School of Psychology, Washington Singer Laboratories, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
J Palliat Med. 2010 Nov;13(11):1345-8. doi: 10.1089/jpm.2010.0139. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
This study is the first to explore how rumination or recurrent dwelling may contribute to psychological distress in palliative care. We hypothesised that rumination is important in palliative care because: (1) rumination is triggered by significant life events; (2) the diagnosis of a life-limiting illness means the reevaluation of a number of personal goals, which may become unattainable, and, thereby, lead to rumination; (3) palliative care patients and caregivers report a number of existential concerns, which in their style and content are characteristic of rumination.
This study adopted a cross-sectional design, comparing samples of palliative care patients (n = 36), their caregivers (n = 29), and an age-matched control group (n = 30). Participants completed a combination of standardized questionnaires to assess their levels of anxiety, depression, and rumination, and open-ended interviews to identify the concerns they were ruminating on and their idiosyncratic experience of rumination.
As predicted, palliative care patients and their caregivers reported significantly more psychological distress than the control group. Palliative care patients and their caregivers also reported significantly more rumination on existential concerns (e.g., about the future) than the control group. The frequency of existential concerns and measures of rumination reported by participants positively correlated with increased psychological distress.
The results support the importance of addressing rumination on existential concerns in palliative care because of its association with psychological distress. Rumination was identified as a mechanism that may be important in addressing psychological distress in palliative care.
本研究首次探讨了反刍或反复思考如何导致姑息治疗中的心理困扰。我们假设反刍在姑息治疗中很重要,原因有三:(1)反刍是由重大生活事件引发的;(2)绝症诊断意味着需要重新评估许多个人目标,这些目标可能变得无法实现,从而导致反刍;(3)姑息治疗患者及其护理人员报告了许多存在性问题,这些问题在其风格和内容上都具有反刍的特点。
本研究采用横断面设计,比较了姑息治疗患者(n=36)、其护理人员(n=29)和年龄匹配的对照组(n=30)的样本。参与者完成了一系列标准化问卷,以评估他们的焦虑、抑郁和反刍水平,并进行了开放式访谈,以确定他们反刍的关注点以及他们独特的反刍体验。
正如预测的那样,姑息治疗患者及其护理人员的心理困扰程度明显高于对照组。姑息治疗患者及其护理人员对存在性问题(如对未来的担忧)的反刍也明显多于对照组。参与者报告的存在性问题的频率和反刍程度与心理困扰的增加呈正相关。
研究结果支持在姑息治疗中关注对存在性问题的反刍,因为其与心理困扰有关。反刍被确定为一种可能在姑息治疗中处理心理困扰的重要机制。