Suppr超能文献

修订版亚特兰大急性胰腺炎分类在一项前瞻性队列研究中的临床实用性:所有问题都解决了吗?

Clinical utility of the revised Atlanta classification of acute pancreatitis in a prospective cohort: have all loose ends been tied?

作者信息

Talukdar Rupjyoti, Bhattacharrya Abhik, Rao Bhavana, Sharma Mithun, Nageshwar Reddy D

机构信息

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India; Asian Healthcare Foundation, Hyderabad, India.

Asian Institute of Gastroenterology, Hyderabad, India.

出版信息

Pancreatology. 2014 Jul-Aug;14(4):257-62. doi: 10.1016/j.pan.2014.06.003. Epub 2014 Jun 20.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Revision of the Atlanta classification for acute pancreatitis (AP) was long awaited. The Revised Atlanta Classification has been recently proposed. In this study, we aim to prospectively evaluate and validate the clinical utility of the new definitions.

PATIENT AND METHODS

163 consecutive patients with AP were followed till death/6 mths after discharge. AP was categorized as mild (MAP) (no local complication[LC] and organ failure[OF]), moderate (MSAP)(transient OF and/or local/systemic complication but no persistent OF) and severe (SAP) AP (persistent OF). LC included acute peripancreatic fluid collections, pseudocyst, acute necrotic collection, walled-off necrosis, gastric outlet dysfunction, splenic/portal vein thrombosis, and colonic necrosis. Baseline characteristics (age/gender/hematocrit/BUN/SIRS/BISAP) and outcomes (total hospital stay/need for ICU care/ICU days/primary infected (peri)pancreatic necrosis[IN]/in-hospital death) were compared.

RESULTS

43 (26.4%) patients had ANP, 87 (53.4%) patients had MAP, 58 (35.6%) MSAP and 18 (11.04%) SAP. Among the baseline characteristics, BISAP score was significantly higher in MSAP compared to MAP [1.6 (1.5-2.01) vs 1.2 (1.9-2.4); p = 0.002]; and BUN was significantly higher in SAP compared to MSAP[64.9 (50.7-79.1) vs 24.9 (20.7-29.1); p < 0.0001]. All outcomes except mortality were significantly higher in MSAP compared to MAP. Need for ICU care (83.3%vs43.1%; p = 0.01), total ICU days[7.9 (4.8-10.9) vs 3.5 (2.7-5.1); p = 0.04] and mortality (38.9%vs1.7%; p = 0.0002) was significantly more in SAP compared to MSAP. 8/18 (44.4%) patients had POF within seven days of disease onset (early OF). This was associated with 37.5% of total in-hospital mortality. Patients with MSAP who had primary IN (n = 10) had similar outcomes as SAP.

CONCLUSIONS

This study prospectively validates the clinical utility of the Revised Atlanta definitions of AP. However, MSAP patients with primary infected necrosis may behave as SAP. Furthermore, patients with early severe acute pancreatitis (early OF) could represent a subgroup that needs to be dealt with separately in classification systems.

摘要

背景与目的

急性胰腺炎(AP)亚特兰大分类的修订早就备受期待。最近提出了修订后的亚特兰大分类。在本研究中,我们旨在前瞻性地评估和验证新定义的临床实用性。

患者与方法

163例连续的AP患者随访至死亡或出院后6个月。AP被分类为轻症(MAP)(无局部并发症[LC]和器官衰竭[OF])、中症(MSAP)(短暂性OF和/或局部/全身并发症,但无持续性OF)和重症(SAP)AP(持续性OF)。LC包括急性胰周液体积聚、假性囊肿、急性坏死性液体积聚、包裹性坏死、胃出口梗阻、脾/门静脉血栓形成和结肠坏死。比较基线特征(年龄/性别/血细胞比容/血尿素氮/SIRS/BISAP)和结局(总住院时间/ICU护理需求/ICU住院天数/原发性感染性(胰周)坏死[IN]/院内死亡)。

结果

43例(26.4%)患者为急性坏死性胰腺炎(ANP),87例(53.4%)为MAP,58例(35.6%)为MSAP,18例(11.04%)为SAP。在基线特征中,MSAP的BISAP评分显著高于MAP[1.6(1.5 - 2.01)对1.2(1.9 - 2.4);p = 0.002];SAP的血尿素氮显著高于MSAP[64.9(50.7 - 79.1)对24.9(20.7 - 29.1);p < 0.0001]。除死亡率外,MSAP的所有结局均显著高于MAP。与MSAP相比,SAP的ICU护理需求(83.3%对43.1%;p = 0.01)、总ICU住院天数[7.9(4.8 - 10.9)对3.5(2.7 - 5.1);p = 0.04]和死亡率(38.9%对1.7%;p = 0.0002)显著更高。18例患者中有8例(44.4%)在疾病发作后7天内发生持续性器官衰竭(早期OF)。这与37.5%的院内总死亡率相关。有原发性IN的MSAP患者(n = 10)与SAP患者的结局相似。

结论

本研究前瞻性地验证了修订后的亚特兰大AP定义的临床实用性。然而,有原发性感染性坏死的MSAP患者可能表现得与SAP患者一样。此外,早期重症急性胰腺炎(早期OF)患者可能代表一个在分类系统中需要单独处理的亚组。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验