• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

残疾儿童和非残疾儿童手技能评估的 Rasch 分析。

Rasch analysis of the assessment of children's hand skills in children with and without disabilities.

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, Faculty of Medicine, Nursing and Health Sciences, Monash University-Peninsula Campus, Frankston, Victoria, Australia.

出版信息

Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.022. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.022
PMID:21041063
Abstract

The Assessment of Children's Hand Skills (ACHS) is a new assessment tool that utilizes a naturalistic observational method to capture children's real-life hand skill performance when engaging in various types of activities. The ACHS also intends to be used with both typically developing children and those presenting with disabilities. The purpose of this study was to further investigate the construct validity of the ACHS using the Rasch analysis. Participants included 64 typically developing children and 70 children with disabilities in the age range of 2-12 years. Rasch analysis results confirmed the appropriateness of the ACHS's 6-level rating scale in this combined group of children. All 22 activity items and 19 of the 20 hand skill items in the ACHS formed a unidimensional scale and were ordered according to difficulty as clinically and developmentally expected. The ACHS also exhibited sufficient response validity and item-difficulty range when applied to children with disabilities as well as typically developing, preschool-age children. Furthermore, less than half of the ACHS items were found to exhibit differential item functioning with regard to gender (5 activity items) and disability (2 activity items and 7 hand skill items). Therefore, the ACHS shows preliminary evidence of construct validity for its clinical use in assessing children's hand skill performance in real-life contexts.

摘要

《儿童手部技能评估量表》(ACHS)是一种新的评估工具,采用自然观察法,在儿童参与各种活动时捕捉其真实的手部技能表现。该量表也旨在用于评估正常发育的儿童和有残疾的儿童。本研究旨在进一步使用 Rasch 分析探讨 ACHS 的结构效度。参与者包括 64 名正常发育的儿童和 70 名 2-12 岁有残疾的儿童。Rasch 分析结果证实,在这组混合儿童中,ACHS 的 6 级评分量表是合适的。ACHS 的所有 22 项活动项目和 20 项手部技能项目中的 19 项都形成了一个一维尺度,并按照临床和发育预期的难度顺序排列。当应用于残疾儿童和正常发育的学龄前儿童时,ACHS 还表现出足够的反应有效性和项目难度范围。此外,只有不到一半的 ACHS 项目在性别(5 项活动项目)和残疾(2 项活动项目和 7 项手部技能项目)方面表现出项目区分功能的差异。因此,ACHS 在评估儿童在现实生活情境中的手部技能表现方面,具有初步的结构效度证据,可用于临床。

相似文献

1
Rasch analysis of the assessment of children's hand skills in children with and without disabilities.残疾儿童和非残疾儿童手技能评估的 Rasch 分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2011 Jan-Feb;32(1):253-61. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.09.022. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
2
Examining construct validity of a new naturalistic observational assessment of hand skills for preschool- and school-age children.检验一种针对学龄前和学龄儿童手部技能的新型自然观察评估方法的结构效度。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Apr;59(2):108-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.00997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
3
Construct validity of the Children's Hand-Skills ability Questionnaire (CHSQ) in children with disabilities: a Rasch analysis.残疾儿童手技能问卷(CHSQ)的结构效度:一项 Rasch 分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2012 Jul-Aug;33(4):1242-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2012.02.023. Epub 2012 Mar 22.
4
Cross-cultural validity of a naturalistic observational assessment of children's hand skills: a study using Rasch analysis.跨文化有效性的自然观察评估儿童手部技能:使用拉什分析的研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;43(7):631-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0827.
5
Examining content validity and reliability of the Assessment of Children's Hand Skills (ACHS): a preliminary study.评估儿童手部技能量表(ACHS)的内容效度和信度研究:一项初步研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):756-67. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.08158.
6
The contributing role of real-life hand skill performance in self-care function of children with and without disabilities.现实生活中的手部技能表现对残疾和非残疾儿童自我护理功能的促进作用。
Child Care Health Dev. 2014 Jan;40(1):134-44. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2012.01429.x. Epub 2012 Aug 29.
7
Rasch analysis of the Bruininks-Oseretsky Test of Motor Proficiency-Second Edition in intellectual disabilities.智力障碍者第二版布鲁因克斯-奥塞尔斯基运动技能测试的 Rasch 分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Nov-Dec;30(6):1132-44. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.03.003. Epub 2009 Apr 22.
8
A framework of children's hand skills for assessment and intervention.一个用于评估和干预的儿童手部技能框架。
Child Care Health Dev. 2009 Nov;35(6):873-84. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2214.2009.01002.x. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
9
Rasch analysis of the Developmental Test of Visual-Motor Integration in children with intellectual disabilities.智力障碍儿童视觉运动整合发育测试的拉施分析。
Res Dev Disabil. 2009 Sep-Oct;30(5):1044-53. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2009.02.007. Epub 2009 Mar 18.
10
Development and initial validation of the Preschooler Gross Motor Quality Scale.发展与初步验证学前儿童粗大运动质量量表。
Res Dev Disabil. 2010 Nov-Dec;31(6):1187-96. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2010.08.002. Epub 2010 Sep 16.

引用本文的文献

1
Clinical Tools for Assessing One-Handed Skills in Children With Cerebral Palsy: An Umbrella Review.评估脑瘫儿童单手技能的临床工具:一项伞状综述。
Occup Ther Int. 2025 Jun 23;2025:8847527. doi: 10.1155/oti/8847527. eCollection 2025.
2
In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
3
Peabody Developmental Motor Scales-2: The Use of Rasch Analysis to Examine the Model Unidimensionality, Motor Function, and Item Difficulty.
皮博迪发展运动量表 - 第二版:运用拉施分析检验模型单维性、运动功能及项目难度
Front Pediatr. 2022 Apr 20;10:852732. doi: 10.3389/fped.2022.852732. eCollection 2022.
4
Development and Validation of the Celiac Disease-Children's Activities Report (CD-Chart) for Promoting Self-Management among Children and Adolescents.《乳糜泻儿童活动报告(CD-Chart)的制定与验证:促进儿童和青少年自我管理》
Nutrients. 2017 Oct 17;9(10):1130. doi: 10.3390/nu9101130.
5
Measuring patient-reported outcomes: moving beyond misplaced common sense to hard science.衡量患者报告的结果:超越错位的常识,走向坚实的科学。
BMC Med. 2011 Jul 14;9:86. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-9-86.