Suppr超能文献

儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述

In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.

作者信息

Kruger Annelize, Strauss Monique, Visser Marieta

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

Abstract

AIM

Accurate assessment of in-hand manipulation is imperative when treating children with fine motor delays. A clinically suitable instrument for in-hand manipulation is required to inform the paediatric developmental and rehabilitation context. Critical evaluation of the available instrument is required to make an informed decision and direct future research. The aim of the study was to assess the available literature with a view to writing a scoping review on in-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children.

METHODS

The Arskey and O'Malley six-stage scoping review was applied. Fifteen databases were sourced for articles published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2020. After identifying 33 eligible articles that met the inclusion criteria, the data obtained from the articles were charted.

RESULTS

Eleven in-hand manipulation assessment instruments were identified and summarised according to (i) the constructs of in-hand manipulation included; (ii) clinical utility aspects of applicability and practicality and (iii) psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION

At the time of the review, none of the instruments had comprehensively completed the instrument development process to the point of standardisation with evaluated psychometric properties. Further research is recommended for the development of a gold standard in-hand manipulation assessment instrument.

摘要

目的

在治疗有精细运动发育迟缓的儿童时,准确评估手中操作能力至关重要。需要一种临床上适用的手中操作评估工具,为儿科发育和康复情况提供依据。需要对现有工具进行批判性评估,以便做出明智的决定并指导未来的研究。本研究的目的是评估现有文献,以期撰写一篇关于儿童手中操作评估工具的范围综述。

方法

采用阿斯基和奥马利的六阶段范围综述法。检索了15个数据库,查找1990年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间发表的文章。在确定了33篇符合纳入标准的合格文章后,对从这些文章中获得的数据进行了制表。

结果

识别出11种手中操作评估工具,并根据以下方面进行了总结:(i)所包含的手中操作结构;(ii)适用性和实用性等临床效用方面;(iii)心理测量特性。

结论

在进行综述时,没有一种工具全面完成工具开发过程并达到具有评估心理测量特性的标准化程度。建议进一步开展研究,以开发一种金标准的手中操作评估工具。

相似文献

1
In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

本文引用的文献

2
Development and initial validity of the in-hand manipulation assessment.手中操作评估的开发与初步效度
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Apr;65(2):135-145. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12447. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
5
Predictive validity of kindergarten assessments on handwriting readiness.幼儿园评估对手写准备情况的预测效度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jan;36C:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
6
Reliability of the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting on Flemish children.
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Fall;26(3):318-24. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000050.
9
Standardized tests of handwriting readiness: a systematic review of the literature.笔迹准备能力的标准化测试:文献系统综述。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Jun;53(6):506-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03895.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验