.
7
How do drug policy makers access research evidence?药物政策制定者如何获取研究证据?
Int J Drug Policy. 2009 Jan;20(1):70-5. doi: 10.1016/j.drugpo.2007.11.017. Epub 2008 Jan 15.
8
Linking stakeholders and decision makers with science in managing the coastal water environment: case studies from urban, industrial and rural subtropical catchments in Australia.在管理沿海水环境中将利益相关者和决策者与科学联系起来:来自澳大利亚城市、工业和农村亚热带集水区的案例研究。
Water Sci Technol. 2003;47(6):179-84.
9
Factors of the innovation, organization, environment, and individual that predict the influence five systematic reviews had on public health decisions.创新、组织、环境和个体等因素,这些因素预测了五项系统评价对公共卫生决策的影响。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2001 Fall;17(4):467-78.
10
Evaluating health impact assessment.评估健康影响评估。
Public Health. 2004 Dec;118(8):544-52. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2003.10.012.

引用本文的文献

1
Decision frameworks for restoration & adaptation investment-Applying lessons from asset-intensive industries to the Great Barrier Reef.恢复和适应投资的决策框架——从资本密集型产业中吸取教训应用到大堡礁。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 3;15(11):e0240460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0240460. eCollection 2020.
2
Identity-driven differences in stakeholder concerns about hunting wolves.利益相关者对猎杀狼的担忧中基于身份认同的差异。
PLoS One. 2014 Dec 2;9(12):e114460. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114460. eCollection 2014.