Department of Infectious Diseases, Infection Control and Employee Health, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX 77030, USA.
Bone Marrow Transplant. 2011 Feb;46(2):165-73. doi: 10.1038/bmt.2010.256. Epub 2010 Nov 1.
Antifungal prophylaxis in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients is a rapidly evolving field. For this prophylaxis to be beneficial and cost-effective, the risk of a life-threatening invasive fungal infection (IFI) should outweigh the risks of toxic effects and drug interactions introduced by the antifungal agent used. Not all hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients have the same risk of IFIs. New prophylactic strategies using risk stratification and new broad-spectrum antifungals have the potential for reducing IFI-associated mortality in these patients. Further refinement of risk stratification and risk/benefit analysis (including pharmacoeconomic analysis) is needed. Stratification of IFI risk could be further sharpened based on emerging genetic and metabolic risk factors. However, 10 years after deciphering the human genome, it is unclear whether the genomic revolution would pay off for identifying the SCT recipients at highest risk for IFIs. Empiricism and reliance on institution-specific epidemiologic data are still expected to be a major part of the 'art and science' of risk stratification for fungal infections in SCT.
抗真菌预防在造血干细胞移植受者中是一个快速发展的领域。为了使这种预防措施具有益处和成本效益,应该权衡使用抗真菌药物带来的危及生命的侵袭性真菌感染(IFI)风险与毒性作用和药物相互作用的风险。并非所有造血干细胞移植受者都有相同的 IFI 风险。使用风险分层和新型广谱抗真菌药物的新预防策略有可能降低这些患者的 IFI 相关死亡率。需要进一步细化风险分层和风险/效益分析(包括药物经济学分析)。基于新兴的遗传和代谢风险因素,IFI 风险的分层可以进一步细化。然而,在人类基因组解码 10 年后,尚不清楚基因组革命是否会为确定 IFI 风险最高的 SCT 受者带来回报。经验主义和对机构特定流行病学数据的依赖仍然是 SCT 真菌感染风险分层的“艺术和科学”的重要组成部分。