• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准:S4-5 皮节感觉检查与肛门直肠检查的关系。

The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: relationship between S4-5 dermatome testing and anorectal testing.

机构信息

Shriners Hospitals for Children-Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19140, USA.

出版信息

Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):352-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.144. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1038/sc.2010.144
PMID:21042330
Abstract

STUDY DESIGN

Prospective cross-sectional multicenter study.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the correlation, sensitivity, specificity and predictive values of S4-5 dermatome and the anorectal examination for determination of sacral sparing in the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury (ISNCSCI) examination.

SETTING

Two tertiary hospitals that specialize in pediatric spinal cord injuries.

METHODS

In all, 189 patients who were at minimum 3 month after spinal cord injury participated in complete ISNCSCI examinations. All examiners completed training for the proper completion of the ISNCSCI examination. Correlations and sensitivity/specificity analyses were conducted between S4-5 dermatome testing and the anorectal examination. Results were analyzed by age of patient, examiner, tetraplegia/paraplegia classification and injury level (T10-S3, L1-S3 and S3).

RESULTS

The correlation between S4-5 dermatome and anorectal sensation was moderate (0.62, P<0.001). Using the anorectal examination as the gold standard, the sensitivity of S4-5 testing was 0.60 (0.49, 70) and specificity was 0.96 (0.90, 0.99). No single age group, tester, level, or type of injury differed from the overall result.

CONCLUSION

In the pediatric population, the correlation between S4-5 and anorectal sensation was lower than anticipated. The sensitivity of 0.62 for S4-5 testing and diminished sensation between T10 and S3 suggests that anorectal testing may either be a more sensitive representation of S4-5 function or activate an alternative neuronal pathway that is perceived by the patient. Further investigation into the validity of the sacral sparing components of the ISNCSCI examination is warranted.

摘要

研究设计

前瞻性的横断面多中心研究。

目的

评估 S4-5 皮节和肛门直肠检查在国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准(ISNCSCI)检查中确定骶骨保留的相关性、敏感性、特异性和预测值。

设置

两家专门治疗小儿脊髓损伤的三级医院。

方法

共有 189 名脊髓损伤后至少 3 个月的患者参加了完整的 ISNCSCI 检查。所有检查者都接受了正确完成 ISNCSCI 检查的培训。对 S4-5 皮节测试和肛门直肠检查之间进行了相关性和敏感性/特异性分析。结果按患者年龄、检查者、四肢瘫/截瘫分类和损伤水平(T10-S3、L1-S3 和 S3)进行分析。

结果

S4-5 皮节与肛门直肠感觉之间的相关性为中度(0.62,P<0.001)。以肛门直肠检查为金标准,S4-5 测试的敏感性为 0.60(0.49,70),特异性为 0.96(0.90,0.99)。没有任何一个年龄组、检查者、水平或损伤类型与总体结果不同。

结论

在儿科人群中,S4-5 与肛门直肠感觉之间的相关性低于预期。S4-5 测试的敏感性为 0.62,T10 与 S3 之间感觉减退提示肛门直肠测试可能更敏感地反映 S4-5 的功能,或者激活了一种被患者感知到的替代神经元通路。需要进一步研究 ISNCSCI 检查中骶骨保留成分的有效性。

相似文献

1
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: relationship between S4-5 dermatome testing and anorectal testing.国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准:S4-5 皮节感觉检查与肛门直肠检查的关系。
Spinal Cord. 2011 Mar;49(3):352-6. doi: 10.1038/sc.2010.144. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
2
Sacral sparing in SCI: beyond the S4-S5 and anorectal examination.SCI 中的骶骨保留:超越 S4-S5 水平和肛门直肠检查。
Spine J. 2012 May;12(5):389-400.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2012.03.028. Epub 2012 May 8.
3
Intra-rater agreement of the anorectal exam and classification of injury severity in children with spinal cord injury.脊髓损伤患儿肛门直肠检查的评分者内一致性及损伤严重程度分类
Spinal Cord. 2009 Sep;47(9):687-91. doi: 10.1038/sc.2008.180. Epub 2009 Feb 3.
4
Interrater reliability of the international standards for neurological classification of spinal cord injury in youths with chronic spinal cord injury.青少年慢性脊髓损伤国际神经分类标准的跨评定者信度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1264-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.003.
5
An interview based approach to the anorectal portion of the International Standards of Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury Exam (I-A-ISNCSCI): a pilot study.基于访谈的国际脊髓损伤神经分类标准(I-A-ISNCSCI)肛门直肠部分检查方法:一项初步研究。
Spinal Cord. 2020 May;58(5):553-559. doi: 10.1038/s41393-019-0399-5. Epub 2019 Dec 10.
6
Reliability and Validity of S3 Pressure Sensation as an Alternative to Deep Anal Pressure in Neurologic Classification of Persons With Spinal Cord Injury.作为脊髓损伤患者神经学分类中深部肛管压力替代指标的S3压力感觉的可靠性和有效性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2016 Oct;97(10):1642-6. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.02.006. Epub 2016 Feb 26.
7
Chronic spinal cord injury in the pediatric population: does magnetic resonance imaging correlate with the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury examination?小儿慢性脊髓损伤:磁共振成像与脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准检查相关吗?
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Jan 1;34(1):74-81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e318191f291.
8
Feasibility of using training cases from International Spinal Cord Injury Core Data Set for testing of International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury items.使用国际脊髓损伤核心数据集的训练病例来测试脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准项目的可行性。
Spinal Cord. 2014 Dec;52(12):919-22. doi: 10.1038/sc.2014.141. Epub 2014 Sep 2.
9
Diffusion tensor imaging in pediatric spinal cord injury: preliminary examination of reliability and clinical correlation.儿童脊髓损伤的弥散张量成像:可靠性和临床相关性的初步研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2012 Jun 1;37(13):E797-803. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e3182470a08.
10
The International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury: reliability of data when applied to children and youths.《脊髓损伤神经学分类国际标准:应用于儿童和青少年时的数据可靠性》
Spinal Cord. 2007 Jun;45(6):452-9. doi: 10.1038/sj.sc.3101987. Epub 2006 Oct 3.

引用本文的文献

1
The diagnostic and prognostic capability of artificial intelligence in spinal cord injury: A systematic review.人工智能在脊髓损伤中的诊断和预后评估能力:一项系统综述。
Brain Spine. 2025 Feb 5;5:104208. doi: 10.1016/j.bas.2025.104208. eCollection 2025.
2
Evaluation of clinical factors predicting dysphagia in patients with traumatic and non-traumatic cervical spinal cord injury: a retrospective study.创伤性和非创伤性颈脊髓损伤患者吞咽困难预测临床因素的评估:一项回顾性研究。
Front Neurol. 2024 May 15;15:1376171. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1376171. eCollection 2024.
3
Clinical Utility of Diffusion Tensor Imaging as a Biomarker to Identify Microstructural Changes in Pediatric Spinal Cord Injury.
弥散张量成像作为生物标志物在儿童脊髓损伤中识别微观结构变化的临床应用。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2022 Spring;28(2):1-12. doi: 10.46292/sci21-00048. Epub 2022 Apr 12.
4
What is the clinical meaning of a negative bulbocavernosus reflex in spinal cord injury patients?脊髓损伤患者球海绵体反射阴性的临床意义是什么?
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2022 Feb 18;8(1):24. doi: 10.1038/s41394-022-00495-w.
5
The Comparative Effects of Mesenchymal Stem Cell Transplantation Therapy for Spinal Cord Injury in Humans and Animal Models: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.间充质干细胞移植疗法对人类和动物模型脊髓损伤的比较效果:一项系统评价和荟萃分析
Biology (Basel). 2021 Mar 16;10(3):230. doi: 10.3390/biology10030230.
6
[Efficacy of intramedullary and extramedullary decompression and lavage therapy under microscope for treatment of chronic cervical spinal cord injury].显微镜下髓内与髓外减压及冲洗治疗慢性颈脊髓损伤的疗效
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2018 Feb 20;38(2):174-180. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1673-4254.2018.02.09.
7
Pulse article: How do you do the international standards for neurological classification of SCI anorectal exam?《脉搏》文章:如何进行脊髓损伤神经学分类的国际标准肛门直肠检查?
Spinal Cord Ser Cases. 2017 Oct 25;3:17078. doi: 10.1038/s41394-017-0015-x. eCollection 2017.
8
Development and validation of a bowel-routine-based self-report questionnaire for sacral sparing after spinal cord injury.基于肠道常规的脊髓损伤后骶部保留自我报告问卷的开发与验证
Spinal Cord. 2017 Nov;55(11):1010-1015. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.77. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
9
Recommendations for the National Institute for Neurologic Disorders and Stroke spinal cord injury common data elements for children and youth with SCI.美国国立神经疾病和中风研究所关于脊髓损伤儿童和青少年常见数据元素的建议。
Spinal Cord. 2017 Apr;55(4):331-340. doi: 10.1038/sc.2016.139. Epub 2016 Nov 15.
10
Classifications In Brief: American Spinal Injury Association (ASIA) Impairment Scale.简要分类:美国脊髓损伤协会(ASIA)损伤分级量表
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 May;475(5):1499-1504. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-5133-4. Epub 2016 Nov 4.