• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述

In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.

作者信息

Kruger Annelize, Strauss Monique, Visser Marieta

机构信息

Department of Occupational Therapy, School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of the Free State, Bloemfontein, South Africa.

出版信息

Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.

DOI:10.1177/03080226211037859
PMID:40336785
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12033819/
Abstract

AIM

Accurate assessment of in-hand manipulation is imperative when treating children with fine motor delays. A clinically suitable instrument for in-hand manipulation is required to inform the paediatric developmental and rehabilitation context. Critical evaluation of the available instrument is required to make an informed decision and direct future research. The aim of the study was to assess the available literature with a view to writing a scoping review on in-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children.

METHODS

The Arskey and O'Malley six-stage scoping review was applied. Fifteen databases were sourced for articles published between 1 January 1990 and 31 December 2020. After identifying 33 eligible articles that met the inclusion criteria, the data obtained from the articles were charted.

RESULTS

Eleven in-hand manipulation assessment instruments were identified and summarised according to (i) the constructs of in-hand manipulation included; (ii) clinical utility aspects of applicability and practicality and (iii) psychometric properties.

CONCLUSION

At the time of the review, none of the instruments had comprehensively completed the instrument development process to the point of standardisation with evaluated psychometric properties. Further research is recommended for the development of a gold standard in-hand manipulation assessment instrument.

摘要

目的

在治疗有精细运动发育迟缓的儿童时,准确评估手中操作能力至关重要。需要一种临床上适用的手中操作评估工具,为儿科发育和康复情况提供依据。需要对现有工具进行批判性评估,以便做出明智的决定并指导未来的研究。本研究的目的是评估现有文献,以期撰写一篇关于儿童手中操作评估工具的范围综述。

方法

采用阿斯基和奥马利的六阶段范围综述法。检索了15个数据库,查找1990年1月1日至2020年12月31日期间发表的文章。在确定了33篇符合纳入标准的合格文章后,对从这些文章中获得的数据进行了制表。

结果

识别出11种手中操作评估工具,并根据以下方面进行了总结:(i)所包含的手中操作结构;(ii)适用性和实用性等临床效用方面;(iii)心理测量特性。

结论

在进行综述时,没有一种工具全面完成工具开发过程并达到具有评估心理测量特性的标准化程度。建议进一步开展研究,以开发一种金标准的手中操作评估工具。

相似文献

1
In-hand manipulation assessment instruments for children: A scoping review.儿童手部操作评估工具:一项范围综述
Br J Occup Ther. 2022 Feb;85(2):83-98. doi: 10.1177/03080226211037859. Epub 2021 Nov 23.
2
Instruments assessing nurse educator's competence: A scoping review.评估护士教育者能力的工具:范围综述。
Nurs Open. 2023 Apr;10(4):1985-2002. doi: 10.1002/nop2.1479. Epub 2022 Nov 20.
3
Ethics of Procuring and Using Organs or Tissue from Infants and Newborns for Transplantation, Research, or Commercial Purposes: Protocol for a Bioethics Scoping Review.从婴儿和新生儿获取器官或组织用于移植、研究或商业目的的伦理问题:生物伦理学范围审查方案
Wellcome Open Res. 2024 Dec 5;9:717. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.23235.1. eCollection 2024.
4
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
5
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
6
Systematic Review of the Psychometric Performance of Generic Childhood Multi-attribute Utility Instruments.系统评价通用儿童多属性效用工具的心理计量性能。
Appl Health Econ Health Policy. 2023 Jul;21(4):559-584. doi: 10.1007/s40258-023-00806-8. Epub 2023 May 3.
7
Psychometric properties of instruments for measuring abuse of older people in community and institutional settings: A systematic review.社区和机构环境中老年人虐待情况测量工具的心理测量特性:一项系统综述。
Campbell Syst Rev. 2024 Aug 29;20(3):e1419. doi: 10.1002/cl2.1419. eCollection 2024 Sep.
8
Parent-report instruments for assessing feeding difficulties in children with neurological impairments: a systematic review.家长报告工具评估神经发育障碍儿童喂养困难:系统评价。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2019 Feb;61(2):135-144. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.13986. Epub 2018 Aug 5.
9
Defining, conceptualizing and evaluating pragmatic qualities of quantitative instruments measuring implementation determinants and outcomes: a scoping and critical review of the literature and recommendations for future research.定义、概念化和评估定量工具测量实施决定因素和结果的实用品质:文献综述和未来研究建议的范围界定和批判性评价。
Transl Behav Med. 2022 Nov 21;12(11):1049-1064. doi: 10.1093/tbm/ibac064.
10
A Systematic Review of Instruments to Identify Mental Health and Substance Use Problems Among Children in the Emergency Department.急诊科中用于识别儿童心理健康和物质使用问题的工具的系统评价
Acad Emerg Med. 2017 May;24(5):552-568. doi: 10.1111/acem.13162. Epub 2017 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Relationship between screen-time and hand function, play and sensory processing in children without disabilities aged 4-7 years: A exploratory study.4至7岁无残疾儿童的屏幕使用时间与手部功能、玩耍及感觉统合之间的关系:一项探索性研究。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2020 Aug;67(4):297-308. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12650. Epub 2020 Jan 30.
2
Development and initial validity of the in-hand manipulation assessment.手中操作评估的开发与初步效度
Aust Occup Ther J. 2018 Apr;65(2):135-145. doi: 10.1111/1440-1630.12447. Epub 2018 Jan 17.
3
A Guideline of Selecting and Reporting Intraclass Correlation Coefficients for Reliability Research.可靠性研究中组内相关系数选择与报告指南
J Chiropr Med. 2016 Jun;15(2):155-63. doi: 10.1016/j.jcm.2016.02.012. Epub 2016 Mar 31.
4
Evaluating fine motor coordination in children who are not ready for handwriting: which test should we take?评估尚未准备好书写的儿童的精细运动协调性:我们应该采用哪种测试?
Occup Ther Int. 2015 Jun;22(2):61-70. doi: 10.1002/oti.1385. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
5
Predictive validity of kindergarten assessments on handwriting readiness.幼儿园评估对手写准备情况的预测效度。
Res Dev Disabil. 2015 Jan;36C:114-124. doi: 10.1016/j.ridd.2014.08.014. Epub 2014 Oct 16.
6
Reliability of the detailed assessment of speed of handwriting on Flemish children.
Pediatr Phys Ther. 2014 Fall;26(3):318-24. doi: 10.1097/PEP.0000000000000050.
7
Examining construct validity of a new naturalistic observational assessment of hand skills for preschool- and school-age children.检验一种针对学龄前和学龄儿童手部技能的新型自然观察评估方法的结构效度。
Aust Occup Ther J. 2012 Apr;59(2):108-20. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1630.2012.00997.x. Epub 2012 Mar 1.
8
Cross-cultural validity of a naturalistic observational assessment of children's hand skills: a study using Rasch analysis.跨文化有效性的自然观察评估儿童手部技能:使用拉什分析的研究。
J Rehabil Med. 2011 Jun;43(7):631-7. doi: 10.2340/16501977-0827.
9
Standardized tests of handwriting readiness: a systematic review of the literature.笔迹准备能力的标准化测试:文献系统综述。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2011 Jun;53(6):506-15. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8749.2010.03895.x. Epub 2011 Feb 11.
10
Examining content validity and reliability of the Assessment of Children's Hand Skills (ACHS): a preliminary study.评估儿童手部技能量表(ACHS)的内容效度和信度研究:一项初步研究。
Am J Occup Ther. 2010 Sep-Oct;64(5):756-67. doi: 10.5014/ajot.2010.08158.