As time goes by: Stakeholder opinions on the implementation and use of a virtual patient simulation system.

BACKGROUND

Stakeholder opinions on the implementation of a particular virtual patient application might prove important for decision-making and implementation efforts in general. This study aimed to capitalize on experiences originated from two post-implementation settings of Web-based Simulation of Patients (Web-SP).

METHOD

We conducted a cross-sectional survey of stakeholder opinions (39 students, teachers, course directors, and university leaders) on the implementation and use of Web-SP in Colombia and Sweden, using a mixed method approach.

RESULTS

The respondents did not show equal preference in rating the ranking of the order of importance included in the variables (Friedman's Chi square: 26.5 to 115.1, df = 6, p < 0.001, Kendall's coefficient of concordance ranging from 0.11 to 0.50). The answers provided as free comments supported the statistical findings on the importance of end-user customization, need for authenticity in software design, and use of virtual patient simulations in a curricular context, for clinical reasoning development.

CONCLUSIONS

Virtual Patient design should allow extensive editing, support case authenticity and enhance clinical reasoning abilities, in an effort for ensuring accountability and sustainable development of the field.