• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胃癌根治术后定期随访检测复发的肿瘤学效果。

Oncologic effectiveness of regular follow-up to detect recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer.

机构信息

Gastric Cancer Branch, Research Institute & Hospital, National Cancer Center, Goyang-si, Gyeonggi-do, South Korea.

出版信息

Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):358-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1395-3. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1245/s10434-010-1395-3
PMID:21042946
Abstract

BACKGROUND

While clinicians routinely follow up gastric cancer patients after curative resection to detect recurrence, the effectiveness of regular follow-up has not been proven, and no consensus has been reached regarding follow-up programs.

METHODS

Of the 1,767 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer from 2001 to 2004, 310 (17.5%) developed recurrence during follow-up. The oncologic effectiveness of follow-up was evaluated using recurrence detection rates during follow-up and survivals. Clinicopathologic characteristics, the detection tools used, and times lapsed between recurrence and previous examinations were also investigated.

RESULTS

Two hundred thirty-three (75.2%) of the 310 patients who developed recurrence were detected by regular follow-up (detected group). The frequencies of undifferentiated and diffuse-type recurrences were higher in patients with recurrence detected based on patient-initiated findings (undetected group) than in the detected group. Computed tomography and tumor markers were the first detection tools that yielded positive findings. Times between recurrence detection and previous examinations ranged from 2.8 to 5.3 months over the first 2 years. No difference in overall survival was found between the detected and undetected groups (log rank, P = 0.2).

CONCLUSIONS

The oncologic effectiveness of regular follow-up after curative resection for gastric cancer was found to be unsatisfactory. A large-scale randomized controlled trial is required to identify the effectiveness of regular follow-up in terms of its oncologic, functional, psychological, and economical aspects.

摘要

背景

尽管临床医生通常会在根治性切除术后对胃癌患者进行随访以检测复发,但定期随访的效果尚未得到证实,并且对于随访方案也没有达成共识。

方法

在 2001 年至 2004 年间接受根治性胃切除术的 1767 例患者中,有 310 例(17.5%)在随访期间复发。通过随访期间的复发检测率和生存率评估随访的肿瘤学效果。还研究了临床病理特征、使用的检测工具以及复发与前一次检查之间的时间间隔。

结果

在 310 例复发患者中,有 233 例(75.2%)通过常规随访(检测组)发现。与通过患者主动发现(未检测组)而发现的复发患者相比,检测组中未分化型和弥漫型复发的频率更高。计算机断层扫描和肿瘤标志物是首次发现阳性结果的检测工具。在头 2 年内,从复发检测到前一次检查的时间间隔为 2.8 至 5.3 个月。检测组和未检测组之间的总体生存率无差异(对数秩检验,P=0.2)。

结论

根治性切除术后常规随访的肿瘤学效果并不令人满意。需要进行大规模的随机对照试验,以确定常规随访在肿瘤学、功能、心理和经济学方面的有效性。

相似文献

1
Oncologic effectiveness of regular follow-up to detect recurrence after curative resection of gastric cancer.胃癌根治术后定期随访检测复发的肿瘤学效果。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2011 Feb;18(2):358-64. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-1395-3. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
2
Combined epithelial-mesenchymal transition with cancer stem cell-like marker as predictors of recurrence after radical resection for gastric cancer.联合上皮-间质转化与癌症干细胞样标志物作为胃癌根治性切除术后复发的预测指标。
World J Surg Oncol. 2014 Dec 2;12:368. doi: 10.1186/1477-7819-12-368.
3
Long-term results and prognostic factors of gastric cancer patients with only positive peritoneal lavage cytology.仅腹膜灌洗液细胞学阳性的胃癌患者的长期结果和预后因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2012 Mar 15;105(4):393-9. doi: 10.1002/jso.22091. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
4
Clinicopathologic characteristics and outcomes of surgery of middle-third gastric cancer.胃中上部癌的临床病理特征及手术结果
Tumour Biol. 2012 Dec;33(6):2091-8. doi: 10.1007/s13277-012-0468-2. Epub 2012 Aug 7.
5
Early detection of nonperitoneal recurrence may contribute to survival benefit after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.早期发现非腹膜复发可能有助于胃癌根治性胃切除术后的生存获益。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(Suppl 1):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0661-x. Epub 2016 Oct 24.
6
The pattern and risk factors of recurrence of proximal gastric cancer after curative resection.根治性切除术后近端胃癌复发的模式和危险因素。
J Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;107(2):130-5. doi: 10.1002/jso.23252. Epub 2012 Sep 4.
7
Examination of cancer cells exposed to gastric serosa by serosal stamp cytology plus RT-PCR is useful for the identification of gastric cancer patients at high risk of peritoneal recurrence.通过浆膜印片细胞学检查加逆转录聚合酶链反应对暴露于胃浆膜的癌细胞进行检测,有助于识别有腹膜复发高风险的胃癌患者。
Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;26(4):352-358. doi: 10.1016/j.suronc.2017.07.008. Epub 2017 Jul 21.
8
Intraoperatively assessed macroscopic serosal changes in patients with curatively resected advanced gastric cancer: clinical implications for prognosis and peritoneal recurrence.根治性切除的进展期胃癌患者术中评估的宏观浆膜变化:对预后和腹膜复发的临床意义
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Sep;22(9):2940-7. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4352-8. Epub 2015 Jan 21.
9
Chemoresponse after non-curative gastrectomy for M1 gastric cancer.M1期胃癌非根治性胃切除术后的化疗反应
World J Surg Oncol. 2015 Jan 30;13:13. doi: 10.1186/s12957-015-0447-3.
10
Prognostic factors and recurrence pattern in node-negative advanced gastric cancer.淋巴结阴性的进展期胃癌的预后因素和复发模式。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2013 Feb;39(2):136-40. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2012.10.008. Epub 2012 Nov 11.

引用本文的文献

1
Effect of Vitamin B12 Replacement Intervals on Clinical Symptoms and Laboratory Findings in Gastric Cancer Patients after Total Gastrectomy.维生素B₁₂补充间隔对胃癌全胃切除术后患者临床症状及实验室检查结果的影响
Cancers (Basel). 2023 Oct 11;15(20):4938. doi: 10.3390/cancers15204938.
2
Whether preferences of gastric cancer patients after surgery for follow-up change over time? Analysis based on discrete choice experiment.胃癌患者术后随访偏好是否随时间变化?基于离散选择实验的分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2023 Mar 25;31(4):234. doi: 10.1007/s00520-023-07699-2.
3
Evaluation of post-operative surveillance strategies for esophageal and gastric cancers: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
评估食管癌和胃癌术后监测策略的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Dis Esophagus. 2022 Dec 14;35(12). doi: 10.1093/dote/doac034.
4
Prospective multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing survival rates, quality of life and nutritional status between advanced gastric cancer patients with different follow-up intensities: study protocol for the STOFOLUP trial.前瞻性多中心随机临床试验比较不同随访强度的晚期胃癌患者的生存率、生活质量和营养状况:STOFOLUP 试验研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Dec 8;11(12):e056187. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-056187.
5
Eliciting gastric cancer survivors' preferences for follow-up services: a discrete choice experiment protocol.探索胃癌幸存者对随访服务的偏好:一项离散选择实验方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 15;11(11):e049742. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049742.
6
Predictive Role of Endoscopic Surveillance after Total Gastrectomy with R0 Resection for Gastric Cancer.胃癌R0切除术后全胃切除内镜监测的预测作用
J Korean Med Sci. 2021 Apr 12;36(14):e88. doi: 10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e88.
7
ADJUVANT CHEMORADIOTHERAPY AFTER SUBTOTAL OR TOTAL GASTRECTOMY AND D2 LIMPHADENECTOMY INCREASES SURVIVAL IN ADVANCED GASTRIC CANCER?全胃或次全胃切除及D2淋巴结清扫术后辅助放化疗可提高进展期胃癌患者的生存率?
Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2019 Dec 20;32(4):e1464. doi: 10.1590/0102-672020190001e1464. eCollection 2019.
8
Gastric Cancer Peritoneal Carcinomatosis Risk Score.胃癌腹膜转移危险评分
Ann Surg Oncol. 2020 Jan;27(1):240-247. doi: 10.1245/s10434-019-07624-0. Epub 2019 Jul 25.
9
Follow-up after surgery for gastric cancer: how to do it.胃癌手术后的随访:如何进行
Updates Surg. 2018 Jun;70(2):293-299. doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0524-6. Epub 2018 Mar 26.
10
Early detection of nonperitoneal recurrence may contribute to survival benefit after curative gastrectomy for gastric cancer.早期发现非腹膜复发可能有助于胃癌根治性胃切除术后的生存获益。
Gastric Cancer. 2017 Mar;20(Suppl 1):141-149. doi: 10.1007/s10120-016-0661-x. Epub 2016 Oct 24.