• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

认知控制的动态:来自频率标记 EEG 的试验内冲突适应的证据。

The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.

出版信息

Psychophysiology. 2011 May;48(5):591-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.

DOI:10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x
PMID:21044093
Abstract

A central topic in the cognitive sciences is how cognitive control is adapted flexibly to changing task demands. Conflict monitoring theory originally proposed conflict triggered adjustments of cognitive control after a conflict trial to improve subsequent performance. In the present study, we tested the hypothesis that readjustments of cognitive control occur continuously within a conflict trial itself. Using frequency tagged electroencephalogram in a flanker task, we traced the allocation of attention to target and distracter stimuli. We found evidence for a conflict-triggered within-trial contrast enhancement dissociating target and distracters. This contrast enhancement vanished for consecutive trials with constant tagging frequencies, indicating that trial-to-trial conflict adaptation effects may, at least partly, be the product of interacting processes serving conflict resolution within trials.

摘要

认知科学的一个核心主题是认知控制如何灵活适应不断变化的任务需求。冲突监测理论最初提出,在冲突试验后,冲突会引发认知控制的调整,以提高后续的表现。在本研究中,我们检验了这样一个假设,即在冲突试验本身内部,认知控制会持续进行调整。在一项侧抑制任务中使用频率标记脑电图,我们追踪了注意力在目标和分心刺激之间的分配。我们发现了冲突触发的试验内对比增强的证据,这种对比增强在连续的恒定标记频率试验中消失了,这表明试验间冲突适应效应可能至少部分是在试验内解决冲突的相互作用过程的产物。

相似文献

1
The dynamics of cognitive control: evidence for within-trial conflict adaptation from frequency-tagged EEG.认知控制的动态:来自频率标记 EEG 的试验内冲突适应的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2011 May;48(5):591-600. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01137.x. Epub 2010 Nov 2.
2
Cognitive performance and electrophysiological indices of cognitive control: a validation study of conflict adaptation.认知表现和认知控制的电生理指标:冲突适应的验证研究。
Psychophysiology. 2012 May;49(5):627-37. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2011.01345.x. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
3
Conflict adaptation and sequential trial effects: support for the conflict monitoring theory.冲突适应和连续试验效应:支持冲突监测理论。
Neuropsychologia. 2011 Jun;49(7):1953-61. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.03.023. Epub 2011 Mar 22.
4
Conflict and error adaptation in the Simon task.西蒙任务中的冲突与错误适应
Acta Psychol (Amst). 2011 Feb;136(2):212-6. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2010.05.006. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Cognitive control: dynamic, sustained, and voluntary influences.认知控制:动态、持续且自主的影响。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2008 Apr;34(2):340-55. doi: 10.1037/0096-1523.34.2.340.
6
Cognitive control in the intertrial interval: evidence from EEG alpha power.试验间隔期的认知控制:来自 EEG 阿尔法波功率的证据。
Psychophysiology. 2011 May;48(5):583-90. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2010.01124.x. Epub 2010 Sep 15.
7
Temporal course of cognitive control in a picture-word interference task.图片-单词干扰任务中认知控制的时间进程
Neuroreport. 2010 Jan 27;21(2):104-7. doi: 10.1097/WNR.0b013e32833499ff.
8
Dynamic goal states: adjusting cognitive control without conflict monitoring.动态目标状态:无需冲突监测即可调整认知控制。
Neuroimage. 2012 Oct 15;63(1):126-36. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.06.021. Epub 2012 Jun 23.
9
The neural correlates and functional integration of cognitive control in a Stroop task.斯特鲁普任务中认知控制的神经关联与功能整合
Neuroimage. 2005 Jan 15;24(2):539-47. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.09.007.
10
When cognitive control is calibrated: event-related potential correlates of adapting to information-processing conflict despite erroneous response preparation.当认知控制得到校准:尽管存在错误的反应准备,但适应信息处理冲突的事件相关电位相关物。
Psychophysiology. 2009 Nov;46(6):1226-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.2009.00864.x. Epub 2009 Jul 1.

引用本文的文献

1
Dynamic modulation of spatial selection: Online and anticipatory adjustments in the flanker task.空间选择的动态调制:侧翼任务中的在线和预期调整
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2025 Apr;87(3):794-814. doi: 10.3758/s13414-025-03026-5. Epub 2025 Feb 20.
2
Sequential and domain-specific processing mechanisms for dual cognitive-emotional conflict.双重认知-情绪冲突的连续和特定领域处理机制。
Psychol Res. 2024 Oct;88(7):2107-2120. doi: 10.1007/s00426-024-02012-0. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
3
Humans reconfigure target and distractor processing to address distinct task demands.
人类重新配置目标和干扰处理,以满足不同的任务需求。
Psychol Rev. 2024 Mar;131(2):349-372. doi: 10.1037/rev0000442. Epub 2023 Sep 4.
4
Memory for abstract control states does not decay with increasing retrieval delays.对抽象控制状态的记忆不会随着检索延迟的增加而衰减。
Psychol Res. 2024 Mar;88(2):547-561. doi: 10.1007/s00426-023-01870-4. Epub 2023 Aug 24.
5
Preferential Choice to Exert Cognitive Effort in Children with ADHD: a Diffusion Modelling Account.ADHD 儿童认知努力的偏好选择:扩散模型解释。
Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2023 Oct;51(10):1497-1509. doi: 10.1007/s10802-023-01080-x. Epub 2023 May 26.
6
The Willpower Paradox: Possible and Impossible Conceptions of Self-Control.意志力悖论:自我控制的可能与不可能的概念。
Perspect Psychol Sci. 2023 Nov;18(6):1339-1367. doi: 10.1177/17456916221146158. Epub 2023 Feb 15.
7
Attentional adjustment in priming tasks: control strategies depend on context.注意调整在启动任务中:控制策略取决于语境。
Cogn Process. 2023 Feb;24(1):1-23. doi: 10.1007/s10339-022-01117-x. Epub 2022 Dec 20.
8
Robot's Social Gaze Affects Conflict Resolution but not Conflict Adaptations.机器人的社交注视会影响冲突解决,但不会影响冲突适应。
J Cogn. 2022 Jan 6;5(1):2. doi: 10.5334/joc.189. eCollection 2022.
9
EEG response in humans for frequency-tagged anticorrelated random-dot stereograms: Increased coherency and alpha oscillations.人类对频率标记的反相关随机点立体图的脑电图反应:相干性增加和阿尔法振荡。
Front Neurosci. 2022 Jul 27;16:909225. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.909225. eCollection 2022.
10
Effects of conflict in cognitive control: Evidence from mouse tracking.认知控制中的冲突效应:来自鼠标追踪的证据。
Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2023 Jan;76(1):54-69. doi: 10.1177/17470218221078265. Epub 2022 Feb 21.