• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在 18154 名精神分裂症患者的真实世界应用中,齐拉西酮与奥氮平相关的死亡率比较:齐拉西酮心脏结局观察研究(ZODIAC)。

Comparative mortality associated with ziprasidone and olanzapine in real-world use among 18,154 patients with schizophrenia: The Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC).

机构信息

Department of Biostatistics and Epidemiology, the Center for Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of Pennsylvania School of Medicine, Philadelphia, 19104-6021, USA.

出版信息

Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;168(2):193-201. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.08040484. Epub 2010 Nov 1.

DOI:10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.08040484
PMID:21041245
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The authors compared 1-year mortality rates associated with ziprasidone and olanzapine in real-world use.

METHOD

The Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC) was an open-label, randomized, postmarketing large simple trial that enrolled patients with schizophrenia (N=18,154) in naturalistic practice in 18 countries. The primary outcome measure was nonsuicide mortality in the year after initiation of assigned treatment. Patients were randomly assigned to receive treatment with either ziprasidone or olanzapine and followed for 1 year by unblinded investigators providing usual care. A physician-administered questionnaire was used to collect baseline demographic information, medical and psychiatric history, and concomitant medication use. Follow-up information on hospitalizations and emergency department visits, patients' vital status, and current antipsychotic drug status was collected and reported by treating psychiatrists. Post hoc analyses of sudden death, a secondary endpoint, were also conducted.

RESULTS

The incidence of nonsuicide mortality within 1 year of initiating pharmacotherapy was 0.91 for ziprasidone (N=9,077) and 0.90 for olanzapine (N=9,077). The relative risk was 1.02 (95% CI=0.76-1.39). This finding was confirmed in numerous secondary and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the known risk of QTc prolongation with ziprasidone treatment, the findings of this study failed to show that ziprasidone is associated with an elevated risk of nonsuicidal mortality relative to olanzapine in real-world use; the study excludes a relative risk larger than 1.39 with a high probability. However, the study was neither powered nor designed to examine the risk of rare events like torsade de pointes.

摘要

目的

作者比较了在真实环境中使用齐拉西酮和奥氮平的 1 年死亡率。

方法

齐拉西酮观察性心脏结局研究(ZODIAC)是一项开放标签、随机、上市后大型简单试验,在 18 个国家的自然环境中招募了精神分裂症患者(N=18154)。主要结局指标是起始治疗后 1 年内非自杀性死亡率。患者被随机分配接受齐拉西酮或奥氮平治疗,并由未设盲的研究者提供常规护理,随访 1 年。采用医生管理的问卷收集基线人口统计学信息、医疗和精神病史以及同时使用的药物。通过治疗精神科医生收集和报告关于住院和急诊就诊、患者的生命状态和当前抗精神病药物状态的随访信息。还进行了次要终点猝死的事后分析。

结果

起始药物治疗后 1 年内非自杀性死亡率,齐拉西酮为 0.91(N=9077),奥氮平为 0.90(N=9077)。相对风险为 1.02(95%CI=0.76-1.39)。这一发现在许多次要和敏感性分析中得到了证实。

结论

尽管已知齐拉西酮治疗与 QTc 延长有关,但这项研究的结果并未表明在真实环境中,齐拉西酮与奥氮平相比,非自杀性死亡率的风险升高;该研究极有可能排除相对风险大于 1.39 的情况。然而,该研究既没有足够的效力也没有设计来检查罕见事件(如尖端扭转型室速)的风险。

相似文献

1
Comparative mortality associated with ziprasidone and olanzapine in real-world use among 18,154 patients with schizophrenia: The Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC).在 18154 名精神分裂症患者的真实世界应用中,齐拉西酮与奥氮平相关的死亡率比较:齐拉西酮心脏结局观察研究(ZODIAC)。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;168(2):193-201. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2010.08040484. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
2
Methodological challenges in the coding and adjudication of sudden deaths in a large simple trial with observational follow-up: the ziprasidone observational study of cardiac outcomes (ZODIAC).大型单纯试验伴观察随访中编码和裁定猝死的方法学挑战:齐拉西酮心脏结局观察研究(ZODIAC)。
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2011 Nov;20(11):1192-8. doi: 10.1002/pds.2185. Epub 2011 Jul 27.
3
The Ziprasidone Observational Study of Cardiac Outcomes (ZODIAC): design and baseline subject characteristics.齐拉西酮心脏转归观察性研究(ZODIAC):设计与受试者基线特征
J Clin Psychiatry. 2008 Jan;69(1):114-21. doi: 10.4088/jcp.v69n0115.
4
Completed and attempted suicides among 18,154 subjects with schizophrenia included in a large simple trial.一项大型简易试验纳入的18154例精神分裂症患者中的自杀既遂和自杀未遂情况。
J Clin Psychiatry. 2014 Mar;75(3):e184-90. doi: 10.4088/JCP.13m08563.
5
Ziprasidone and the corrected QT interval: a comprehensive summary of clinical data.齐拉西酮与校正 QT 间期:临床数据的综合总结。
CNS Drugs. 2012 Apr 1;26(4):351-65. doi: 10.2165/11599010-000000000-00000.
6
Ziprasidone in the management of schizophrenia : the QT interval issue in context.齐拉西酮治疗精神分裂症:QT间期问题剖析
CNS Drugs. 2003;17(6):423-30. doi: 10.2165/00023210-200317060-00004.
7
Randomized, controlled, double-blind multicenter comparison of the efficacy and tolerability of ziprasidone and olanzapine in acutely ill inpatients with schizophrenia or schizoaffective disorder.齐拉西酮与奥氮平治疗急性精神分裂症或分裂情感性障碍住院患者疗效和耐受性的随机、对照、双盲多中心比较
Am J Psychiatry. 2004 Oct;161(10):1837-47. doi: 10.1176/ajp.161.10.1837.
8
Olanzapine versus ziprasidone: results of a 28-week double-blind study in patients with schizophrenia.奥氮平与齐拉西酮对比:一项针对精神分裂症患者的28周双盲研究结果
Am J Psychiatry. 2005 Oct;162(10):1879-87. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.162.10.1879.
9
Question regarding ziprasidone and QTc interval prolongation in the ZODIAC study.关于齐拉西酮与“ZODIAC研究”中QTc间期延长的问题。
Am J Psychiatry. 2011 Jun;168(6):650-1; author reply 651. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2011.11020288.
10
An open, large, 6-month naturalistic study of outcome in schizophrenic outpatients, treated with olanzapine.一项针对使用奥氮平治疗的精神分裂症门诊患者结局的开放性、大型、为期6个月的自然主义研究。
Hum Psychopharmacol. 2011 Jan;26(1):81-5. doi: 10.1002/hup.1173. Epub 2011 Feb 9.

引用本文的文献

1
Updated rationale for the initial antipsychotic selection for patients with schizophrenia.精神分裂症患者初始抗精神病药物选择的更新依据。
Schizophrenia (Heidelb). 2024 Sep 2;10(1):74. doi: 10.1038/s41537-024-00492-y.
2
Drug-induced Sudden Death: A Scoping Review.药物性猝死:范围综述。
Curr Drug Saf. 2023;18(3):307-317. doi: 10.2174/1574886317666220525115232.
3
Mortality in people with schizophrenia: a systematic review and meta-analysis of relative risk and aggravating or attenuating factors.精神分裂症患者的死亡率:相对风险以及加重或减轻因素的系统评价和荟萃分析
World Psychiatry. 2022 Jun;21(2):248-271. doi: 10.1002/wps.20994.
4
Antipsychotic Polypharmacy-Related Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality: A Comprehensive Review.抗精神病药物联合使用相关的心血管发病率和死亡率:一项全面综述。
Neurol Int. 2022 Mar 17;14(1):294-309. doi: 10.3390/neurolint14010024.
5
Evaluating the cost and clinical effectiveness of long-acting, injectable aripiprazole and paliperidone palmitate once a month in a real-world setting.在真实环境中评估长效注射用阿立哌唑和棕榈酸帕利哌酮每月一次给药的成本及临床疗效。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2019 Aug 13;11:517-524. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S191198. eCollection 2019.
6
Pharmacoepidemiology: Using randomised control trials and observational studies in clinical decision-making.药物流行病学:在临床决策中使用随机对照试验和观察性研究。
Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2019 Sep;85(9):1907-1924. doi: 10.1111/bcp.14024. Epub 2019 Jul 24.
7
Long-term effectiveness of oral second-generation antipsychotics in patients with schizophrenia and related disorders: a systematic review and meta-analysis of direct head-to-head comparisons.口服第二代抗精神病药物治疗精神分裂症及相关障碍患者的长期疗效:直接头对头比较的系统评价和荟萃分析
World Psychiatry. 2019 Jun;18(2):208-224. doi: 10.1002/wps.20632.
8
A Structured Preapproval and Postapproval Comparative Study Design Framework to Generate Valid and Transparent Real-World Evidence for Regulatory Decisions.一种用于为监管决策生成有效且透明的真实世界证据的结构化预批准和后批准比较研究设计框架。
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2019 Jul;106(1):103-115. doi: 10.1002/cpt.1480. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
9
Comparison of Olanzapine versus Other Second-Generation Antipsychotics in the Improvement of Insight and Medication Discontinuation Rate in Schizophrenia.奥氮平与其他第二代抗精神病药物在改善精神分裂症患者自知力及停药率方面的比较
Shanghai Arch Psychiatry. 2018 Jun 25;30(3):178-187. doi: 10.11919/j.issn.1002-0829.217087.
10
Maximizing response to first-line antipsychotics in schizophrenia: a review focused on finding from meta-analysis.最大限度提高精神分裂症一线抗精神病药物的反应:一项基于荟萃分析结果的综述。
Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2019 Feb;236(2):545-559. doi: 10.1007/s00213-018-5133-z. Epub 2018 Nov 30.