• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

亚特兰大急性胰腺炎严重程度分类的更新:是否应包括中度类别?

Update of the Atlanta Classification of severity of acute pancreatitis: should a moderate category be included?

机构信息

Unidad de Gastroenterología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, España.

出版信息

Pancreatology. 2010;10(5):613-9. doi: 10.1159/000308795. Epub 2010 Oct 30.

DOI:10.1159/000308795
PMID:21042037
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Persistent and multiple organ failure (POF and MOF) are predictive of death in acute pancreatitis (AP). Local complications without organ failure are associated with morbidity but a low risk of mortality.

AIM

To design a three-category classification of AP severity and to compare it with the Atlanta Classification (AC) in terms of morbidity and mortality.

METHOD

Severe AP was defined as death, POF (>48 h) or MOF. Moderate AP was defined as the presence of acute collections and/or pancreatic necrosis. Mild AP was defined by exclusion. We compared this classification with AC in 144 episodes of AP.

RESULTS

In the three-category classification, severe AP was associated with significantly more frequent intensive care unit admission, invasive treatment and mortality than moderate and mild AP (p < 0.01). Severe AP patients required longer hospital stay and more nutritional support than mild AP patients (p < 0.01). Patients with moderate AP had significantly longer hospital stay and more need for nutritional support than patients with mild AP (p < 0.01). Five patients died, all of them with MOF and/or POF.

CONCLUSIONS

A three-category classification distinguishes three homogeneous groups of severity.

摘要

背景

持续性和多器官衰竭(POF 和 MOF)是急性胰腺炎(AP)死亡的预测因素。无器官衰竭的局部并发症与发病率相关,但死亡率低。

目的

设计一种急性胰腺炎严重程度的三分类,并与亚特兰大分类(AC)在发病率和死亡率方面进行比较。

方法

严重 AP 定义为死亡、POF(>48 小时)或 MOF。中度 AP 定义为存在急性积聚和/或胰腺坏死。轻度 AP 通过排除来定义。我们将这种分类与 144 例 AP 进行了比较。

结果

在三分类中,严重 AP 与 ICU 入院、侵袭性治疗和死亡率明显高于中度和轻度 AP 相关(p < 0.01)。严重 AP 患者的住院时间和营养支持需求明显高于轻度 AP 患者(p < 0.01)。中度 AP 患者的住院时间和营养支持需求明显长于轻度 AP 患者(p < 0.01)。5 例患者死亡,均伴有 MOF 和/或 POF。

结论

三分类可区分三种严重程度均一的组别。

相似文献

1
Update of the Atlanta Classification of severity of acute pancreatitis: should a moderate category be included?亚特兰大急性胰腺炎严重程度分类的更新:是否应包括中度类别?
Pancreatology. 2010;10(5):613-9. doi: 10.1159/000308795. Epub 2010 Oct 30.
2
Low mortality and high morbidity in severe acute pancreatitis without organ failure: a case for revising the Atlanta classification to include "moderately severe acute pancreatitis".无器官功能衰竭的重症急性胰腺炎死亡率低但发病率高:修订亚特兰大分类以纳入“中度重症急性胰腺炎”的理由
Am J Gastroenterol. 2009 Mar;104(3):710-5. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2008.77. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
3
Clinical relevance of the revised Atlanta classification focusing on severity stratification system.聚焦严重程度分层系统的修订版亚特兰大分类法的临床相关性。
Pancreatology. 2014 Sep-Oct;14(5):324-9. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.08.001. Epub 2014 Aug 19.
4
Validation of the determinant-based classification and revision of the Atlanta classification systems for acute pancreatitis.基于分类的判定标准的确证和急性胰腺炎亚特兰大分类系统的修订。
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014 Feb;12(2):311-6. doi: 10.1016/j.cgh.2013.07.042. Epub 2013 Aug 16.
5
Clinical utility of the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis in a prospective cohort: have all loose ends been tied?修订版亚特兰大急性胰腺炎分类在一项前瞻性队列研究中的临床实用性:所有问题都解决了吗?
Pancreatology. 2014 Jul-Aug;14(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 20.
6
Prospective validation of 4-category classification of acute pancreatitis severity.前瞻性验证急性胰腺炎严重程度的 4 分类法。
Pancreas. 2013 Apr;42(3):392-6. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e3182730d19.
7
Validation of the moderate severity category of acute pancreatitis defined by determinant-based classification.基于决定因素分类法定义的中度重症急性胰腺炎的验证
Hepatobiliary Pancreat Dis Int. 2014 Jun;13(3):323-7. doi: 10.1016/s1499-3872(14)60255-1.
8
[Importance of a clinical protocol in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis].[临床方案在重症急性胰腺炎治疗中的重要性]
Zentralbl Chir. 2002 Nov;127(11):975-81. doi: 10.1055/s-2002-35761.
9
Long-term results and quality of life of patients undergoing sequential surgical treatment for severe acute pancreatitis complicated by infected pancreatic necrosis.重症急性胰腺炎合并感染性胰腺坏死患者序贯手术治疗的长期结果及生活质量
Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2006;7 Suppl 2:S113-6. doi: 10.1089/sur.2006.7.s2-113.
10
Comparison of BISAP, Ranson's, APACHE-II, and CTSI scores in predicting organ failure, complications, and mortality in acute pancreatitis.比较 BISAP、Ranson's、APACHE-II 和 CTSI 评分在预测急性胰腺炎器官衰竭、并发症和死亡率中的作用。
Am J Gastroenterol. 2010 Feb;105(2):435-41; quiz 442. doi: 10.1038/ajg.2009.622. Epub 2009 Oct 27.

引用本文的文献

1
Plasma D-Dimer Level Is an Early Predictor of Severity of Acute Pancreatitis Based on 2012 Atlanta Classification.基于 2012 年亚特兰大分类,血浆 D-二聚体水平是急性胰腺炎严重程度的早期预测指标。
Med Sci Monit. 2019 Nov 27;25:9019-9027. doi: 10.12659/MSM.918311.
2
RNA sequence analysis of rat acute experimental pancreatitis with and without fatty liver: a gene expression profiling comparative study.大鼠急性实验性胰腺炎伴或不伴脂肪肝的 RNA 序列分析:基因表达谱比较研究。
Sci Rep. 2017 Apr 7;7(1):734. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-00821-5.
3
Association between severity and the determinant-based classification, Atlanta 2012 and Atlanta 1992, in acute pancreatitis: a clinical retrospective study.
急性胰腺炎中严重程度与基于决定因素的分类(2012年亚特兰大分类和1992年亚特兰大分类)之间的关联:一项临床回顾性研究
Medicine (Baltimore). 2015 Apr;94(13):e638. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000000638.
4
Resistin is not an appropriate biochemical marker to predict severity of acute pancreatitis: a case-controlled study.抵抗素并非预测急性胰腺炎严重程度的合适生化标志物:一项病例对照研究。
World J Gastroenterol. 2014 Nov 7;20(41):15351-7. doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i41.15351.
5
The classification of acute pancreatitis: Current status.急性胰腺炎的分类:现状
Intractable Rare Dis Res. 2012 Aug;1(3):134-7. doi: 10.5582/irdr.v1.3.134.
6
Failure to follow evidence-based best practice guidelines in the treatment of severe acute pancreatitis.未能遵循基于证据的最佳实践指南治疗重症急性胰腺炎。
HPB (Oxford). 2013 Oct;15(10):822-7. doi: 10.1111/hpb.12140.
7
Early routine endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography strategy versus early conservative management strategy in acute gallstone pancreatitis.急性胆石性胰腺炎的早期常规内镜逆行胰胆管造影术策略与早期保守治疗策略比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012 May 16;2012(5):CD009779. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009779.pub2.