Koch Tom
Information Outreach, Ltd., 136 Hammersmith Ave., Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
J Med Philos. 2010 Dec;35(6):685-99. doi: 10.1093/jmp/jhq051. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
Transhumanists advance a "posthuman" condition in which technological and genetic enhancements will transform humankind. They are joined in this goal by bioethicists arguing for genetic selection as a means of "enhancing evolution," improving if not also the species then at least the potential lives of future individuals. The argument of both, this paper argues, is a new riff on the old eugenics tune. As ever, it is done in the name of science and its presumed knowledge base. As ever, the result is destructive rather than instructive, bad faith promoted as high ideal. The paper concludes with the argument that species advancement is possible but in a manner thoroughly distinct from that advanced by either of these groups.
超人类主义者提出了一种“后人类”状态,在这种状态下,技术和基因增强将改变人类。主张基因选择作为“促进进化”手段的生物伦理学家也认同这一目标,认为即便不能改善物种,至少也能改善未来个体的潜在生命。本文认为,这两者的观点都是老调重弹的新优生学论调。一如既往,这是以科学及其假定的知识基础之名进行的。一如既往,结果是具有破坏性而非启发性的,恶意被鼓吹为崇高理想。本文最后指出,物种进步是可能的,但方式与这两个群体所倡导的截然不同。