Liu N, Xing H, Zhou M-W, Biering-Sørensen F
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
Clinic for Spinal Cord Injuries, Rigshospitalet, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Spinal Cord. 2017 Nov;55(11):1010-1015. doi: 10.1038/sc.2017.77. Epub 2017 Jul 11.
An observational study.
To develop a self-administered tool for assessment of sacral sparing after spinal cord injury (SCI) and to test its validity in individuals with SCI.
Peking University Third Hospital, Beijing, China.
A 5-item SCI sacral sparing self-report questionnaire was developed based on several events that most patients might experience during bowel routine. 102 participants who sustained SCI within 12 months were asked to complete the questionnaire followed by an anorectal examination. Agreements of answers to the questionnaire and the physical examination were analyzed. Sensitivity, specificity and Youden's index of each item was calculated.
The first four questions regarding the S4-5 sensation including deep anal pressure showed high agreement with the results of the physical examination (κ: 0.79-0.93). Sensitivity, specificity and Youden's index were also high (all above 80%). For the fifth question related to the voluntary anal contraction, the agreement was almost perfect with good sensitivity and specificity among patients without increased anal sphincter tone (AST). In patients with increased AST, the agreement was fair.
The validity of this questionnaire for the assessment of sacral sparing in up to 12 months post injury is good except for the motor function when there was increased AST. In some situations it could be considered as an alternative tool for digital rectal examination, especially when repeated examinations are not feasible. It is suggested that change of sacral sparing may be detected by the questionnaire.
一项观察性研究。
开发一种用于评估脊髓损伤(SCI)后骶部保留情况的自我管理工具,并在脊髓损伤患者中测试其有效性。
中国北京,北京大学第三医院。
基于大多数患者在排便常规过程中可能经历的若干事件,开发了一份包含5个项目的SCI骶部保留自我报告问卷。102名在12个月内发生脊髓损伤的参与者被要求完成问卷,随后进行肛门直肠检查。分析问卷答案与体格检查结果的一致性。计算每个项目的敏感性、特异性和约登指数。
关于S4-5感觉(包括深部肛门压力)的前四个问题与体格检查结果高度一致(κ值:0.79 - 0.93)。敏感性、特异性和约登指数也很高(均高于80%)。对于与自主肛门收缩相关的第五个问题,在肛门括约肌张力(AST)未增加的患者中,一致性几乎完美,敏感性和特异性良好。在AST增加的患者中,一致性一般。
该问卷在评估损伤后长达12个月的骶部保留情况时,除了AST增加时的运动功能外,有效性良好。在某些情况下,它可被视为直肠指检的替代工具,尤其是在重复检查不可行时。建议通过该问卷可检测骶部保留情况的变化。