• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

同行会诊能否提高全科医疗的护理质量?

Do peer consultations improve quality of care in general practice?

作者信息

Kuyvenhoven M M, Pieters H M, Jacobs H M, Touw-Otten F W, Spreeuwenberg C

机构信息

Department of General Practice, University of Utrecht, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2(2):171-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/2.2.171.

DOI:10.1093/intqhc/2.2.171
PMID:2103882
Abstract

The present study relates to three aspects of quality of care in general practice: attention paid to somatic aspects, patient orientation and risk of unnecessary harm. Quality of care had been measured by (a) a written simulation of patient-doctor encounters, which includes five patients and (b) rating procedures. The study has been carried out in two steps. Firstly several aspects of peer consultation have been investigated in a group of 184 doctors (response rate: 83%), who had their vocational training in the department of General Practice of the University of Utrecht. One third of the GPs consulted colleagues frequently and continued to do so for long periods, dealing systematically with a variety of problems, one third did so infrequently or unsystematically, and one third did little or no consulting at all. A relationship was found between the type of practice and consulting behaviour: 20% of those who practice alone never consulted peers, whereas those in group practices and health centres are accustomed to do so regularly. Secondly, 49 doctors were selected from the 184 mentioned above. The 49 did not differ from the remainder in several relevant aspects such as practice setting, subscription to medical journals, etc. Peer consultation seems to have a direct relationship with the quality of attention paid to somatic aspects; GPs who do not consult among peers in any way display a lower quality of attention to somatic aspects in comparison to the others. In this study these GPs are all solo physicians.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

摘要

本研究涉及全科医疗服务质量的三个方面

对躯体问题的关注、以患者为导向以及不必要伤害的风险。医疗服务质量通过以下方式衡量:(a)医患交流的书面模拟,其中包括五名患者;(b)评分程序。该研究分两步进行。首先,在184名医生(回复率:83%)中调查了同行咨询的几个方面,这些医生在乌得勒支大学全科医疗系接受过职业培训。三分之一的全科医生经常咨询同事,且长期如此,系统地处理各种问题;三分之一的医生咨询较少或不系统;三分之一的医生几乎不咨询或根本不咨询。研究发现执业类型与咨询行为之间存在关联:独自执业的医生中有20%从不咨询同行,而在团体执业和健康中心工作的医生则习惯于定期咨询。其次,从上述184名医生中挑选出49名。这49名医生在执业环境、订阅医学期刊等几个相关方面与其余医生没有差异。同行咨询似乎与对躯体问题的关注质量直接相关;与其他医生相比,从不与同行咨询的全科医生对躯体问题的关注质量较低。在本研究中,这些全科医生均为独自执业医生。(摘要截断于250字)

相似文献

1
Do peer consultations improve quality of care in general practice?同行会诊能否提高全科医疗的护理质量?
Qual Assur Health Care. 1990;2(2):171-9. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/2.2.171.
2
The association between peer consultations and three aspects of clinical competence.同伴咨询与临床能力三个方面之间的关联。
Fam Pract. 1990 Sep;7(3):163-7. doi: 10.1093/fampra/7.3.163.
3
Consultation among peers in general practice; from no consultation to peer review.
Scand J Prim Health Care. 1988 Feb;6(1):5-12. doi: 10.3109/02813438809009284.
4
How do we compare with our colleagues? Quality of general practitioner performance in consultations for non-acute abdominal complaints.我们与同行相比情况如何?非急性腹部疾病会诊中全科医生的诊疗质量。
Int J Qual Health Care. 1999 Dec;11(6):475-86. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/11.6.475.
5
Joint consultation of general practitioner and rheumatologist: does it matter?全科医生和风湿病学家的联合会诊:这重要吗?
Ann Rheum Dis. 2003 Feb;62(2):159-61. doi: 10.1136/ard.62.2.159.
6
Referrals to physiotherapy: the relation between the number of referrals, the indication for referral and the inclination to refer.转介至物理治疗:转介数量、转介指征与转介倾向之间的关系。
Soc Sci Med. 1990;30(7):797-804. doi: 10.1016/0277-9536(90)90203-5.
7
Patient experiences and the association with organizational factors in general practice: results from the Norwegian part of the international, multi-centre, cross-sectional QUALICOPC study.患者体验及其与全科医疗组织因素的关联:国际多中心横断面QUALICOPC研究挪威部分的结果
BMC Health Serv Res. 2016 Aug 24;16(1):428. doi: 10.1186/s12913-016-1684-z.
8
[The value of joint general practitioner and rheumatologist consultations in primary care patients].[全科医生与风湿病专家联合会诊对基层医疗患者的价值]
Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2003 Mar 8;147(10):447-50.
9
Influencing referral practice using feedback of adherence to NICE guidelines: a quality improvement report for dyspepsia.利用遵循英国国家卫生与临床优化研究所(NICE)指南的反馈来影响转诊实践:一份消化不良的质量改进报告
Qual Saf Health Care. 2007 Feb;16(1):67-70. doi: 10.1136/qshc.2006.019992.
10
Developing a 'consultation quality index' (CQI) for use in general practice.开发一种用于全科医疗的“会诊质量指标”(CQI)。
Fam Pract. 2000 Dec;17(6):455-61. doi: 10.1093/fampra/17.6.455.

引用本文的文献

1
Group practice impacts on patients, physicians and healthcare systems: a scoping review.团体实践对患者、医生和医疗保健系统的影响:范围综述。
BMJ Open. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):e041579. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-041579.